Senior one reading notes 100 words

Fan Ainong: From then on, I always thought this Fan Ainong was weird and hateful. ... the next day, Ainong came to the city, wearing the felt hat commonly used by farmers, and that smile was never seen before.

Appreciation: I found these two sentences by comparison. The first sentence uses the word "hen" to express Lu Xun's hatred for Fan Ainong, while the second sentence uses "love for agriculture" to express Lu Xun's goodwill towards Fan Ainong. At the beginning of the article, I wrote how disgusting Fan Ainong was, which ambushed the goodwill of later writers. This is a way of writing, which is based on comparing the friendship between Lu Xun and Fan Ainong. He wrote five poems for Fan Ainong.

General comment: At the beginning of the article, the author described in plain language that he once knew Fan Ainong in the teahouse, and first expressed his hatred for him, paving the way for his kindness and friendship in later writing. The writing technique of wanting to promote before restraining is in place, and the simple but concise language shows us Mr. Lu Xun's sympathy and responsibility for the students who died in the country.

Every family has different ways of education, and Letters from Fu Lei is a painstaking educational book, a rare good book, which is most suitable for parents and children to read.

Fu Lei's method of educating children is unique. He conveyed his true feelings to distant children through letters, sincerely guided his son's life and art, and secretly showed his concern and love for his son. Good family education is good for children, which can determine a child's life. After all, family education was the first teacher, and Fu Lei also educated his son into a talent in a good way, which made people full of praise.

The purpose of writing War and Peace is that "two words can be harmful": on the one hand, write Tuoweng's view of history, or more accurately, how to "write history", on the other hand, write Tuoweng's definition of happiness. The stories and characters in the novel serve these two purposes. Therefore, this book is not so much a novel as a philosophical theory reader, and the story is just an example. Its main purpose is not to explain the historical background at that time or the performance of different characters in the same historical period, but to use these people to explain their own definition of happiness in history.

In "A Handsome Soldier", the brain is as simple as an imbecile, with a constant smirk on his face and endless stories in his mouth. This is the handsome guy in my eyes!

I never thought Shuaike was smart. Is it wise to incite the army? I never thought Shuaike was witty. Is it a sign of wisdom to tell a rambling story to the chief? I never thought Shuaike was brave. Doesn't he even have the basic ability to distinguish danger? Is this a sign of courage?

I don't know from the beginning, as long as it is the protagonist of the story, it must be a brilliant figure. After removing the dazzling brilliance, Shuaike is a poor idiot who knows nothing!

I read Hemingway's novel The Old Man and the Sea. I admire the will of the old fisherman in the novel.

What I admire most is the will of the old fisherman in the novel. He taught me that one must have perseverance to succeed.

The novel describes Santiago, an old fisherman who is lonely, failed, brave and fearless, loves life and is eager to win. I went fishing alone, and a big fish was hooked, so I couldn't pull it out. After three days and nights together, the old fisherman stabbed the big fish to death with a harpoon.

When I came back from fishing, several groups of sharks scrambled for food because of the bloody smell on the wound of the big fish. But the old man still didn't want to give up like this and bravely struggled with one shark after another. Until the last moment, the fisherman didn't give up and still tried. Although there were only fish heads and bones left, and he was exhausted, he still took the wreckage back to the fishing port, which made other fishermen admire him.

"The Old Man and the Sea" told me: "People are not born to be defeated. You can destroy him as much as you can, but you can't beat him!

Impermanence describes the image of impermanence seen in the countryside and drama stage when I was a child, which shows that the straightforward and fair image of impermanence is loved by the people because there is no justice in the world, the wicked can't get what they deserve, and "fair trial is in the underworld".

Lu Xun wrote many times that ghosts are "impermanent" in "Morning Flowers and Evening Picks". In impermanence, he described in detail the impermanence he saw at the temple fair.

It can be seen that people in temple fairs prefer white impermanence, but generally hate black impermanence, and from the text, Lu Xun also prefers white impermanence. I think he is "not only lively but also humorous". And just because you are completely white, you can be very eye-catching among all kinds of ghosts and stand out from the crowd. So we can know that Bai impermanence was a very conspicuous role in the temple fair at that time.

The whole article is permeated with the author's admiration and praise for the impermanence of life. First of all, I wrote about my fear of him when I was a child and compared it with my admiration for him now. I also compared Yan Luowang's stupidity with the horror of impermanence of death, highlighting the goodness of impermanence of life.

The author also wants to tell us that even ghosts have such kindness. What should people do?

Reflections on the fate of reading

A while ago, I bought a book in the Book City called "A Drop of Water Hides the Sea", which contains 300 classic philosophical stories. Now I'm going to taste a little story called fate.

"Destiny" is about the fate of two children, one is divined by a monk as the "number one scholar" and the other is a beggar. Twenty years later, the original champion became a beggar, but the beggar became a champion.

God said, "the talent I give to everyone accounts for one-third of his fate, and the rest depends on how he grasps it."

After reading this passage, I was very moved. Grasp, grasp the fate, what a simple sentence, but how many people really grasp their own destiny? Don't blame your own talent, let alone your own fate, because fate is in your own hands and can be changed at any time! As long as you are willing to

Thoughts on Reading A Farewell to Arms

A person who bid farewell to weapons is either a prisoner of the enemy or a prisoner of love. I am not bad at self-protection, but I am really a person who gives up self-protection. Just like the database of life, you can open all programs and read all files at any time without entering a password. The prisoner I'm talking about is a prisoner in this sense. When I put myself in the sun, I understand that I can't pretend anymore. The thought of hidden days is disturbing. When I realized the helplessness of resistance, how much time was irreversible and how many memories faded out of my heart. In the final analysis, the prisoner is an irresistible person, that is, he must have enough courage to give up hope and bear all the pressure of survival. Originally, in a personal space, he could immerse himself in his own fantasy and open virtual flowers from the dust. And a person who gives up self-protection can't even fool himself.

Reflections on Hamlet

Shakespeare's Hamlet is a classic. This book is not much different from historical legends in surface plot. It tells the story of the Danish prince's revenge for his father, full of bloody violence and death.

Horatio, a dramatist, said: You can hear the ending of rape and murder, abnormal repair, unconscious judgment, accidental slaughter, skillful murder and self-mutilation. The tortuous plot revolves around revenge.

Hamlet rushed back to China from wittenberg to attend his father's funeral. What he couldn't accept was that he didn't attend his father's funeral, but witnessed his mother's wedding with his uncle Claudius, which made Hamlet suspicious. In addition, he saw his father's ghost on the terrace of the palace castle at night, complaining that this atrocity was done by Hamlet's uncle and demanding his revenge for his father. At this point, he began a difficult journey of revenge.

Random thoughts on The Count of Monte Cristo

Love thoroughly, hate thoroughly, appreciate thoroughly, and retaliate thoroughly. This is my biggest feeling after reading The Revenge of Monte Cristo. There's a saying in China that revenge is never too late. Revenge also needs to be recharged, and you can't act rashly with a temporary mood. The count of Monte Cristo explained this proverb in the most concrete way. Fourteen years in a dungeon, a benefactor and an enemy. After identifying the person he was looking for, he didn't go through fire and water to stab the enemy to death at any cost, as we saw in martial arts novels. He chose his own path. He tried his best to support the shipowners who had been kind to him, silently, in various ways, but never let them know that he actually came to repay the kindness.

Reflections on dream interpretation

Freud (1856-L939) is a famous psychiatrist in Austria and the founder of psychoanalysis. His works have spanned half a century, and have exerted extensive and profound influence on literature, philosophy, theology, ethics, aesthetics, politics, sociology and popular psychology. If the scope of influence is taken as a measure of greatness, then Freud is undoubtedly the greatest psychologist. Freud initiated another Copernican revolution in the history of human thought. He pointed out that people's unconsciousness is not controlled by consciousness, and people's subconscious contains huge psychological content. He used the most rational voice to talk about human irrationality. Interpretation of Dreams is Freud's pillar academic work. Through the study of dreams, it has greatly expanded the scope of human exploration and had a far-reaching impact on our lives.

Reflections on Red and Black

What the writer shows is, first of all, a typical window of the whole French society-the political structure of the small town of Villiers. Mayor Draena, who was born in nobility, was the highest representative of the Restoration Dynasty here, and regarded it as his bounden duty to safeguard the restoration regime and prevent bourgeois liberals from seizing power. Vanod, the director of the poor shelter, is an ordinary citizen. He got the fat job now because he took refuge in the secret organization of the Catholic Church. So as to bind themselves to the restoration regime. Father Ma Si Long, a copy of the church, is a spy sent by the church, and everyone's words and deeds are under his supervision. In this era when the throne and the altar support each other, he is a hot person. The three-headed politics of these three people reflected the situation that the restoration forces monopolized power in Villier. Their opposites are very heavy. A radical bourgeois liberal with strong economic strength. On the one hand, Stendhal described the tyranny of royalists to people, on the other hand, he made people draw the conclusion that the bourgeoisie with economic strength will also be the final winner politically. Before the July Revolution of 1830, Stendhal seemed to understand the inevitable trend of this historical movement.

Jane Eyre is loved by many people because of the author's self-esteem and ordinary? In other words, it is Charlotte's self-esteem and ordinary. That is a woman with a hot soul and a simple appearance. This image is undoubtedly an immortal classic. But this image, like her husband Rochester, always speaks with a tone similar to pride? Their contempt for others used to make me happy more or less, but now it makes me uneasy. Charlotte entrusted herself to Jane Eyre,

This is what I know. But what I feel is that her contempt and almost hostile attitude towards high-ranking nobles is somewhat deliberate. On the other hand, I read the feeling of inferiority.

Jane Eyre is a sensitive and easily injured woman. At first, it took too long to describe her childhood. But my feeling is that when describing Jane Eyre, Charlotte never left this body, so she didn't describe it from the perspective of omniscience. So, what she described can almost be regarded as her opinion. So, what I saw in Jane Eyre was some kind of emotional inferiority, and then it was almost legendary love? It's just that its legend shows some unreality and fantasy? There is a final ending, almost a bit hard. She met John Rivers. Although there is a pen in front, it is not so natural. Charlotte's handling of Jane Eyre is very real at the beginning and wonderful in the middle, but it hides anxiety. In the end, it's almost a cliche? It's a cliche. I expected that in the end, there is no doubt that everyone was happy and a little sad. Her bedding and connections are perfect, and she can hardly feel any flaws. But what I vaguely feel is that this is a story made up by a secular woman. It has lost its novel structure that makes me shudder? More often, I read Jane Eyre and left the villa, never to watch it again. If I were Charlotte, maybe I would go there. Because everything after that, in my opinion, is very clumsy compared with before.

Notes on Water Margin (1)-Drunk Jiang Menshen

Song Wu killed Ximen Qing, was sent to banishment in Mengzhou, and met Zhang Qing and Sun Erniang in Hengpo. But these are not exciting enough, but this episode of Song Wu's drunken beating of Jiang Menshen is the most exciting.

In this episode, Song Wu helped Mercy recapture the Happy Forest for personal friendship, and every wine officer on the way ate three bowls of wine. These two points show that he has a feeling of letting go of himself.

And his teasing before hitting Jiang Menshen was even more wonderful. He first found fault with the wine officer, and then provoked Jiang Menshen and beat him hard, which can prove that Song Wu was a careless person.

He can also be divided into several details when flirting. He changed the wine three times, and then said that he would let Jiang Menshen's concubine drink with him. If the wine is full, he will fight with them (including Jiang Menshen here).

After he killed Jiang Menshen, he was afraid that he would sue the official. When he asked Jiang Menshen for the third thing, he was afraid that he would sue officials and take back Happy Forest in the future, so he was told to leave Mengzhou and not to live here. This also shows how careful Song Wu is.

Notes on Water Margin (II) —— Four Tigers in Yiling

Li Kui jy saw the reunion of Song Jiang and his son and missed his mother, so he went to Baizhang Village in Yishui County to visit his mother.

On the way, I met Gui Li as a fake Li Kui jy threat. Gui Li was defeated and asked for forgiveness, saying that he had a 90-year-old mother. Killing him means killing him and his mother. Li Kui jy took pity on him, so he spared him and gave him a piece of silver to let him go.

I don't think the author likes people like Gui Li, so he let Gui Li and Li Kui meet again and let Li Kui kill him. One is that the author can vent his anger, and the other is to make those readers agree with him. After reading him, he has a heroic temperament, as if he were Li Kui jy. It's wonderful that Li Kui jy killed Gui Li.

But later, when Li Kui jy carried his mother through Yiling, the scene of killing the tiger was the most wonderful. First, I went to fetch water, and then I found my mother missing, and I found two tigers with two legs. I killed the tiger in a rage, and the male tiger and the female tiger came to seek revenge and were killed.

Unfortunately, he killed the tiger, was invited to his house, and was caught. After reading this, everyone wants to defend Li Kui jy, which shows the author's good intentions.

Notes on the Water Margin (III) —— Resentful Lion House

Song Wu was in yanggu county and went to Beijing for business. Only when I came back did I know that my brother Wu Dalang was dead. Song Wu became suspicious and discovered the truth. He went to sue the official, but the county museum took bribes. In desperation, he avenged Wu Dalang in Lion Building.

One of the highlights is the part that killed Ximen Qing in the final revenge. Although Wu Dalang died, Pan Jinlian and Ximen Qing got the consequences she deserved, and Song Wu was sent to Mengzhou to kill the people. I think it is possible that the author is satirizing the fatuity of the imperial court at that time. Ximen Qing's description here is simply "smelly", and almost anyone who reads it will scold him a word or two, which shows how good the author describes the characters!

Reading Notes of Water Margin (IV) —— Selling Knives in Bianjing City

Yang has no money, so he has to sell his treasure knife and earn some money in another country to make a living. Who knows that when selling knives, the local ruffians and scalpers insulted them in every way, and Yang Zhi couldn't bear it anymore. He killed Niu Er and went to the newspaper office. Finally, he was sentenced to banishment to Daming House.

The most interesting scene is that Yang Zhi sells knives. First, I asked who bought the knife. After Niu Er came, I asked him to try this knife. Niu Er tried every means to obstruct and humiliate him, and was finally killed. This tells us what some hooligans were like then. Niu Er's death not only vented his anger at the characters in the book, but also made readers feel relieved after reading it. Perhaps this is what the author wrote by grasping the reader's psychology.

Notes on Water Margin (V) —— Poems of Xunyang Tower

After Song Jiang arrived in Jiangzhou, he met Shen Xing Taibao and others. One day, drinking in Xunyang Building, I wrote an anti-poem on the wall and left my name. Huang Wenbing finally met him on death row.

This incident made Song Jiang laugh and cry for the readers. I don't know what to say about him, and this episode is nothing exciting. It's just that the author can write Song Jiang to the extent that readers can't say anything about Song Jiang. It's really amazing. I can only say that Song Jiang is too confused to mention any poems. It is with this episode that we can better set off the scene of the next episode. Song Jiang's poems were robbed for a while to set off the scene of cutting the court behind him. Indeed, it is better to be with Song Jiang's poems than with others. One is that you can't say anything, and the other is that you can make them stop the court for more reasons. So I think this episode is good.

Life is the most precious thing for people, and life belongs to us only once. A man's life should be spent like this: when he looks back, he will not regret wasting his time, nor will he be ashamed of doing nothing. In this way, when he dies, he can say, "My life and all my energy have been dedicated to the most magnificent cause in the world-the struggle for the liberation of mankind."

-"How steel was tempered"

The straight mountain peak just seen from a distance stands on the throat. The mountain is like an axe, beautiful and elegant. (Case): It is ok to use "handsome" to describe "tall and straight" and "axe-cut" mountains, but it is not appropriate to use "graceful" to describe them. "Graceful" means graceful posture. How can a mountain as straight as an axe give people a soft feeling? You can change "graceful" to "tall and straight".

-A Brief Comment on Chinese.