Both Li Shimin and Judy were forced to revolt. Why is the former a wise monarch and the latter a mixed blessing?

Li Shimin, Emperor Taizong of Tang Dynasty, and Judy, Emperor Chengzu of Ming Dynasty, were both masters in English history. However, both of them have a fatal flaw-they both took the throne of their loved ones because of improper country. But because of this problem, the two have great differences in history. Why?

I think there are many reasons, and here are only two. The first reason is that the Xuanwumen rebellion was launched, which killed the eldest brother Li and the younger brother Li Yuanji. At that time, Li was only a prince, and the emperor was still. Strictly speaking, Li Shimin's killing his brother and seizing the throne did not threaten the emperor's life. Too many brothers have seized power in history. ?

Later, when he became emperor, he was still very kind and filial to Tang Gaozu in form. Judy succeeded to the throne of his nephew Zhu Yunwen. Although Zhu Yunwen was Judy's nephew, he was the undisputed Ming Emperor in the legal system at that time. Besides, Zhu Yunwen is also very kind and tolerant. He is diligent and loves the people. The essence of Judy's Jingnan War is rebellion, which is unacceptable in China's traditional Confucian concept.

The second reason is that only Li and Li Yuanji were killed, which did not cause chaos and social unrest of the ruling class. In addition, Li also adopted a policy of forgiveness for most members of the princelings, and some of them were reused, such as, and, who later made great contributions to the Tang Dynasty.

Judy's four-year civil war caused a lot of deaths and social unrest. At the same time, after Judy conquered Nanjing, his loyal ministers were punished inhumanely. The cruel history of Tie Xuan, Huang Zi Orange, Tchite and Fang Xiaoru is rare! From these two aspects, it is understandable that Judy's historical evaluation is not as good as Li Shimin's.