Is the artistic image of economists good? What do ancient witches have in common with bankers and economists in social functions?

This is the most interesting question I have ever seen, so I'm going to type a few words to answer you.

In fact, the artistic image itself is debatable. If narrowly understood as the positioning of stars and masters, economics is also a master.

For example, Nash, a talented economist, was once put into a movie and won an Oscar. (Its classical theory is Nash equilibrium)

If witches and economists have anything in common, it is prediction, but witches are divination predictions, covering a wide range, including birth and death, ups and downs, good luck and so on. Economists predict or summarize economic problems through data and phenomena.

Compared with economists, bankers are businessmen. So it can't be confused. The bounden duty of businessmen is to make profits, while the real historical mission of economists is to study and rely on research to improve social and economic life.

Economists are not understood or even ridiculed by people because of the uncertainty of their theoretical research results, which lies in human beings themselves. The study of economy is inseparable from human behavior. Man is the most complicated social animal, and accidents and exceptions can happen. Therefore, economists, mathematicians and physicists are completely different risk levels.

But at the same time, both economists and witches serve the country, and their main contribution is to maximize the interests of their own people. Most economists do.

In fact, not many people can be called "economists". Many people are only nominal, please think about it.

Landlord, since your question has been supplemented, I will repeat it. In fact, this discussion is very slow. If possible, we can discuss it through QQ or email. (QQ, 625993749, email address can also be sent to this QQ email address)

I study economics, so I have feelings for the economy, so some things may be taken care of, but I try to be objective when I answer you. One of the important reasons why people believe in witches instead of economists is that people's knowledge is growing.

Ancient times was an era of lack of information and knowledge, so witches were regarded as superpowers.

Modern times are not rich in knowledge, but information explosion. Although people have a lot of knowledge, many of them are wrong, which easily leads to misjudgment. In addition, economic research is not entirely empirical, and you may have some misunderstandings.

It is precisely because of the publicity of personality and the explosion of information that the behavior of economic individuals has changed beyond experience (for example, why do you want to put a metal ring on your stomach? Obviously, the classical theory is difficult to explain. It is precisely because of this change and particularity that it increases the difficulty of economic forecasting, and people's irrational behavior directly leads to the deviation of the results. So people don't believe in economics even more, and then a vicious circle appears.

The second question is simpler. You are caught in a misunderstanding. Bank assets are not equal to lending, let alone being loose and tight. Looseness is aimed at the country's monetary policy, which is completely different. It doesn't matter if a banker is a businessman, nor can it be a bad omen or a good omen. We can discuss the details later.

Having said so much, hehe, I wonder if it will help you.