Decipher why Huawei Kirin 950 was blown by various black Qualcomm Xiaolong 820.

Because Kirin 950 is only used by Huawei's own products, and many manufacturers of Qualcomm 820 want to use it as the processor of their flagship models. Why doesn't anyone praise Samsung 8890 for its better performance than 820? Because blowing 8890 can also suppress Huawei, but it will also suppress Qualcomm 820, which is not good for domestic manufacturers. As long as Huawei does not give the Kirin processor to other domestic mobile phone manufacturers, then other manufacturers must join hands to suppress it.

Everyone knows that a mobile phone processor GPU is only part of it. Generally speaking, 950 and 820, 8890 still have their own winners and losers, but all posts only take out the backward part of 950 and advertise it as "complete explosion", which naturally makes people confused.

Generally speaking, compared with Qualcomm and Samsung, Hisilicon does lack technology. Compared with core plus performance, Huawei's goal is to give priority to stability, otherwise it will only pit its own products. Under the balance, naturally dare not rashly. Qualcomm and Samsung's processors have strong performance, high power consumption and high fever, which put forward higher requirements for the industrial design of mobile phones. This year, 8 10 pitted a number of manufacturers, and even Sony's industrial design level could not be suppressed. Many manufacturers are forced to release low-end products one after another to maintain brand awareness. Samsung 7420 has a great advantage over 8 10 in heating, because it uses 14nm. However, although the two processors now on the market are also 14nm technology, the CPU and GPU have been enhanced a lot. Can the fever remain at the level of 7420?