Housing ownership related cases and solutions, property rights case analysis.

When it comes to housing ownership-related cases and answers, as we all know, some people ask the answer to the case analysis of property law. In addition, someone would like to ask about the housing ownership dispute. Please analyze the case. What do you need? Do you know what this is about? In fact, the case of housing ownership confirmation dispute, let's take a look at the case analysis of property rights, hoping to help everyone!

Housing ownership related cases and solutions: case analysis of property rights

According to China's Property Law, it is a classic case of housing ownership litigation.

The house belongs to real estate.

The proof of real estate ownership is real estate.

The information registered in the real estate registration department is the only proof of publicity.

Therefore, Party B is the sole owner of the house.

Party A's requirements can be raised and resolved through litigation. Real estate ownership case.

If he can prove that he has invested in the house and has a certain share, he can sue to the court to claim his rights.

Henan Cao lawyer office

A classic case about the ownership of housing reform! ! !

1. The way to identify the ownership of real estate in China is to look at the registration of real estate property rights, which is generally a house ownership certificate, that is, property rights. That is, whoever is the owner recorded in the title certificate has the real right of real estate in the world. Unless the property right is inconsistent with the registration of the registration authority, this situation is rare! I'm afraid the situation you mentioned does not belong to this exception. Because the eldest son owns the property right, he is deemed to be the owner of the house. Moreover, the real right obtained by the eldest son is an absolute right, also called the right to the world, and any third party has the obligation of inaction that may not hinder the real right holder from exercising his power.

2. Although Third Sister can register the objection according to the regulations, it is actually of little use, because even if the objection is registered, it must be prosecuted within 15 days, otherwise the objection registration will be invalid and unprotected! But the question is, what rights do the three sisters advocate? In fact, it is difficult to claim rights!

3. Even if the three sisters advocate the existence of creditor's rights relative to their brothers, creditor's rights are only a relative right relative to property rights, and they still have no right to acquire houses. Of course, they can't claim any rights from the department, that is to say, the demolition fee is only given to the relative property owner, that is, the eldest son!

If the three sisters think it is unfair, they will sue. In fact, it is also difficult to claim rights, because it is not easy to prove!

At present, the three sisters have fulfilled their obligation to support the elderly, but it is also a legal obligation! Even if the elderly have deposits and other property, as long as the elderly are still alive, there will be no legal inheritance problem. However, if the old man leaves the property under the old man's name to his children in the form of a will, it is still in line with the regulations.

Housing ownership related cases and answers: case analysis of property law The answer comes from the user: Domiku real estate ownership system case.

Disputes over the confirmation of housing ownership [Part I: case analysis of property law]

I. Case Analysis Special Topic Last month, Wang founded a "lost and found office" to register and keep all the things he found from cleaners, taxi drivers and bus drivers. , and publish lost property information through channels such as the Internet to find the owner. When the owner claims the lost property, he will charge a corresponding fee according to the different value of the lost property, of which 30% will be used as the "commission" of the finder. By 10, the business license of "Lost and Found Office" was still being processed.

Suppose: On the day of 10, Party A lost his wallet, which was full of shopping cards. The wallet was picked up by the cleaner B on the same day, and B found Wang through the notice issued by the lost and found office, and handed it over to the lost and found office for safekeeping, and agreed that the lost and found office would return the lost property to the owner according to the conditions specified in the notice, and demanded to pay the fees and remuneration, and then 30% of it would be regarded as B's "commission". On the 25th of the same year, the Lost and Found Office contacted the owner. In this process, Party B pays the necessary expenses, 50 yuan. The lost and found office pays the necessary expenses for keeping the lost property and finding the owner. Please answer the following questions according to the case: 1. Can the lost and found office ask Party A to pay the necessary fees, 50 yuan? Why? A: Yes. Because B is the picker of the wallet, when the notice of picking up is issued through the lost and found agency, the owners A and B form a debt of negotiorum gestio. In view of the agreement between Party B and the "Lost and Found Office", the mortgage established by Ai Jia Company as a financial institution with existing production equipment, semi-finished products and products will be established? Why? Which financial institution is the first mortgagee? Why? The sequence of Changping cooperative mortgage and Changping Construction Bank mortgage

The above is a case analysis of real right, which is the answer sharing of case analysis of real right law. I read the relevant cases and answers of house ownership, and hope this will help everyone!