Why is Zhouyi so accurate? What is the scientific basis?

Yijing, one of the three changes of Yijing (another view: Yijing is three changes, not Yijing), is one of the traditional classics. It is said that it was written by Zhou Wenwang Ji Chang, including the Book of Changes and biographies [1]. The classic is mainly composed of 64 hexagrams and 384 hexagrams, each of which is used for divination. The Book of Changes did not put forward the concepts of Yin and Yang and Taiji, but it was the Book of Changes that was influenced by Taoism and Yin and Yang theories. It contains seven languages * * * and ten quatrains explaining hexagrams, which are collectively called Ten Wings. It is said that it was written by Confucius. It is really difficult for different systems to evaluate each other. Similar discussions are like traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine. Arguments are flying all over the sky. Both sides hold their own words. In fact, they all say their own words and evaluate each other by their own standards. Just like measuring the temperature of this glass of water with a ruler. Do you think it's funny? This is to evaluate the feeling of oriental civilization with the standards of western scientific civilization system. Let's go back to the eastern culture itself and discuss the principles of the Book of Changes. This problem is too big. It is one of the sources of Chinese civilization, from which Huangdi's Neijing, calendar, Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism and Mohism all came out. How many sages are too poor to say I understand all their lives? So, you might as well think about this problem yourself and practice more. Maybe one day you will suddenly realize.

I experienced it personally this year. I have been studying Zhuangzi with a top scholar in Zhouyi and Taoism. Once I asked him if Zhouyi could accurately predict specific events, the 70-year-old man said brightly: How is it possible! As far as Malaysia Airlines is concerned, that time was nothing more than two possibilities: hijacking and plane crash. Generally speaking, the possibility of crashing is very high-just watch the news! As for calculating your personal information, you can refer to the paragraph when Holmes first met Watson. When they first met, Holmes concluded that Watson had been a military doctor in Afghanistan-Holmes certainly didn't understand Zhouyi. Personal opinion: "A person who studies the Book of Changes is by no means a charlatan, and even invited by a university to give lectures"-I have visited all over the world and have never even heard of such a person. Also invited to class by the university? The president of this university is probably tired of their work, life and clothes.