Why didn't anyone dare to steal Jiang Ziya's tomb for thousands of years in history? What is the reason?

I believe many people think that Jiang Ziya is a mythical figure. Because most of them make this person a household name through the romance of ghosts and gods and film and television dramas. However, literature, film and television have deified it too much, making it the first of gods. There is a saying that Jiang Ziya was here and the immortal abdicated, which shows its great influence. ?

There are people in history. Jiang Ziya, Hanoi County, Ji County, was an outstanding politician, strategist and strategist in ancient times. He was the founding father of the Zhou Dynasty. He is a late bloomer. It was not until he was over 70 years old that he made meritorious service and lived 139 years old.

His family background is prominent, and his ancestors were all officials. But when I came to see him, my family came down. When I was young, I worked as a butcher and sold wine. No matter when, he never gave up learning knowledge, so he developed a skill.

At the age of 72, he was fishing on the bank of Weihe River and met Ji Chang. Ji Chang knows people and makes good use of them, and respects a surname. Jiang Ziya assisted him in establishing hegemony and the Zhou Dynasty.

After that? Feudal relatives, with Fan? He was sealed in the Diqi camp and established the State of Qi. Jiang Ziya manages the country well, respects talents and makes great contributions to the long-term stability of the country.

But he was not a god after all, and died in Haojing, the capital of Zhou Dynasty, at the age of 139. Then the problem is coming. The ancients died, and people like Jiang Ziya had to be buried. Then why hasn't anyone dared to steal his tomb for thousands of years?

There is a saying that Jiang Ziya's position among the people is transcendent and immortal. Later generations also hold him in high esteem, and emperors, generals, literary and historical classics all respect Jiang Ziya as the originator of military strategists, the warrior sage and the master of a hundred schools of thought. Jiang Ziya is also familiar with astronomy and geography, so his tomb is unusual in geomantic omen.

Grave robbers are so superstitious that they dare not rashly attack this immortal tomb for fear of an accident. So Jiang Ziya escaped the grave robbery.

However, this is not the case at all Grave robbers are extremely arrogant. Whose tomb is the ancient emperor with bad feng shui? But do people like Cao Cao and Sun Dianying care about this? Isn't stealing ambiguous?

I think there are two main reasons why Jiang Ziya's tomb was not stolen.

First, no one knows where Jiang Ziya's tomb is. "Unified chronicle of the qing dynasty? Xi anzhou? Historic site, Tailing Mausoleum is located in the northeast of Xianyang County.

According to the Book of Rites, the squire was sealed in Yingqiu, more than in Zhou.

According to Yuan, the tomb is ten miles northeast of the county seat.

"The whole world", 25 miles northeast of the county seat.

Tongzhi: In the northeast of Wenwangling.

"Henan Tongzhi" contains: In Taigong Spring, northwest of Fucheng, I once sheltered in the coast of the East China Sea, then moved to Weibin, sealed the country in Qi, and was buried here.

The exact location is still controversial. Even if a grave robber breaks his leg, he may not find it.

Second, although Jiang Ziya was a monarch, he was indifferent to fame and fortune all his life. He didn't care much about what was behind him, so he asked for a thin burial after death. In that case, his tomb is very simple to manage, and it is estimated that there is nothing valuable in it.

Although this statement has no basis. But the grave robbers couldn't find the exact location of the tomb, so they deluded themselves into believing this statement and stopped looking for it.

Grave robbers can't get up early. Therefore, Jiang Ziya's tomb has not been stolen for thousands of years, mainly because it is very old. There are many sayings about his tomb site, so grave robbers can't find it at all, not for other reasons.