Relations between Ukraine and Russia

The tension between Ukraine and Russia is mainly because the pro-Western policy of the Ukrainian government makes Russia dissatisfied, and Ukraine's entry into NATO has further squeezed Russia's living space, so the relationship between Ukraine and Russia is tense in the present form! Last year, the Crimean War and the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine occurred, but Ukraine has no intention of withdrawing from the CIS.

The gratitude and resentment between Russia and Ukraine after the disintegration of the Soviet Union;

(Tell the relationship between them in historical order)

Rome was not built in a day. If you understand the earlier feud between Russia and Ukraine, you will feel reasonable about the development of the current situation.

1. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Russia and Ukraine, the two largest countries in the Commonwealth of Independent States, fought fiercely around the armed forces of the former Soviet Union, the greatest legacy left by the former alliance, mainly in the following three aspects:

First, there are different opinions on whether to continue to maintain the unified armed forces of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Russia advocates the establishment of a unified armed force of the Commonwealth of Independent States under its control, while Ukraine demands the establishment of its own independent army on the basis of the former Soviet troops stationed in its territory. At the CIS summit, there were many disputes between the two sides. In the end, despite Russian opposition, Ukraine decided to formally establish an independent army with a total strength of 420,000-450,000 troops on 10 1992+3 1 day, realizing its long-cherished wish. Russia had to admit this fact, and then in May of the same year, it issued a document to form its own armed forces, which made this disagreement go away.

The second is the ownership of the Black Sea Fleet. Russia believes that the Black Sea Fleet is a strategic force and should be placed under the unified command of the Commonwealth of Independent States, saying that "this fleet has always been Russian and cannot be ceded to anyone", while Ukraine claims that the main base of the Black Sea Fleet is Ukraine. The total investment of Ukraine's former Soviet navy is as high as 25%, while the Black Sea Fleet only accounts for 17%, so it should be owned by Ukraine. The views of the two sides are sharply opposed. Although many negotiations have been conducted and some agreements have been reached, they have not really been implemented, making this issue an unsolved case.

The third is about Uzbekistan's nuclear weapons. Russia proposes to hand over all nuclear weapons to Russia, and Russia is unilaterally responsible for security. Under pressure from all sides, Ukraine once agreed to send nuclear weapons to Russia, but it was delayed for various reasons and has not been handed over yet. The differences between the two sides still exist.

We all know that "in Ukraine" in Russian is not "вукраине", but "наукнн". But now it means "in Ukraine" in Russian. What is this? This is because the name Ukraine was not the name of a nation or a country at first. It is a "border land" in the southwest of Gullas. In old Russian, Ukraine means "the place near the border" and "the place where the country borders". In fact, before the disintegration of the former Soviet Union, Ukrainians always used the expression наукраине. However, since the disintegration, countries joined by the former Soviet Union, such as Ukraine, have changed from countries with relatively weak independence to truly independent sovereign countries, and the people of the former countries have an unprecedented sense of national independence, which is reflected in all aspects actively demanding the due status of independent sovereign countries, and Ukrainians are no exception. At the same time, this upsurge of national independence has also been reflected in language. Therefore, Ukrainians are no longer willing to continue the наукраине before the disintegration.

2. Speaking of the feud between Russia and Ukraine, we have to turn over a thick history. Let's talk about the first treaty signed between Ukraine and Russia more than 300 years ago-the Treaty of Peleyaslav in Ukraine 1654 ... According to the provisions of the treaty, Ukraine enjoys a high degree of autonomy after its alliance with Russia, but it has not actually achieved the status of an independent country, and it has to pay taxes to the Tsar government. But in fact, more than that, after several years of war, Ukraine's economic and military strength can not be compared with Russia, a powerful country in Eastern Europe at that time. The disparity in strength determines the inequality of Ukrainian-Russian relations and Russia's dominant position in Ukraine, laying the development framework of Ukrainian-Russian relations. This unequal ethnic relationship has caused various contradictions and has played a negative role in the development of Ukrainian-Russian relations so far.

As we all know, Ukraine and Russia are the two most important countries in the CIS, and the relationship between Ukraine and Russia will have a great impact on the stability and future of the CIS and the strategic pattern of Europe. The relationship between Ukraine and Russia is very special. This particularity is the key to grasp the development of Ukrainian-Russian relations and determines the boundary between Ukrainian-Russian cooperation and conflict.

In fact, from the founding of the Soviet Union in 1922 to the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 199 1, the survival and development of Ukraine depended on the interests and needs of the Russian nation, the main ethnic group of the Soviet Union. Ukraine and Russia have been allied for 300 years since 1954. Especially in the Soviet Union, the two ethnic groups merged and influenced each other in many aspects, such as politics, economy and culture, and formed a deep and close relationship. This long-term intertwined interest relationship will not stop because of the independence of the two peoples. For Ukraine, its political stability and economic development depend largely on Russia. Developing relations with Russia plays an important role in Ukraine's difficult process of consolidating national security and improving its political, economic and international status. In Russia's eyes, Ukraine is not only Russia's economic partner, but more importantly, the current situation of Ukrainian-Russian relations is directly related to Russia's strategic interests. The disintegration of the Soviet Union, the disintegration of the Warsaw Pact, and the collapse of the European regional security system formed after World War II. In the process of forming the new European security structure, the whole of Eastern Europe was brought into Russia's strategic interests, and Ukraine occupied an important position. Russia's traffic lifeline passes through Ukraine (natural gas and oil pipelines exported by Russia to Eastern and Central European countries pass through Ukraine), and it also needs Ukraine to maintain Russia's presence in the Balkans, the Mediterranean Sea, the Transnistrian River and the Black Sea. If the relationship between Ukraine and Russia is maintained in a good state, Russia can maintain its influence in the above areas more easily, otherwise, Russia's interests will be damaged.

4. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the comprehensive national strength of Ukraine and Russia is very different. In the CIS, Russia still occupies a central position, is in a leading position in economic reform, has a vast market and natural resources unmatched by other countries, and has a decisive influence on the situation in the CIS, while Ukraine is at an obvious disadvantage. Worried that history repeats itself, Russia is regarded as the main threat to Ukraine's national security. Former Ukrainian President kravchuk regarded Russia as a lion sleeping beside Ukraine, ready to devour Ukraine. Therefore, Ukraine has always been on guard against Russia, and Ukraine's suspicion and vigilance against Russia have cast a heavy shadow on the development of Ukrainian-Russian relations.

1February 1992 14, Ukraine established diplomatic relations with Russia at the ambassadorial level. The relationship between Ukraine and Russia has achieved a historic breakthrough. After the establishment of diplomatic relations between Ukraine and Russia, the basic characteristics of the relations between the two countries are sometimes tense and sometimes relaxed. In Ukrainian-Russian relations, historical grievances and realistic interests are intertwined and complicated. The division of the Black Sea Fleet, Crimea and the destruction of nuclear weapons are the three leading factors affecting the development of Ukrainian-Russian relations.

In addition, the feud between Russia and Ukraine in recent years has gradually accumulated contradictions between the two countries. After Russia stopped supplying natural gas to Ukraine on the grounds of Ukraine's arrears, more and more factors were involved. At first, Russia accused Ukraine of privately intercepting natural gas destined for Europe, and then Russia stopped transmitting gas to Europe through Ukrainian pipelines, so the gas stoppage storm quickly spread to Europe, and the EU immediately began to mediate. Europeans unscrewed the valve of the gas pipeline and found that there was no expected natural gas, and it was "the gas didn't hit one place." A wave of unrest, another wave. Ukraine requires Russia to provide 2 1 10,000 cubic meters of natural gas free of charge every day on the grounds that it needs technical gas. At the same time, it was announced that the price of natural gas provided by Russia was $450, which was unacceptable. Russia, on the other hand, demands to recover 1.654380+ billion dollars lost by Gazprom due to Ukraine's obstruction to stop its natural gas trade with Europe.

In the long run, the contradiction is getting deeper and deeper, and Russia is undoubtedly the biggest protagonist of this storm. On the surface, Russia stopped supplying gas to Ukraine because Ukraine failed to repay its $2 billion natural gas debt. However, the discerning eye can see at a glance that the "bitter atmosphere" of Russia and Ukraine over the years has never been just a question of money, and there is a far-reaching political and economic background behind it.

As we all know, since Ukraine's "color revolution" in 2005, Ukraine has adopted a foreign policy of being pro-Western and foil Russia, actively seeking to join the European Union, especially NATO, and formed a "GUAM Group" with some other CIS countries, hollowing out the foundation of Russia. In the Russian-Georgian conflict, Ukraine actively supported Georgia's political and military confrontation with Russia. Among them, Ukraine's active application to join NATO is regarded by Russia as an unacceptable bottom line, which is a key step for the United States and the West to attempt to surround and squeeze Russia in geostrategy. Therefore, it is expected that Russia will seize the opportunity to beat Ukraine. Due to objective reasons, Ukraine is highly dependent on Russia in energy, and this weakness has become a very convenient attack tool for Russia. Therefore, the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine is actually a two-pronged strategy of politics and economy. The purpose of Russia's two-pronged approach is not only to warn Ukraine, but to achieve a variety of purposes.

Of course, first of all, remind Ukraine not to go too far on the road of anti-Russia. Ukraine has no way out. Russia has various ways to restrict Ukraine. Ukraine cannot be politically unfavorable to Russia, but on the other hand, it must enjoy the benefits brought by Russia's convenient and cheap energy. Secondly, through the "grievances" with Ukraine, Russia also intends to prove to the EU that if Russia is angry, the consequences will be very serious.

7. Let's turn our attention to the heart diseases of Ukraine and Russia in those days, that is, the division of the Black Sea fleet, the Crimea issue and the destruction of nuclear weapons. Let's start with the Black Sea Fleet.

The Black Sea Fleet was founded in 1783 by the famous empress Catherine II in Russian history. How awesome is this fleet? Let's just say that it is a historical witness to the development of the Russian navy and the glory and pride of Russia. When the Soviet Union was liberated, the Black Sea Fleet had 97,000 officers and men and 45 large surface ships, including aircraft carriers (Kuznetsov), helicopter carriers (Moscow and St. Petersburg), 10 destroyers, 30 frigates, 100 cruise ships and coastal frigates, 60 minesweepers, 5 landing ships and 50 rescue ships. The Marine Corps of the Black Sea Fleet is equipped with 360 cars. Simferopol has 126 Motorized Division, equipped with 270 tanks, 300 armored vehicles and 300 infantry vehicles. The total value of warships of the Black Sea Fleet is $7.045 billion. This fleet is the only one in the CIS region that does not freeze in winter. The most important part of the coastal facilities of the Black Sea Fleet is concentrated in Ukraine, mainly in Crimea. Sevastopol has four ports, which can dock warships of any level. This was definitely the leader of a maritime power at that time.

Before the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Russia had been controlling the Black Sea region with the help of the Black Sea Fleet. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Russia's geopolitical position in the Black Sea region changed. The Black Sea Fleet is no longer a factor to ensure regional stability, but a bargaining chip in political struggle. However, the Black Sea region is still of great significance to Russia. First of all, whether to control the Black Sea area is related to the national security of Russia's southern border. In addition, the Black Sea is a region where Russia's economic interests are concentrated, and it is the only water passage for Russia to the Mediterranean and Pacific regions. We can see the importance of the Black Sea and the Black Sea Fleet to Russia from the following passage: "If we continue not to provide financial and material support such as funds, spare parts, fuel and personnel to the fleet, then our naval strength in the Baltic Sea will lag behind Sweden and Germany before 2000, and it will lag far behind Turkey in the Black Sea region. If Russia does not have naval power in the region, then Russia's geopolitical status will go back to 200-300 years ago. "

In this case, the division of the Black Sea Fleet involves not only property issues, but also national sovereignty and national security interests, which is very difficult. In Russia's view, losing the Black Sea Fleet means losing control of the Black Sea region. In Ukraine's view, the existence of the Black Sea Fleet in Ukraine also means the loss of sovereignty. On the division of the Black Sea Fleet, Russia should maintain its presence in the Black Sea region, while Ukraine should weaken Russia's influence in this region to safeguard its own security. Therefore, the ownership of the Black Sea Fleet has become an extremely sensitive issue in the political life of Ukraine and Russia. Later, the leaders of the two sides communicated many times, and the progress has not been smooth. Until1May 28th, 1997, Russian Prime Minister chernomyrdin visited Ukraine, and the prime ministers of Ukraine and Russia finally signed relevant documents. The two sides reached an understanding on the following issues: Russia confirmed Crimea and Sevastopol as Ukrainian territory, and Russia agreed to lease Sevastopol (for a period of 20 years) for the Russian Black Sea Fleet to berth. Sevastopol is no longer the main base of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, but the main fleet base of the Ukrainian Navy.

At this time, the coastal defense system of the Black Sea Fleet was destroyed 100%, the command system was destroyed by 70%, the logistics support and technical maintenance system was paralyzed by 72%, and the reconnaissance system was completely destroyed. The remaining troops even became a problem, and it was impossible to form a strategic strike team. Even if this fragmented and almost paralyzed fleet exists, it is still in name only.

8. On the issue of Crimea, the Crimean Peninsula is the only autonomous republic of Ukraine. It is located at the southernmost tip of Ukraine, bordering the Black Sea in the south and the Sea of Azov in the east. There is no land connection with Russia, covering an area of about 27,000 square kilometers. Most of them are Russians (in Sevastopol, the Russian population accounts for more than 2/3), as well as Ukrainians, some Tatars and other ethnic minorities. Its capital has been established. Crimea has a subtropical climate, with no severe cold in winter and no heat in summer. It has a pleasant climate and beautiful scenery. It is a famous tourist attraction in the Soviet Union. Everything was fine, but for various reasons, this treasure has become a heart disease between Russia and Ukraine.

Crimea's military strategic position is very important. Under the rule of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union for 200 years, a complete set of military and military port bases have been established here. It has natural ports such as Kerch, Sevastopol and Yevpatori, among which Sevastopol is a deep-water ice-free port, and has established a set of supporting facilities (ports, airports, railways, warehouses and maintenance bases). The Black Sea Fleet Command, one of the four largest naval fleets of the Soviet Union, is stationed in Sevastopol to ensure the safety of the Soviet Union's sea passage to Europe and the world. In history, 1443- 1783 all ethnic groups established the Crimean state. 1475- 1774 The country became a slave of Turkey. 16- 17 th century, the Cossacks in Zaporoze waged war against the Turkish Tatars, and the Russian army took the opportunity to go to Crimea (1687- 1689). 1783, Crimea was formally annexed by Russia. 192110/0 18, as a member of the Russian Federation, the Crimean Soviet Socialist Autonomous Republic was established. After World War II, 1945 was renamed Crimea.

The Crimean peninsula has always been under Russian jurisdiction. 1944, Stalin's government forced Crimean Tatars to move to other villages on the charge of "collaborating with Hitler's occupiers". This policy not only worsened the relationship between Russians and Tatars, but also caused great losses to Crimea's economy. After Khrushchev came to power, in order to ease the ethnic contradictions in this region and revitalize the peninsula economy, 1954, 19 In February, to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the merger of Ukraine and Russia (1654), Ukraine and Russia signed the Peleyaslav Agreement, according to which the two countries merged. ), Crimea was included in Ukraine by Russia. 199 1 year, the Soviet Union disintegrated and Crimea joined Ukraine as an autonomous Republic, which was recognized by the international community. Russia has always been worried about this. On May 2 1 65438 and February 1992 1954, the Russian Parliament unilaterally passed resolutions on abolishing the transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine, and on July 9 1993, it passed a decree on the recovery of Sevastopol, an important naval base city in Crimea. Although it is inconvenient for Russia to openly make territorial claims against Ukraine, it is also unwilling to give up Crimea. This is because since18th century, Crimea has been the base for Russia to control the Black Sea coast, the Mediterranean Sea and the Balkans. Crimea's geographical position makes it the key to control the Black Sea region, especially the western part of the Black Sea. Without Crimea, Russia's imperial position in the Black Sea and its political influence on the Mediterranean region will become a problem. Maintaining its influence on Crimea is an important factor for Russia to maintain its status as a big country and restrict Ukraine politically, economically and militarily. Crimea is a multi-ethnic region dominated by Russians. Russia's cultural influence has always been dominant, while Ukraine's cultural influence is weak. Most residents only speak Russian, and Russian newspapers and magazines are many times more than Ukrainian. Only a few Crimean people watch Kiev TV programs.

9. After the independence of Ukraine, Ukrainian nationalist forces once played an important role in social and political life, and other ethnic groups were discriminated against. Under this circumstance, the Russian people in Crimea are gaining the momentum of returning to Russia or independence. In addition, in 1944, Crimean Tatars who moved to other villages were forced to return to Crimea by Stalin's government on the charge of "collaborating with Hitler's occupiers", which also made the ethnic relations in this area more complicated. The continuous deterioration of the economy and living environment is the direct cause of the turmoil in Crimea.

The Ukrainian government is well aware that the economic crisis is the main source of the Crimean issue. Therefore, while taking political measures, we decided to increase economic assistance to Crimea. Coupled with a series of measures taken by the Ukrainian central government, the situation in Crimea has undergone positive changes that are conducive to Ukraine's domestic stability.

After several twists and turns, Russia finally did not return Crimea. Later, in order to strengthen mutual trust and cooperation, the leaders of both sides made concessions on this matter as much as possible. At that time, the Russian President, Parliament and Government stated on various occasions that the Crimean issue was an internal affair of Ukraine.

But now I hear that there is a "leading party" in Crimea. This time, Russian troops were stationed in Crimea. As can be seen from the picture, on the outskirts of Simferopol, Crimea, Ukraine, an uncle holding a Russian flag walks in front and leads a group of Russian army infantry. Regardless of the identity of this uncle. First of all, for Ukraine, the coming will always come, because the lion sleeping next to it is simply pretending to sleep, and for the Russian residents of Crimea, the coming has finally come. In any case, for Ukraine, it is always me who gets hurt. Next, let's talk about nuclear weapons.

1. The Soviet Union has a large number of nuclear weapons. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, 2000 tactical nuclear weapons of Ukraine were transported to Russia for destruction in May 1992. The issue of nuclear weapons between Ukraine and Russia mainly refers to how to deal with Ukraine's strategic nuclear weapons after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. 199 1 year, after the disintegration of the Soviet union, Ukraine left a large number of strategic nuclear weapons. These weapons include 176 interstate missiles (which can carry 1240 nuclear warheads), including 46 SS-24 missiles with 10 warheads each, and 130 SS- 19 missiles with 6 warheads each. There are also 2 1 bear -H bombers and 16 pirate flag bombers, both of which can carry cruise missiles, including 1800 nuclear missiles and two missile bases.

What position Ukraine will take on its strategic nuclear weapons after independence is the focus of attention of the United States, western countries and Russia. In order to gain the trust of these countries and support Ukraine's independence,1In July 1990, the Ukrainian parliament declared Ukraine a nuclear-free country. In fact, to be honest, as far as Ukraine is concerned, it was impossible to hold these things at that time. Of course, Ukraine's nuclear-free policy has been welcomed by all countries in the world, especially western countries. But in terms of strength, Ukraine is still unable to maintain its status as a nuclear power. Ukraine not only lacks the necessary infrastructure for nuclear command and control, maintenance and testing, but also lacks funds. According to the western estimation at that time, Ukraine needed 62-10 billion dollars to build nuclear weapons research, production, maintenance and other related infrastructure. This does not include the cost of upgrading the strategic nuclear weapons deployed by the Soviet Union in Ukraine. According to experts' prediction, these nuclear weapons still have a safety period of 10-20 years. After the safety period, it needs to be completely replaced, otherwise the consequences will be unimaginable. Obviously, this is beyond the affordability of the Ukrainian economy.

However, Ukraine does not want to implement the denuclearization policy unconditionally. How to obtain international security and economic compensation while withdrawing and destroying nuclear weapons in order to solve the economic problems faced by Ukraine is the main prerequisite for the Ukrainian government to implement the denuclearization policy. The conditions proposed by Ukraine are: 1. Ukraine will participate in the negotiations with the United States as an equal successor of the Soviet Union, which has been agreed by both the United States and Russia. 2. Seek safety; 3. Ask for economic compensation. Later, a tug-of-war was launched on the issue of nuclear weapons. For various reasons, the two sides failed to reach an agreement. Later, Clinton, then president of the United States, visited Moscow. After several rounds of negotiations, President Clinton, Russian President Yeltsin and Ukrainian President kravchuk finally signed a tripartite agreement to destroy Ukraine's nuclear weapons in Moscow on 1994 14 10/4. Finally, the strategic nuclear warhead was withdrawn from Ukrainian territory on June 1 96, and the missile silo was successfully destroyed on June 1 96. Since then, the issue of nuclear weapons has finally come to an end.

1 1. Now, the turbulent situation in Ukraine is escalating. The president has left the parliament and left for a meeting. Ukraine is sandwiched between the European Union and Russia, and it is teetering. For Ukraine, it is always a difficult problem to choose to rely on Russia or the EU. Just a few months ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin said: "Ukraine has no plans to join the EU at present. According to expert assessment, the signing of the contact country agreement between Ukraine and the EU will have a clear and very serious impact on Ukraine's economic environment. " Putin explained that under the above circumstances, it is difficult for customers to identify the trademark and origin of goods, which will put Russian manufacturers in a "very embarrassing situation."

Looking back on the previous signs, Russia has already been gearing up. A few months ago, Russian customs stepped up its inspection of Ukrainian imports. All goods must undergo unloading inspection, and there must be ST- 1 document (proving that the goods are produced in Ukraine). This has led to a large number of Ukrainian export commodities stranded on the Ukrainian-Russian border, thus forming a large-scale traffic jam. Although the Russian government claimed that the strict investigation measures of the Russian Federal Customs were decided by itself, Ukrainian experts believed that because Ukraine planned to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union, the Russian Customs acted according to the instructions of the government and put pressure on Ukraine. Then, the Ukrainian delegation led by Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Boico flew to Moscow to meet with Russian First Deputy Prime Minister igor Shuvalov to discuss customs issues. The Ukrainian Ministry of Taxation subsequently stated that the General Administration of Customs of the Russian Federation had resumed normal customs clearance procedures for goods imported from Ukraine. However, just one day ago, Russian Presidential Advisor Sergei Grady said that if Ukraine joined the EU Free Trade Area, Russia would cancel the bilateral free trade agreement with Ukraine.

Putin's statement is the final conclusion of the short-term border trade dispute between Russia and Ukraine. Former Ukrainian President Viktor viktor yushchenko believes that Ukrainian exporters have become "hostages" of Russian leaders trying to prevent Ukraine from joining the EU. In fact, the "hostages" in Russia's hands are far more than Ukrainian exporters. For example, the gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine in early 2009 directly affected Europe 18 countries. Comparatively speaking, Russia's fight against Ukraine this time can only be regarded as a "small move."

12. It is always a dilemma for Ukraine whether the EU is a customs union or Europe is Russia. According to the data of Ukrainian data company, in the first half of 20 13, Ukraine exported 6.4 billion dollars of goods and raw materials to Russia and imported 8.4 billion dollars, with a trade deficit of 2 billion dollars. Ukraine's exports of raw materials and commodities to the EU were US$ 7.3 billion, while its imports were US$ 654.38+007 billion, with a deficit of US$ 3 billion. In terms of export commodity structure, Ukraine mainly exports metallurgical, mechanical engineering and power engineering products to Russia, while mainly exports agricultural products to the European Union. The trade volume of Ukraine is similar to that of Russia and Europe, and the trade structure does not overlap each other. It can be said that the loss of any party's trade market is an unbearable loss for Ukraine.

Questions that cannot be answered at the economic level may be discussed at the humanistic level. A survey shows that in recent years, more and more Ukrainians have chosen Egypt, Greece, Spain and Italy as summer vacation destinations. Only about one-sixth of people choose to go to Russia, and most of them go to Russia to visit relatives, mainly middle-aged and elderly people over 40. In particular, young people from 16 to 19 are strongly recommended to travel to Europe. A young Ukrainian told reporters that in the six years after he worked, he almost traveled all over Europe, but he has never been to Russia once, and most of the young people around him have been there.

However, everything has an unpredictable side. Russia, which just hosted the Winter Olympics and won world acclaim, unexpectedly "lost" Ukraine during the Olympic Games. The dramatic collapse of Ukrainian pro-Russian President Yanukovych's regime is a major reversal of the Russian government. Just a few weeks ago, Russia seemed to have successfully brought Ukraine back to its own camp, but now Ukraine may be closer to the West. Coupled with the Russian army in Ukraine, the farce of backyard fire continues to happen. Do they really like Russia? I don't think so, of course, there is no exception, but looking at the feud between Russia and Ukraine for hundreds of years, I always feel that it is boring to let outsiders interfere in family affairs. Therefore, after the Russian army entered the Crimean Peninsula, the Ukrainian interim president accused the Russian army of its actions in Crimea, Ukraine, saying that Russia's actions were "obvious aggression and threats." The US Secretary of State also imposed military sanctions on the threat of Russian military action in Ukraine. Britain, Germany and the European Union have also expressed their views, and the "strength" of all parties has made the situation in Ukraine even more tense. However, the chairman of the Russian Federation Council said that Russia and Ukraine are "brother countries and will never go to war" on the risks worried by the outside world.

The dismembered figure -22M