Fortune Telling Collection - Fortune-telling birth date - The 72-year-old man died while whoring, and his children demanded compensation of 200,000 yuan from the woman who slipped. What is the court's decision?

The 72-year-old man died while whoring, and his children demanded compensation of 200,000 yuan from the woman who slipped. What is the court's decision?

The 72-year-old man died while whoring, and his children demanded compensation of 200,000 yuan from the woman who slipped. In the end, the court rejected the demands of the elderly children because their demands were illegal.

Zhang Laohan was hospitalized because of heart problems, and he also had a heart stent construction operation. After leaving the hospital, the doctor also told Zhang Laohan not to be too excited and often came to the hospital for review. On the fifth day after Zhang Laohan was discharged from the hospital, he went to see the woman Xiao Fang who slipped.

In the process of their communication, Zhang Laohan suddenly lost his temper. Xiaofang also realized that Zhang Laohan was wrong, called the emergency number and gave Zhang Laohan cardiac resuscitation. Even so, Zhang Laohan failed to survive. Autopsy showed that Zhang Laohan died of myocardial infarction.

Zhang Laohan's family brought Xiao Fang to court with a complaint, arguing that Xiao Fang's illegal and criminal acts violated Zhang Laohan's right to life and health, and demanded compensation for death, funeral expenses, mental damages and other losses totaling 200,000 yuan.

When Zhang Laohan was discharged from the hospital, the doctor repeatedly told Zhang Laohan not to get too excited. Zhang Laohan engaged in illegal activities while knowing that he was in poor health, and he had a major fault. Xiaofang called the emergency number when Zhang Laohan was ill. Before the emergency personnel arrived, Xiaofang carried out the necessary emergency actions for Zhang Laohan.

In this case, Xiaofang could not foresee the death of Zhang Laohan, and there was no fault in his subjective will, so Xiaofang did not have to bear civil compensation. According to Article 175 of the Civil Code, the damage was caused by the victim intentionally and the perpetrator was not responsible. In the end, the court rejected the appeal of Zhang Laohan's family.