There are four chopsticks in the bowl.

The fortune teller said that there was a great disaster in a certain month and year, and it should be resolved.

If the fortune-teller is proficient in eight characters and makes scientific analysis, he can definitely work it out. If he is a charlatan, it's hard to say. As for whether the witch can be dissolved, I mean that it is not reliable to rely on deception such as so-called practice. Four-column prediction is a science. Since it is scientific, it should be solved in a scientific way. For example, if you figure out which direction someone is in a certain month, you can go in the direction of disaster this month and naturally resolve it. As for whether fortune telling is superstitious or not, it should be tested by practice. It is not a scientific attitude to affirm or deny anything easily. Some people will say that fortune telling is effective, so why are some people not allowed? For example, just like a doctor. If the doctor speaks highly of your illness, you will say that the doctor's medical skill is very good. If not, you will say that doctors are not good at medical skills, but few people doubt that "practicing medicine" is a feudal superstition. However, fortune tellers seem to be less tolerant. If they are accurate, they are liars. Don't you know that fortune tellers are also divided into masters and mediocrities? Finally, practice is the only criterion for testing truth.