Chinese Composition Unit 6, Grade 6

James Palisse (I think I should call him Professor James Palisse. Although I didn't mention his title, I'm sure everyone knows who I mean) always speaks slowly.

I know. I have interviewed him many times. He has the greatest mind since Einstein, but it is not agile. He admitted that he was slow. Maybe it's because his brain is too big to think quickly.

He often speaks slowly and absently, then he thinks about it, and then he says a few words. Even when he talks about trivial things, his giant's thinking will be pulled east and west.

Will the sun shine tomorrow? I can imagine his indecision. What do we mean by "going out"? Are we sure that tomorrow will definitely come? Is the word "Sun" appropriate here?

With this habit of speaking, coupled with a slightly pale and plain face, there is always no expression except the usual hesitant expression; There is also neatly combed, slightly gray hair; A well-tailored old straight suit; James poop; The image of Chris came alive-a completely unattractive and withdrawn person.

That's why no one in the world will suspect him of being a murderer except myself. I'm not even sure. After all, he is slow in thinking; He is always slow in thinking. Can you imagine that he will cheer up, think quickly and act quickly at a critical moment?

It's no use. Even if he killed someone, he had escaped safely. It's too late to reverse the case now, even if I decide to publish this article, it won't help. Edward Bloom is a college classmate in Palisse, and some of his colleagues have been working for a long time, lasting for twenty or thirty years. They are the same age, some are single, but other than that, everything else is the opposite. Bloom is tall and burly, with a loud voice, impatient and confident, and stands out like a bolt of lightning. His mind, like a meteor, can catch the essence of the problem unexpectedly in an instant. Pu; Liss is a theorist, but he is not; Bloom has no patience to do that, and he can't concentrate on a single abstract theory. He admitted this and was complacent about it. He has a magical talent: he is good at putting theory into practice and trying his best to provide it to people. He can easily realize the complex design of a wonderful device from the cold marble of abstract structure. As long as he plays a trick or two, the stone will be transformed into that device. There is a very popular saying, which is not very exaggerated. What Bloom has done has never been invalid, never patented, and never unprofitable. When he was 45 years old, he was already one of the richest people in the world. If technical expert Bloom has to rely on something special, it is the thinking method of theoretical expert Palisse. Bloom's greatest new inventions all originated from the greatest ideas, but when Bloom's wealth and prestige are increasing day by day, Pu; Lise won special respect among his colleagues.

So, in Pu; When Liss put forward two theories, Bloom will immediately start to make the first anti-gravity device for practical application, which naturally becomes a matter to be observed.

My task is to introduce people's concern about OMELCO theory to the subscribers of "Telecom News Agency". To finish this job, you must try to deal with people, not abstract concepts. As my interviewee is Professor Palisse, this job is not easy.

Of course, what I want to ask is the possibility of anti-gravity that everyone is interested in, not two theories that no one understands.

"Anti-gravity?" Palisse pursed his pale lips and thought, "I'm not entirely sure that this is possible, or that it is possible." I haven't fully figured out whether the two field equations will have perfect solutions, they must have them. . . . Of course. . . If. . . "He left this topic, lost in thought.

I challenged him verbally: "Bloom said he thought he could build such a device."

Palisse nodded. "Yes, yes, but I doubt it. Ed Bloom used to have amazing unique skills. He has extraordinary intelligence. That really made him rich. "

We sat in an ordinary middle-class apartment in Palisse. I couldn't help glancing aside. To be honest, Palisse is not rich.

I don't think he has read my mind. He saw me looking around, and I think he felt the same way. He said: Pure scientists usually get rewards that are not wealth, and that is not even what they particularly expect. "

I think maybe so. Palisse got different rewards. He is the third person to win the Nobel Prize twice in history and the first person to enjoy the natural science project award alone twice. There is nothing to complain about. If he is not rich, he is not poor anyway.

But he doesn't sound like a contented man. Perhaps it was Bloom's wealth that annoyed Palisse; Perhaps there is Bloom's great popularity among the people on earth. Wherever he goes, he is regarded as a celebrity, while Palisse is not famous outside scientific conferences and university teachers' clubs.

I can't say how much my eyes or my wrinkled forehead revealed these thoughts, but Palisse spoke again: "However, we are friends. You know, we play billiards once or twice a week, and I usually beat him. "

I have never made the above remarks. I also checked with Bloom, and he retorted for a long time, saying, "He beat me at billiards? That idiot. . . . "The following words are closer to personal attacks. In fact, they are all novices in billiards. After the above statement and refutation. Once I saw them playing for a while, both of them had the composure of a professional player. And both of them are red-eyed when playing, so I don't see any friendship in this game at all. )

I said, "Would you like to talk about whether Bloom will start building anti-gravity devices?"

"You mean to ask me if I would like to make a statement? Well, well, let me think, young man. But what do we mean by anti-gravity? Our concept of gravity is based on Einstein's general theory of relativity. Although this theory has existed for a century and a half, its description is still impeccable. We can describe it. . . . "

I listened politely. I have heard Palisse talk about this topic before. But if I want something from him (which is not certain), I must let him finish this sentence in his own way.

"We can describe this theory," he said. "Please imagine the universe as a thin, flat, flexible and unbreakable rubber sheet. If the concept of mass is associated with the concept of the earth's surface, it can be considered that mass will make the rubber plate form a depression. The bigger the lump, the deeper the depression. " "We can describe this theory," he said. "Please imagine the universe as a flat, thin and flexible rubber sheet that won't break. . . When we associate the concept of mass with the concept of the weight of the earth's surface, we can think that mass will cause the rubber plate to form a depression. The bigger the lump, the deeper the depression. "