Some ideas for short-term introduction to stocks are welcome to consult.

A few years older than you, so is the stock age. Let me point out a few mistakes in your statement first:

Most of the technical indicators of 1 cannot be ignored: all the technical indicators are reasonable and have their own reasonable places, and their existence itself shows their value. Hegel said that existence is reasonable! The key is to use it correctly in the right place and give full play to its power. Different people have different sensitivities to different indicators. Li Yuqing likes MACD, I like RSI, Gao Huan Wen likes watching KDJ and BIAS, Yang Baiwan likes watching BOLL, and so on.

Technical indicators often fail. Many people regard this as the weakness of technical indicators and say: technical indicators are useless at all. Look, they are not accurate at all.

However, in fact, the failure of technical indicators is of great significance to American technical analysts. Let me give you an example. Last year, in the 6000-point bull market, the MACD of the daily K-line declined, but the stock index was still at a new high. This is an obvious top deviation. At this point, far-sighted technical experts seem to be avoiding risks. In a bear market, MACD often deviates from the bottom. At this time, technicians dare to enter the field. Even if the low position is temporarily quilted, once it is pulled up, it is often the first to profit.

Every skilled craftsman has a toolbox, and there is no way to mix tricks in the stock market. Therefore, I suggest you don't underestimate the efforts of your predecessors. These indicators have a good effect. The key is to learn to choose a few that suit you best at different times.

2 stock evaluation can not be ignored. I don't blame you for thinking this way. Many stock reviews that tell lies with their eyes open and mislead retail investors are really heartless and substandard, but the eyes of the masses are discerning and can tell who is reminding them in good faith. After all, stock reviews have professional knowledge. If what they say is true, it is of great reference value to our shareholders. I'll recommend some stock reviews to you, and you'll know after listening:

Today's Securities: Xu Guanhua, Luo Jun and Wu Jinsong.

Shanghai First Finance: Huang Yongdong, Chen Min, Bian Fengwei, Li Yue.

They are all stock reviews that dare to tell the truth, have original opinions and shine. I admire them very much, I believe you will know after listening.

3 Value investment is not the only way out. There are also many experts in short-term investment. The state advocates value investment in the hope that the stock market will stabilize and not skyrocket. Yang Baiwan, a local stock god in China, is more suitable for China's national conditions than Buffett, and has more reference significance. He didn't mean value investment, but band investment. He throws high and sucks low, so he keeps a bag for safety. The world stock market is unusual. Just because America can invest in value doesn't mean we can, just as they are capitalism and we are socialism. This is China's national condition and must be accepted objectively. Everyone has his own method, long line, short line and middle line. As long as he makes money, he is the winner, and he doesn't have to pay attention to any value investment. Isn't Cong Fei's ultra-short-term speculation in warrants also making him a multi-millionaire? The key is to repeat the correct operation and make a profit.

Don't listen to rumors and news, don't recommend stocks, you are right. This market must make a fortune on its own.

As for your question, it is very characteristic of new investors, and it is all superficial and formal. Even if I explain these questions to you thoroughly, you won't benefit from understanding them. In the stock market, the most difficult thing is not the method, but to do it according to the method. Once you trade, you will find that self-discipline is so difficult, the loss is so unacceptable, and the desire for profit is so urgent. .

I used to look for an invincible road like you, and I failed miserably. The real winner will not pursue your question, and there is no standard answer to your question. It's not that I don't know, but I really don't know. All the answers come from the same family. Look at those answers, is there any one in the market that is completely consistent and has risen very well? I'm sure you can't catch it.

I told them that I like to bring a smart person, because I have to review the exam, so I don't have much time. I am stupid and have no confidence in teaching. If you think you are smart, you can give me the information in the station, and I can try my best to help you.