Many veterans in the workplace have suggested that we must shift from technology to management. Is there any realistic reason behind this?

People who are serious about their leaders in the workplace are the most stupid. Management will not touch technical problems, so it will not oppose the company's decision-making, but it is different to engage in technology. For example, let you draw pictures, let you accompany customers, and let you type codes. You may wonder whether the company has really brought benefits to the company by arranging this task. Therefore, engaging in technology is not only troublesome, but also very helpless. Managers only need to send tasks easily.

Why can others type code and you can type code? Even the code you typed has no loopholes, even faster than others, and even you can make your code run in parallel. But why would someone who typed the wrong code go to management? In fact, in a company, no matter how high your technology is, if your position is confirmed, because you have this technology, the company just doesn't need it, even colleagues and leaders don't need it, because this company doesn't need this technology.

Therefore, many people jump to management after fully understanding the technical level, because promotion and salary increase will go to management sooner or later. Just like the workers on the construction site, they all work on yellow helmets and look under white helmets. Have you ever seen management wearing white helmets working with workers wearing yellow helmets?

In fact, the old staff said that not everyone is suitable to transfer to management. If you really like this technology and want to know more, you can stay in the technical layer. Now many companies need management wizards and technical professionals, not managers who muddle along and technicians who run accounts every day.