Why do you want to put fish?

The concept of "release" mentioned in religion is of practical significance. For example, Buddhists often set free, so the real meaning of this "release" is to "let it live", that is, to free dying lives from the bad luck of being killed. In other words, saving these lives will not be painful. For example, all the live animals on the market now are about to be killed, eaten or even eaten alive. Then when they are slaughtered, they also need fear, flesh pain, and even resentment against their killers. Therefore, saving them and letting them escape is the true meaning. Sincere and positive release behavior will cultivate our sympathy and compassion.

Release does not emphasize a form, mainly considering that life after release can continue to survive and survive well. Letting go is not abandoning. Generally speaking, freshwater fish, shrimp, shellfish, etc. can survive in ordinary rivers and lakes, and generally these fish and shrimp belong to soil species, and even if they are put into rivers, they will not mirror the ecological balance. So as to avoid negative images. In other words, "we let them live freely, and they can live freely."

However, these creatures, such as chickens, ducks, cats and dogs, are special and domesticated to a great extent, so it is likely that they will not be able to live a normal life after being released. For example, in general, "cats and dogs" belong to the category of pets and need to rely on people to live to some extent. Then release the cats and dogs, which is similar to calling them "stray cats and dogs". This will have a negative impact, not only their lives will not be guaranteed, but also they may be called diseases. And "chickens and ducks" belong to poultry. As mentioned above, they belong to domesticated species, and their living conditions are very limited after leaving humans. Even some domesticated wild animals are not good after being released. For example, as far as I know, foxes are "released" in some places, and these foxes are farmed artificially and have lost the ability to survive independently, so there is a case of starvation in the mountains. Although the releaser had good intentions, things were not satisfactory, leading to mistakes. ...

The survival requirements of fish are not strict. And will naturally survive after entering the river. Its food and swimming are excellent. You can live freely without human beings, so usually many people who "release" choose fish, that is, aquatic species.

"Release" must take "saving people" as the first priority. From this, his behavior is more positive, which is merit. Otherwise, it's just a formality, "seeking work", so even if it is meritorious, it is very limited. Because "selfishness will damage achievements." In addition, it is wrong to release all species without considering whether they can survive. ...