Why do some people say that Chinese medicine is pseudoscience?

If TCM is a science, it is only a specific knowledge under the guidance of philosophy. With a kind of persistence, you can ascend to heaven and deceive many people, but the eyes of the masses are always discerning. Science should have concrete basis and strong repeatability. The results may be useful or just for fun. Philosophy is largely the genius idea of some people in an era, some of which can be verified, and some may take years to verify. Need facts to prove it. Experience, in short, is some very popular skills or knowledge, which is considered very wise in repetition. Traditional Chinese medicine lacks the link from experience to science, but is directly linked to philosophy. This is hard for people who are used to science to accept. Moreover, from the perspective of the development of Chinese medicine, many Chinese medicine practitioners are also familiar with the history of classics, and directly linking experience with philosophy can also find the historical background. What TCM lacks is pseudoscience, and many aspects of TCM may never exist science.