Are the Book of Changes and the Book of Changes a book? Why is it called differently? Do they all belong to the category of Chinese studies?

The Book of Changes, also known as the Book of Changes or the Book of Changes, is the source of natural philosophy and ethical practice in China's traditional ideology and culture, and the oldest primitive divination in China, which has had a great influence on China culture. It is said that Fu He (Ji Chang) summed it up according to the river map and Luo Shu (which also produced the Eight Diagrams of the Book of Changes). It is the crystallization of China's 5,000-year-old wisdom culture and is known as "the head of the group classics and the source of the avenue". In ancient times, it was the study of emperors and a required skill for politicians, strategists and businessmen. The Book of Changes is essentially a book about divination. "Divination" is to predict the development of future events, and The Book of Changes is a book that summarizes the laws and theories of these predictions.

I ching refers to classic works. Confucianism regards Zhouyi, Shangshu, Shijing, Book of Rites and Chunqiu as five classics. As mentioned earlier, The Classic was later added as a title in recognition of these books. The Five Classics were originally called Yi, History, Skill, Reason, Spring and Autumn. Some people think that the Book of Changes was popular in the Zhou Dynasty, so it is called the Book of Changes. According to Records of Historical Records, some people think that the Book of Changes was written by Zhou Wenwang. However, in several earlier documents, such as The Analects of Confucius, Zhuangzi and Zuo Zhuan, the Book of Changes was only called Zhouyi, and the name of Zhouyi first appeared in Zhou Li. However, scholars are still controversial about the age of Zhou Li. So as far as literature is concerned, "Zhou" should be added later. If we look at the system, the name of Sanyi has no dynasty name, so Zhou in Zhouyi can be interpreted as Zhou Pu and other two divination books, which are relatively corresponding. However, it is still a question whether there were mountains in Xia Dynasty and whether there were Tibetan exiles in Shang Dynasty. The two books are probably the phenomena mentioned in the theory of the accumulation of ancient history. Therefore, it is certain that the book of changes or the book of changes was originally called the book of changes.