Is it credible to tell Gan Long's fortune? _ Is it credible to tell Gan Long's fortune? Zhihu?

Is Gan Long's fortune telling accurate? Is it credible?

Zhi Tianbao, a charlatan, put himself in when he presented Destiny of the Qing Dynasty.

Zhi Tianbao was originally a quack in Gaoyi County. He usually sells some plasters to make a living. I didn't expect the plaster business to be good enough, so I wanted to change my fortune teller. But he didn't tell the fortune of ordinary people, but of the Great Qing Dynasty.

For this big project, he forgot to eat and sleep, and worked day and night as an editor. In the end, he became a wonderful book that he thought would last forever. How should he give it to the emperor first when he finishes writing? He remembered his apprentice Zhang and said to Zhang, "Xiao Zhang, do you want to get rich?" "Yes, of course." "I have a strange book now. I met an old master at the herb gathering and taught me a book of ten thousand years. Let's present it to the emperor together, and prosperity will definitely not run away. " These words made Zhang Gaoxing unable to find the north, so they rushed to Beijing and died.

On the way, they heard that Lord Ganlong was in the tomb, so they hurried to rob the tomb. Knowing that Tianbao was afraid of leg pain, he missed the appointment and gave the book to Zhang. Zhang was in a hurry, and finally arrived here early in the morning on the 20th, kneeling on the imperial road to write a letter.

I didn't expect the book to be presented, but the money was gone. Zhang was caught red-handed when the book was presented. I guess, the perpetual calendar compiled by Zhi Tianbao is not strong enough, and there are many loopholes, or there is something wrong with it, or is there any taboo?

Gan Long handed over the case to Yu Min, a middle official, and Zhang must have confessed Zhi Tianbao. Zhi Tianbao naturally told everything in detail, so what the old master revealed was of course nonsense. That's great. Zhi Tianbao dares to say the time limit of the country and jump to the life span of the emperor. Naturally, it was a big violation and was beheaded.

With the prevalence of literary inquisition in Qing dynasty, it is extremely irrational and even stupid for Zhi Tianbao to dare to criticize the life span of the incumbent emperor and the time limit of the current dynasty. Although Zhi Tianbao wrote with the idea of flattery, no emperor would like someone to say how long your dynasty is and how long your life span is. Even ordinary people, I don't want to hear such a statement, let alone in the Qing Dynasty, where slavery was not allowed.

Therefore, flattery is also about wisdom, and it is not a reward. This could be a disaster.