Is nan huaijin a fortune teller or a fortune teller _ Is nan huaijin a fortune teller or a fortune teller?

Is nan huaijin a fortune teller or a fortune teller?

Fortune telling is also accurate. Actually, Mr. nan huaijin once said that fortune-telling has a history of more than 5,000 years in China, and it can deceive China people for more than 5,000 years. Isn't that to say that people in China are fools? Therefore, if he exists, there is naturally a basis for his existence and a reason for future generations to study him. I'm not saying that I may be a theist. If fortune telling is pseudoscience. It can also be regarded as. But fortune telling is a skill. It does not belong to science. The soul of truth is science. And the soul of fortune telling is not science. But a skill. If we look at it scientifically, we can't figure out what fortune-telling is all about. Fortune-telling does have a theorem. But why is it sometimes accurate? I guess there must be something worth studying. There is a core idea. If we can find it, we can really predict it. So according to the truth, fortune telling is pseudoscience. But according to the core skill of fortune telling. It is not pseudoscience, because it is not science at all. He is a skill. I would rather believe it or not!