"Wolong Feng Chu won one of the two, but the world can be safe." Liu Bei won both, so why not the world?

Feng Chu died young because he suspected Wolong.

According to the later description in The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei would surely win the world if he followed Zhuge Liang's advice completely. But after Guan Yu's death, Liu Bei lost his mind and went his own way to avenge his brother. Then he made a serious strategic mistake: there were many troops and a long front. Moreover, he was headstrong and thought that he had "been familiar with the art of war since childhood". He stopped the army in Yiling, where the vegetation was lush, and even the camp was full of energy. Unexpectedly, it was burned by Lu Xun for 800 miles, which greatly weakened Shu.

If Liu Bei has always been willing to use Zhuge Liang's advice, then it will be no problem to level the world. The reason why it can't be done is Liu Bei.

It is not easy for Zhuge Liang to persist for such a long time.

Refute the view downstairs:

I don't agree with her. How can you say that Jingzhou has lost all the lost opportunities in the world? Zhuge Liang wrote in his model: "Today, the south has been decided and there are enough soldiers. When the three armies are rewarded, the north will set the Central Plains, and the "bluntness" will be exhausted, and traitors and murderers will be exhausted. " Facts have proved that Zhuge Liang's Northern Expedition has the possibility of victory, but it is God's will that makes people fail. Wu surrendered to Wei shortly after Wolong's death, so if Wolong defeated Wei, then he must surrender to Shu. Isn't that "winning" the world?

And there is an important link, I don't know if you have noticed. On one occasion, Zhuge Liang's handsome army approached Xuchang, the capital of Wei, and Wei was unable to resist. Ren Wei was afraid of Zhuge Liang, so he spread rumors that Zhuge Liang was unfaithful. Zhuge Liang was confused and recalled Zhuge Liang, which led to the failure of this campaign. Or if Liu Bei were alive, would he believe this rumor with his knowledge of Wolong? I'm afraid the world was already surnamed Liu at that time.

And why is it wrong to leave Guan Yu alone in Jingzhou? Facts have proved that Guan Yu is very good at guarding Jingzhou, and he killed Cao Jun. Isn't it in the book? According to your meaning, your death is the reason why Shu can't "win" the world. Then we can only understand it as, you mean, only when Wolong and Feng Chu are here can you win the world? After all, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a historical novel. Since it is a novel, it can be exaggerated from a certain angle. I think the exaggeration of the problem we are discussing in the novel is extremely successful, and it is also a highlight of the novel. If you simply evaluate the content of the novel from a historical perspective, I think your understanding of literature is too shallow.

I quite agree with Jiang Xuexuan's point of view. If the world doesn't allow it, how to solve it? Shu might as well move to the desert Gobi and simply be isolated from the world. Is it necessary to use "An"? It's good to die. What's worse, Shu people simply return to the tree as monkeys, and don't have to think about how to fight with others. If I were Wang Wei, I wouldn't be as knowledgeable as a monkey.

I don't quite agree with Wu Zengxi either. Feng is a snob, but by no means narrow-minded. Just because he didn't listen to Zhuge Liang's advice or he started a little behavior, I felt a little arbitrary. He just doesn't have the vision of a warrior, but in terms of strategy, he is absolutely not inferior to Zhuge Liang. You know his role in Battle of Red Cliffs is no less than Zhuge Liang's. From this point, it can be said that he is not narrow-minded. People familiar with the Three Kingdoms must know that without Pang Tong's "advice" to Cao Cao, even if Zhuge Liang borrowed the east wind, what would happen? Such a great contribution, and Pang Tong never wanted to work, willing to be a supporting role, so that Liu Bei may not even know about it later, is it that he is narrow-minded and can't be as famous as Zhuge Liang?

Besides, what happened to Zhuge Liang's belligerence? The same is true of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, who used extreme measure in extraordinary times. There was chaos in the world. If we don't win the world at this moment, will we wait for Wei to sit tight and fight again? During the reign of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, China did not know how many countries there were until it unified the vassal states and defeated the Huns. Wu Hou's strategy of unifying the whole country at this moment can be said to be extremely correct. The difference between him and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty is that the former won and the latter lost. This is why some people who are not objective enough say that he is wrong. !

Zhuge Liang did not go against the sky, but adopted the strategy of adapting to local conditions. Because of this, he showed his reasons, and there is nothing wrong.