Why does the diversity of thinking types not hinder the flexible use of thinking methods?

Different thinking types represent different thinking orientations. In any kind of thinking, it does not hinder the free use of thinking methods, including the flexible use of abstract thinking and image thinking.

There is a play in Beijing Opera called Four Gentlemen, which tells that Young Souljaz's husband was killed by his brother and sister-in-law, and he was sold by his brother. There is a 10% discount for Liu Lin's written statement in the play. Eight patrolmen dressed as fortune tellers learned about Yang's experience in Liulin and wrote a statement for him. Form paper uses both image thinking and abstract thinking. After writing the form paper, Mao read it to Yang Nian again. "... sued Dabo, Diao Sao, brother, etc. Because of' damaging her husband's property and trying to sell whales'. "Mao Peng told Su Zhen to remember the beginning of these eight words (the cause of action highly summarized the nature of the case from the beginning, and it was the most essential part extracted from the case, using abstract thinking. "... Uncle Ting Chun poisoned her husband Mei Ting with wine ... Diao Sao Tian stabbed Bao Tong with a steel knife." Hearing this, he couldn't help crying. Mao Peng said it was a lame excuse that your son was not dead. (Mao Peng wrote this sentence because it is based on the logical reasoning that Uncle Diao Sao dominates production. In line with the plot of the incident, it increased the severity of the case, but it didn't say murder, that's all. )。 Later, Young Souljaz complained to the official with a form paper, and this grievance was finally reported.