I just watched the battle of the red dragon, and the latest episode feels that the plot has become beautiful. what do you think?

I finished reading it. I feel that many places are unreasonable.

First of all, people around the protagonist are scrambling to let the protagonist kill, in order to change the protagonist's big move. For the sake of relatives, friends and the motherland, people do choose individual death to ensure the survival of the group, but is it really equivalent to exchanging one life for another? Since it can be unequal, life also has the instinct to survive. Why don't I want the enemy's life and my own? A lot of things are not explained clearly. Therefore, when many people have to sacrifice, they are not eager for death, but are eager for death. In this process, there is no psychological description, such as feeling fear, sadness, hatred, calculating gains and losses, as if it is their instinct to let the protagonist kill.

Second, the protagonist doesn't behave like a normal person. The closer you get to him, the more sad he will be when he dies. But the protagonist recovered quickly, except to say that I don't want this, and then, like nothing happened, he didn't choose to escape, suicide, revenge, reform or struggle. All the way to the end, it seems that he thinks it is natural that those people's lives are used to trade with the red dragon.

The third is all kinds of inexplicable plots. Huang Lan and the Black Dragon Kingdom tried to kill the Red Dragon, but the Red Dragon didn't die. Who they want to kill is still unknown, and then they say they can't kill, so it doesn't matter if they don't kill. What is the yellow and blue female general in the middle, just to get a lunch? The female general of the Black Dragon Kingdom knew that Zhenhua was coming to rob the League. Why didn't she make more preparations, take more people to ambush, abandon the ship and leave an empty ship? At least, she came to the ship with explosives, but she can't be mutually assured destruction. Well, she's an idiot who believes she's invincible, or she really wants to have lunch. The whole series doesn't explain why good people are good and bad. There is often such a pattern that some people say that someone is a bad person, and then he is a bad person, probably because only episode 12 is omitted too much.

Finally, I vilified China. Am I thinking too much?