As the saying goes, "the old man is a dragon, who is poor?" Is this reasonable?

The old man is a dragon. In the past, people's irresponsibility to the old man was just a typical superstition!

The old man is a dragon;

Man is a dragon, which first appeared in folk proverbs, meaning that the old man is like a dragon, and the dragon gives birth to nine children, and the nine children are different, while pigeons are different. There will be expensive and cheap, and there will be poor and rich, so the old man is usually older than those children who are relieved of money, so the old man will pay more energy and energy, and even more money to take care of those poor and backward children! The elderly are dragons, representing the hardships and efforts of the elderly!

Who is the poor:

In the earliest sense, the elderly care more about their children, that is, they are relatively poor and their families are relatively average. Later, it was extended that wherever the old man went, he would become poorer and poorer! This statement is very irresponsible. Let's assume that the meaning of the first half of his sentence is correct, because if the children are poor and there is no rich condition, it is ok for the elderly to give them a hand. But if the elderly can't walk and take care of themselves, whatever Children's Home they belong to will make them poor. This statement is obviously meaningless, unreasonable and unscientific!

Scientific analysis:

From an objective point of view, the old people have really worked hard for their children, and they deserve our respect. Similarly, if one day the elderly really can't take care of themselves, as children, we must do our best to help the elderly and achieve the best life. At least let the elderly get by materially and spiritually to show filial piety! !