Movies? Jane? Love? film review

As a person who has always advertised that "Jane Eyre is not one of my favorite novels", I have been looking forward to this movie. I was going to wait until the DVD version was released in August, but my fingers itch. So I have to spit out the slag image quality and slag sound effect = =

This version is quite satisfactory among the remakes of many famous works. There is no special silent plot adaptation, and the main plot of the original is complete, so that people can still find the source of the original at least before the book.

Let's begin to enter the part of the text that is anthomaniac and spiteful:

Mr. Rochester in the book is not handsome, of medium height, with broad chest and strict facial features ... but! But! The new version of Jane Eyre invites Uncle Fa to play Mr. Rochester ................................................................................................................................................................ Director, did you shoot Mr Rochester or Mr Darcy?

That sexy look! When Uncle Fa asked "Do you think I am handsom", Mia had to struggle for a long time before saying "No, sir". How can the handsome Mr. Rochester, as always, have the heart to say no ~ Especially in the last scene, where is Mr. Rochester who was burned to death? From a distance, he is obviously a handsome Russian master.

Personally, I think Rochester of the dharma book is not very strict or manic, but always gentle (sunshine tender Rochester = |||). No little girl can stand such a gentle family theory. The scene of the bedroom fire must spit! How can you not splash water on Mr rochester! ! ! ! How can there be no wet uncle!

Miss Mia's Jane has always been very expressionless, okay? Jane is the kind of girl who looks a little lonely, but she is not a facial paralysis girl with no expression. The only part that showed her expression was Jane's painful expression when she learned that Rochester had a wife. How can Jane, who has been expressionless, make Mr. Rochester think that she is a "childish little fellow!" Like a cardinal jumping in front of my heels. "No anger, no anger, no joy, no sadness. There is only one expression on Mia's face, and that is no expression (she has always been like this → = _ =).

This version of Bertha is really beautiful, not as terrible as written in the book, and it doesn't look violent at all. Attacking Mr. Rochester can be completely understood as a woman's jealousy and anger.

Miss Ingram's aura is very small, not like the royal sister in the book at all. Personally, she felt that she was passing by with a soy sauce bottle suit. Selfishly speaking, it should be good for Tang Jiatun's eldest cousin to play this role, especially the cycling clothes described in the book.

Xiao Weisai is playing soy sauce again this time, and Xiao Weisai, who has long hair and handsome hair, is playing soy sauce again. In fact, I don't think there should be too few scenes in Mei Sen, only a few shots. Director, you are so sorry for Harry's heart. The director said that my purpose is to get you to invest in Uncle HC. Beat!

There was no guessing performance, no fortune telling disguised as a gypsy old woman, no "resurrection" of Uncle Reed, no Bessie, no Fending Manor, no lively party, no little pearl necklace, no all the details I wanted it to have, especially a series of playful and lovely conversations when my favorite Jane returned to Mr. Rochester.

The flashback of the film is completely unnecessary, there is nothing to flashback, and flashback does not add color to the film. If it were me, the reverse order would probably be on the eve of the wedding (if Bertha tore the veil like in the book)

According to the original control, in my mind, this film can probably get a passing score.