The fortune telling, naming and naming things that appear on the Internet now are unscientific. Should we trust them?

No matter where you do philosophical research, the ultimate goal is to discover new truths. You can put forward a point of view, and then the more phenomena and facts you explain with this point of view, the closer you are to the truth, and you can't blindly fall into other people's views. Natural science mostly relies on symbols and formulas to express the truth, while philosophy or philosophy of science expresses the truth in the usual language and characters, and our Chinese is most suitable for this. In fact, I think the Chinese characters themselves have a deep philosophical meaning. So if you want to do philosophical research on natural science, you have to have some attainments in natural science itself, which is also very difficult in itself; If you discuss the relationship between science and society, you will find it easier. Society is an extremely complex existence composed of all kinds of people, that is to say, there are too many factors affecting society, and science is just one of them. You can do a comparative study, such as the differences between ancient people without modern technology and modern people brainwashed by modern technology and society. However, no matter where you do research, the most important thing is that your thoughts must not be bound by the existing knowledge and viewpoints of human beings, because there is only one true "truth" and countless "mistakes", and people are making mistakes of different sizes before reaching the final truth.

-

Science is one of human cultures, coexisting with religion, art and philosophy. There was no modern science in the early days, the center of culture was religion, and art was mostly based on religion. Later, philosophy developed, and many great thinkers and philosophers appeared in ancient times. There are no philosophers and artists of the past now. After entering the modern society, the rapid development of science and technology naturally inhibits the development of philosophy (personal views are not necessarily correct), but it is mainly science and technology.

The research category of philosophy of science has two aspects, one is the relationship with society and other human cultures, and the other is the development law of science itself or the philosophical viewpoint based on the law of scientific evolution.

Therefore, I believe that the study of philosophy of science requires a deep understanding of past philosophy, especially the works of ancient Chinese and foreign philosophers and thinkers. I think Mr. Popper's Conjecture and Refutation is very good, and Mr. Popper's Theory of Falsification is very famous. However, some people in China's scientific and technological circles have a wrong understanding of Mr. Popper's falsification theory, and there is no such statement abroad. Falsification means that any scientific theory has certain limitations. If it exceeds a certain range, a new theory must be established, and the original theory will be "falsified"

Few people are really interested in philosophy now. People's thoughts have been materialized by science, and there is no human spirituality. Anyway, I think many people now lack profound thoughts and are easy to make blind judgments. I can't find my true self.