How to understand that when scientists climbed to the top of the mountain, Buddhist masters had been waiting here for a long time?

This seems to have been studied long ago. Einstein never said such a thing! On the basis of what Einstein said, there is nothing to say about this problem! False proposition!

Newton, Einstein and Yang Zhenning are all representatives of the theoretical school of science. It is pseudoscience in essence. They are responsible for using words to develop their imagination, and then wait for practice to prove to him that it is right or wrong. If it is right, it is what I said. If it is wrong, patch it. Such people's imagination is not comparable to those of science fiction writers. Ai En Stein said that man is a highly developed creature, and now he is like a god to human beings. What they did is beyond our present technology. When human science and technology are highly developed, it turns out that we used to be so-called gods, but that's all. Humans are comparable to the so-called gods, but they are actually highly developed creatures!

If we don't consider who said it, but only consider the problem itself, then there are some problems. First, the achievements of modern scientific research, some things look more like what Buddhism said. Second, how many people can explain the contents of Buddhism and then prove it? Third, on the basis of Buddhism, there are many problems that modern science cannot explain clearly for the time being, and some of them are even contradictory! ? Fourth, in fact, how many people can understand the most advanced scientific problems in modern scientific research? ! What I see is that many people who say yes or no actually don't understand Buddhism, science or both, so they come to discuss the problem! This is not something that ordinary people can say clearly! The success of front-end research in Buddhism or modern science is something that ordinary people can't understand!

Of course I don't understand, but many people think they do, just like me. Who can say clearly that you can always quote a Buddhist saying, a scientific experiment? I have seen many people explain science, so don't misunderstand some viewpoints of quantum mechanics, such as double-slit interference experiment. Many people take unknown so as their understanding, and many Buddhist experts explain Buddhism. For example, the color is empty, but many people misunderstand it. However, there are often obvious contradictions between them at least in philosophical speculation, because they don't know what the other party is saying! Whether it is the scientific relevance of Buddhism or the pseudoscience of Buddhism. Can't explain each other's things well, it's all prejudice.

Modern, scientific things, which can at least prove themselves, are unclear to the public. At least when they are finally used, we will know that they are right. For example, the alternating current we have been using, how many people can make it clear! Buddhism will be miserable. There are many things that cannot be confirmed, that is, what Hinayana Buddhism practiced has been modified. There seems to be some scientific evidence, and some truth has been found in the research, but the scientific truth cannot be understood as a whole. Anyone who knows something about Buddhism knows that Buddhism can be divided into secular law and secular law. There are many things in the world law, not to mention scientific proof. How many people in Buddhism can prove themselves now? Besides, out of this world! At most, it is analyzed at the philosophical level, and it also involves many problems beyond modern scientific cognition, which cannot and cannot be confirmed. So, as far as I know, Einstein didn't say it himself. You can search. Someone did an investigation! And then say this, itself is meaningless!

People who believe in Buddhism should not say that about themselves! If it is not said by people who believe in Buddhism, there is a problem! Either stupid or bad! As far as I know, primitive Buddhism does not advocate self-flattery. At that time, Indian thought was also a discriminatory law, and whoever said it made sense listened to it. After China, the Buddha should be predestined friends. After modern times, some masters began to demonstrate from the combination of Buddhism and modern science. We can see what they have done, what conclusions they have drawn, and the discussions between them. There's no need to talk nonsense without knowing anything. Note that I never said that science can confirm Buddhism, nor did I say that Buddhism is ahead of science. These two things are not a system in themselves!

Since ancient times, many people have cursed their ancestors. But read more books before scolding, at least make it clear. Buddhism? And then what? Buddhism? The difference between relationship and scolding is coming again. Since you claim to be? Taoism? Then study hard? Taoist theory? It is a treasure of China culture and the pinnacle of traditional cultural philosophy. Not Taoist temple, fortune telling, practicing qigong; Not an inner Dan and an outer fairy. Don't confuse the folk culture in the Dojo with the philosophy of Taoist culture. The road to Jane is full of magicians.

Science and Buddhism are not in conflict. The wisdom of Buddhism is as reasonable as Zhouyi. Both Buddhism and Yi can be answered if science can't explain them, but evolution can't be simulated by logic or numbers, because if you can evolve, you are God and you are the master. Many smart people can know, but they can never do it. Everyone has limitations, and everything has its own limitations, so that the universe will not be chaotic when it comes again!

Science is always a process in which future generations overthrow the previous generation. Since the atom was discovered, it has been regarded as the origin of the universe. Therefore, science teaching leaders headed by Newton have made various theoretical definitions of the classical physical world. However, with the progress of science and the understanding of the existence of electron nuclei, the temple of Newton's classical physical world collapsed, and Scientology had to establish a new theory, so quantum science came into being, parallel cosmology, superstring theory and so on, but before it was established, more microscopic neutrino God particles were discovered. What did you say?/Sorry?

Empirical science proves that the repeatability of falsification is called empirical science, otherwise it is idealism, the stupidest dogma definition, and self-destruction. It has been two generations behind, but the current textbooks still stay in Newton's classical physics era, forming an unchallenged science teaching. You passed him, the authorities said at once. Are you better than Newton, Einstein and Darwin? This is not a religious god. What is this? Moreover, gravity itself is a hypothesis. The mystery of America, that water flows upward and logs roll upward, has proved that gravity is wrong. Shenyang also has strange slopes.