How to treat Kun's letter of attorney to Li? Is it because he was hacked too much?

I believe that people who eat melons must know one thing recently, that is, Kun sued and forwarded the notification letter from Shanghai Zhengce Law Firm in Kun's studio (April 12), claiming that Kun's reputation and portrait rights were infringed, and demanded that the relevant video content be deleted immediately, otherwise legal responsibility would be investigated.

In the power of attorney issued by Kun and his attorney Weibo, it is claimed that Shanghai Kuanyu Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (the operating company, hereinafter referred to as Shanghai Kuanyu) has infringed Kun's rights of portrait, reputation and performer:

1, Portrait Right, up The owner did use Kun's portrait when creating the corresponding video, but it was not for profit. At the same time, as a public figure, Kun should allow the public to use his portrait for non-profit purposes. Therefore, it is hard to say that the corresponding video infringes on Kun's portrait right.

2. Right of reputation. The corresponding video was uploaded to Miley Miley and watched by the audience. The barrage and comments in this kind of video can prove that this kind of video has reduced Kun's social evaluation and caused him trouble. Therefore, it should be considered that the relevant videos infringe on Kun's reputation.

Weibo, the official official of Bili Bili, gave a link to the website, the content of which was an article titled "On the Reputation Right of' Public Figures' in Public Opinion Supervision from Losing the Case in Fan Zhiyi" by People's Daily. The important position of the referee in the case involved in this paper is that public figures have the obligation to tolerate the published news reports when they supervise the news media by public opinion. As long as the contents of news reports are based on proper channels such as interviews and investigations, and the contents are not obviously untrue, public figures should tolerate slight damage to their reputation caused by news reports. However, Bi Li is not a news website, and Shanghai Kuanyu is not a news media. It is puzzling to quote this article at this time, and it is irrelevant to the People's Daily, which is suspected of impure motives.

What do you think of this matter?