Ai fortune-telling face _ai fortune-telling face

Is artificial intelligence "looking at the face" reliable?

Wan Weigang said: People will have superstitious thinking when facing uncertainty.

Superstition means seeking truth in unreasonable places, meaning in meaningless places, regularity in irregular places and imposing cause and effect where there is no cause and effect.

Recently, a product called artificial intelligence to look at the face was screened in the circle of friends. I happen to be involved in it, and I have three insights. Now I will share them with you.

Note that I'm not talking about this product at present. As far as the current "face-looking" products are concerned, it can only be regarded as a random classroom test at most. Because it only collects a user's avatar, and from the data level, the information of an avatar is obviously too little, isn't it?

So, you might think, what about the future?

In the future, AI may collect more data about people, including genes, medical care, exercise, diet, sleep, interpersonal relationships and social influence. If there are enough AI users, it can predict a person's fate with high probability.

By then, life will become a real game, and you can see your health value, influence, happiness index, social class and other life indexes. When you do a sport, watch a movie, chat with friends and make a public speech, AI will immediately give feedback and adjust your life index.

Perhaps, you don't like or even fear this kind of life, because it will make people uncomfortable. However, it can improve the evolutionary efficiency of the whole human race.

The choice that really makes people better will also be uncomfortable in the process. This is life. For example, many people choose to get up early, even though they know it is more comfortable to hide under the covers.

Therefore, an optimistic attitude towards life is more important than anything else.

The face research institute was launched immediately, and the sharing rate was as high as 50%. Why?

I studied its marketing strategy. It adopts multi-level distribution mechanism, with three kinds of agents: king, diamond and gold, with corresponding tasks, time limit and reward mechanism respectively. First of all, the team specially developed the "agent assistant" applet, which can clearly see accumulative commission's income, today's income and new orders. Simply put, you can understand it as an instant feedback system. Secondly, in order to encourage agents to pass the exam quickly, the agent assistant set up the exam task. For example, the first task of a gold agent is to complete the 50 yuan commission within three days. If the assessment is unqualified, the commission will be settled to WeChat change and the agency qualification will be cancelled. Once the assessment is completed, there will be reward tasks every day, such as adding 3 orders, the commission income will reach 100 yuan, and developing 3 effective agents. Every time you complete a task, there is an extra reward.

It is these reward mechanisms that make thousands of ordinary users become distributors and actively endorse and forward them.

Are these reward methods familiar? Yes, this is the practical application of Munger's emphasis on "excessive reward tendency". As 007, I am ashamed of it. If the reward method is applied to children's education, it will be very powerful.

For the 007 community, we seem to lack such a reward mechanism, or feedback mechanism. Of course, it is a fact that the feedback period of learning is longer than that of marketing. But that doesn't mean we can't learn anything.

The revelation of this incident is that the world is constantly upgrading, and we must keep learning before we can make a choice that suits our own interests.

The marketing of Facebook Research Institute is successful, but its pattern is too small. I need to reflect on this!

The key to seeing the pattern of a thing is to see how much positive impact it can have on the world.

From the point of view of policy makers, Faces research institute has little positive impact on the world. On the contrary, it only satisfies ordinary people's desire for return and satisfies some people's just need for "superstition" (aversion to uncertainty).

Of course, this does not mean that all decisions should pursue the "overall situation." The decisions that really need a "big picture" are the few decisions that will continue to affect life. For example, fill in the college entrance examination volunteers, choose a life partner, determine the career direction, form an entrepreneurial team and so on.

At the same time, everyone's energy is limited, which requires us to spend less energy on unimportant things. For example, Jobs wears the same clothes every time he gives a speech, so there is a consideration of saving energy.

Therefore, for most people, "looking at the face" may not be worth the effort at all. If you really want to test, it doesn't matter if you try, and it's entertainment.

Owen said that the purpose of all human efforts is to obtain happiness.

This is a higher model. In fact, we have done a lot of things for this. If you do something that deviates from this original intention, you are taking a detour.

These are my three insights, which I hope will be useful to you.

Be careful, this is a real advertisement! !

Try if you want, don't hold back and entertain yourself! !