Hello, Mr. Liang Dong! I am confused about the theory of traditional Chinese medicine. Why can't the so-called "meridians", "acupoints" and "qi and blood" be found in anatomy? thank you

I'm not Liang Dong, but I want to discuss these issues with you. Meridians, acupoints and qi and blood are terms of traditional Chinese medicine, while anatomy is the viewpoint of western medicine. The two are completely different and cannot be mixed together. In particular, you can't use western medicine to see Chinese medicine. Some people say that Chinese medicine is unscientific, that is, to look at the results of Chinese medicine in the way of western medicine. If we look at Chinese by western standards, then Chinese characters, not letters, have different pronunciations from English. Is it completely wrong? Meridians and acupoints in traditional Chinese medicine are all found through inspection. Researchers in many countries at home and abroad have tested it with instruments, and it is true that there are meridian phenomena (there are special books), and acupoints are places with low resistance in meridians. This has not been found at the time of autopsy, but it does not mean that it has not been found. Like gravity, now everyone admits it, but who can show it? Is it red? Green? Square and round? So can we say that there is no gravity? In addition, we all know what electricity is, but if a primitive man asks you to take it out and see what electricity is? What should you do? You said the electricity meter was turning, but he didn't understand. He insisted on watching electricity. You said the light was on, and he insisted on seeing what electricity was. This is the same reason. What's your answer? In fact, this is a cultural difference between the East and the West. People who think that acupuncture has been applied to meridians and acupoints are experienced, which is objective. You can't deny it if you don't admit it.