Cai Kangyong Fortune Telling _ Cai Kangyong Fortune Telling Video

1

What is a person's best state? Smile on your lips, self-confidence on your face, dreams hidden in your heart, and actions falling on your legs and feet.

Enjoy the daily sense of ceremony, and meet any little monster in life, so that daily necessities can blossom and bear fruit.

2

Bahrain effect-don't give you trust casually

Bahrain effect comes from a famous saying of Mr. Bahrain, the circus manager, who once said, "Every minute, a fool is born."

Psychologists said: "People think that some horoscope books can accurately point out their own personality. In fact, these words are human nature and can basically be applied to most people, so people will believe them.

If an article in the constellation book is particularly accurate, readers will believe other vague statements more. "So, blindly superstitious horoscope advice will not help people, and may also bring trouble to yourself.

There is a girl who works hard, but she has never been promoted. This may be due to the way she works, but she believes in the truth in the constellation book, such as no plants on the table of Taurus and silver decorations on the table of Leo.

She thinks that her bad luck at work is the cause of the constellation, so she first applied to the leader and asked to change the desk position. Later, she put some silver trinkets on her desk, which puzzled everyone.

The leader felt that she was not paying attention to her work and was dismissed by the personnel department.

In the workplace, there are many "idiots" in Mr. Bahrain's mouth. Although you should listen to other people's opinions more, don't trust other people's comments, listen more and think more. Don't give all your trust to yourself or others

situation

Wang Peng and Zhao Feng joined this unit almost at the same time, so they have a good relationship. However, their personalities are quite different.

Wang Peng is particularly cheerful and has a good relationship with every colleague; Zhao Feng is introverted and seems to frown every day. Wang Peng thinks that Zhao Feng is practical and low-key, and she is a good friend, so she always takes the initiative to tell him her own business.

Because of Wang Peng's work performance and usual performance, the leader is going to promote him. As it happens, the director of their office is going to retire, and the leader talks with him and asks Wang Peng to take this seat.

I didn't expect Zhao Feng to know that she was unbalanced and felt that she also had this ability. Therefore, Zhao Feng sneered at Wang Peng in the office and told many colleagues that Wang Peng was a smooth person who would kiss up to the leaders. This made Wang Peng very sad and embarrassed, but he didn't want to argue with Zhao Feng.

The "letter of appointment" was approved as scheduled, but their unit has such a regulation that it will take some time to solicit opinions from everyone before they can officially take office. Although it is only a formality, since it is a rule, it must be observed.

A week later, the superior leader talked to Wang Peng again, looking very serious. He said that the unit received an anonymous letter, saying that Wang Peng had a problem with his life style, that he had time, place, nose and eyes. Wang Peng almost vomited blood after reading such accusations.

Only Zhao Feng in the company knows that his lover is working in other places, and the signature of the letter is "an enthusiastic colleague". Fortunately, the leaders have a special understanding of Wang Peng, and they are dismissive of this form of anonymous complaints.

In the end, the matter went away, and Wang Peng was promoted as the director of the office. A few days after Wang Peng was promoted, Zhao Feng offered to resign.

Wang Peng didn't keep him or blame him, because he knew he had a great responsibility. If you don't trust yourself first, how can there be a "stab in the back" incident?

Personally, if a colleague slanders the company in front of you, or speaks ill of other colleagues, or … you should neither actively cooperate nor glare.

In this case, your best attitude is not to be credulous. No matter what the other person says, you should first think with your own brain and judge the authenticity of his language so as not to be manipulated by others.

In the process of judgment, the most important thing is to judge the speaker's purpose and the current objective facts.

Even if you find that the other person is cheating you with ulterior motives, there is no need to fight with the other person, let alone glare.

In the workplace, everyone is an actor, and the other party will definitely answer with an innocent expression.

Therefore, as long as you can "do your own thing silently, don't be encouraged easily, and trust your own judgment".

three

Scientists believe that "human beings are the only animals that can accept hints."

? Positive suggestion will have a good influence on people's mood and physiological state.

Stimulate people's inner potential, give play to people's extraordinary level, make people forge ahead and inspire people to forge ahead.

Stay away from negative people! Otherwise, they will steal your dreams unconsciously.

Let you gradually decadent and become mediocre.

? A positive person is like the sun, where it shines;

Negative people are like the moon, and the fifteenth day of the first lunar month is different.

Attitude is everything. What kind of attitude and what kind of future;

Character determines fate. What kind of personality, what kind of life

Some people say that there are three great blessings in life:

I met a good teacher at school.

I met a good teacher at work,

I met a good partner when I got married.

Sometimes they smile sweetly. In the morning, the outsider they said reminds me of the sentence someone said yesterday, saying why Tang Priest became a Buddha? We all know that he is a great leader with a mission. The Monkey King became a Buddha, which we can understand as a highly professional and loyal Tang priest who is protected by exorcism, and can make suggestions by teamwork. Friar Sand became a Buddha, and we can understand that he worked hard for everything, even if there was no credit. But in the end, Pig Bajie also became a Buddha. What we don't understand is that he is lazy and lustful! As soon as the Tang Priest was caught, he became a monkey brother. Let's break up! Such employees have become buddhas! Why? Because he will form a team with the right people, not an outsider.

Warm greetings,

You can make your life different and radiant.

? The most unfortunate thing in life is:

? Because there are no enterprising people around,

? People who lack foresight,

? Make your life mediocre and pale.

four

Why did Tang Priest become a Buddha? We all know that he is a great leader with a mission.

The Monkey King became a Buddha, which we can understand as a highly professional and loyal Tang priest who is protected by exorcism, and can make suggestions by teamwork.

Friar Sand became a Buddha, and we can understand that he worked hard for everything, even if there was no credit. But in the end, Pig Bajie also became a Buddha. What we don't understand is that he is lazy and lustful! As soon as the Tang Priest was caught, he became a monkey brother. Let's break up! Such employees have become buddhas! Why? Because he will form a team with the right people, not an outsider.

five

Analysis of Psychological Problems 20 190324 How to Cultivate Children's Critical Thinking?

Speaking of critical thinking, I remember listening to a lecture once. A primary school teacher shared her teaching experience and said: Critical thinking is very important, so I think critically. No matter which expert or professor comes to give a lecture, I can criticize and refute what he says. Therefore, we should also teach children critical thinking.

As soon as I listened to the music, I joked with this beautiful teacher that I knew nothing about education! But from a psychological point of view, you are not critical thinking, you are playing a critical video game.

Maybe many people, like this teacher, have two misunderstandings about critical thinking.

First, think that critical thinking is criticizing others.

Second, I think teachers can "teach" children critical thinking.

Let's talk about the first misunderstanding first.

In fact, critical thinking is a set of cognitive abilities, such as reasoning, judgment and decision-making, problem solving and other thinking processes.

More specifically, critical thinking includes many skills such as prediction, conjecture, logical reasoning, hypothesis testing, causality judgment, opinion formation, reflection and so on.

Therefore, don't think that refuting other people's views is critical thinking, which is our thinking about thinking and a more comprehensive cognitive process.

Critical thinking is not a strict scientific concept, but a set of cognitive abilities.

Let's look at the second misunderstanding.

We can't teach children critical thinking. This beautiful teacher may think that critical thinking is the same as learning to use chopsticks. Once we learn how to use it, we will master it forever. Decades of cognitive psychology research shows that critical thinking is not a set of skills that you can apply to any situation after learning.

That's easy to say. Children aged three or four who have not been trained in thinking have some critical thinking abilities, such as causal reasoning and conditional probability judgment.

There is a simple math problem, please think about it, and then write down your answer at the first time.

① The total price of ball and racket is $ 1. 1, and racket is more expensive than ball $ 1. What's the price of this ball?

Many people's first reaction is $0.65438 +0. 1+0. 1, the racket is more expensive than the ball 1 USD. Is the racket $65,438 +0. 1, and the total price is $65,438 +0.2?

The correct answer is that the price of the ball is 0.05 dollars. This seemingly simple question was used by Nobel Prize winner and psychologist Daniel Kahneman to test the rational thinking of students from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University and Harvard University. It turns out that most of the top students answered this question wrong.

Humans are naturally lazy, and we like intuitive judgment. Generally, only the superficial meaning of the problem is considered. The advantage of doing this is that it can help us understand things faster. The disadvantage is that it is difficult for us to understand the deep structure of things, which is exactly what critical thinking needs.

Some people don't know the price of rackets and balls. They rely more on intuition than the linear equation behind the racket.

Similarly, if you just repeatedly tell your child to "look at the problem from multiple angles", he really learns this sentence and knows that he should do it, but if he encounters unfamiliar fields or problems that he doesn't know well, he still can't think from multiple angles.

This is because, if you are familiar with a field, you will naturally think from multiple angles, consider the validity of the evidence, and consider the latest evidence that even runs counter to your original point of view.

But if you are unfamiliar with this field, even if you know that you need to consider it comprehensively, you don't know where to start.

Psychologists invited American college students and China college students to test their critical thinking ability.

The research group asked the college students such a question. A man went to the mountain to look for treasure. He has no map, only a flashlight and a bag. What should he do to ensure that he won't get lost?

The solution to this problem is to take a handful of sand with you (mark the tree) and leave traces along the road to track the path.

It was found that about 75% of American college students answered correctly. But only 25% of China students got it right.

American college students can answer the correct questions because they have heard many similar fairy tales since childhood, and they also talk about how to leave traces when traveling, while our students in China seldom listen to similar stories.

When the researcher changed the story into a folk story familiar to China people, the result of this experiment was reversed, and most people in China could solve the problem.

You see, critical thinking skills skillfully used in one field may not be translated into another field quickly.

For example, a child's reasoning ability is good, which does not mean that his judgment and decision-making ability are also good, nor does it mean that he can do all the reasoning problems correctly, and he can't do well when he encounters problems in unfamiliar fields.

0 1. Accumulate certain domain knowledge and practice.

Just because a person can think critically does not mean that he can always do it, because background knowledge and practical experience will affect his critical thinking ability.

(3) If you teach children, there were five apples, one was eaten by dad, and there were four left, 5- 1=4.

Then you ask the children again, the citizens organized a float parade, originally decided to go around the city five times, and later decided to turn less 1 circle, and finally turned several times.

Children may be confused and have to think for a while.

Because in children's minds, the first problem is eating apples, which children are very familiar with, and the second problem is the float parade, which children have never participated in.

Therefore, I think it is necessary to consciously help children accumulate knowledge in some fields as soon as possible and model every new problem they encounter.

Why do I repeatedly say in the group that I hope the father of the child will take the child out to play and go out to see more, just to build a strong background knowledge base for the child.

One more thing, many children have actually learned a lot of knowledge in many fields, and their biggest problem is the lack of practical opportunities.

Give children enough time and opportunities to practice new concepts until they finally master the methods to solve problems, so that children can deeply understand the problems and automatically call critical thinking in similar situations.

02. Teach children to use critical thinking in daily life.

When my daughter was young, I took her to the zoo. She saw whales and dolphins in the aquarium. I told her that they are actually mammals, similar to dogs and cats. My daughter was very surprised because she thought whales and dolphins should be fish.

We know that children have an intuitive classification of fish and mammals, and think that fish should swim in the water.

After returning home, I explained the principle of animal classification to her, and she understood the causal correspondence applied by biologists in classification.

We can also look at two things in a comparative way anytime and anywhere.

For example, I took my daughter to the supermarket, looked at carrots and pumpkins, and asked my children what the similarities and differences were.

Color, shape, taste and size can be compared from all angles.

My daughter has an answer that is particularly interesting. I will share it with my classmates. She said: Pumpkins can be carved into pumpkin lanterns, but carrots can't. I showed her carefully, and I said, yes, but do you know why?

Let me give you a hint. Which is more difficult to dig, pumpkin or carrot? Which one has pulp in it?

For example, what she wants to buy, or what she wants me to take her to play, she needs to give reasons and convince me with one, two or three pieces of evidence and logic.

In the process, if her inference is wrong, I will point it out.

Slowly, when she speaks, she will start to be well-founded, slow and steady, and will set me up.

For example, after reading gruffalo, you can ask your child: What do you think would happen if the mouse didn't scare gruffalo away? Why?

This logical discussion encourages children to discuss and gives multiple reasons.

Children can also be encouraged to come to a conclusion: Are rats brave? Why do you think so? Ask your child's opinion: Do you like this story? Why?

03. Observe, assume, test, reflect and adjust.

One winter, there was not much snow in Anshan, and we finally met a snow. We hurried out to play, stepping on footprints and throwing snowballs in the snow.

After playing for a while, my daughter found that snowflakes would "disappear" in her hands and become water. She was particularly curious and asked me what was going on.

I said, guess what?

She said: Maybe the hand was too tight and crushed the snowflake?

I put a small snowflake on my palm and showed it to her. She found that snow would still turn into water.

I told her that maybe snowflakes are afraid of heat. When our hands are hot, snowflakes turn into water.

She seemed incredulous and said, How can you prove it? Haha, I quite like the idea. )

I said, the temperature at home is higher than outside. Snowflakes are afraid of heat and will turn into water when they go home. Let's have a try.

I brought a mass of snow home and put it in a bowl. After a while, she looked at it and shouted: snow becomes transparent ... transparent snow becomes water ... everything becomes water.

Then she began to think: how did snow turn into water so slowly? Does the snowflake melt when it falls into my hand? (Ha, ha, ha, why is there so many questions for a child?)

I inspired her: you only have a small snowflake in your hand, but we have a big mass of snow in our hand. Also, snow is afraid of heat, which is generally hot and particularly hot. Is it different?

She dressed immediately and ran out, digging a lot of snow back. Put a little on the radiator and a little on the balcony. I'm busy.

You see, in this process, she first observed that the snow would melt, and then we put forward a hypothesis to test whether this hypothesis is true.

She reflected again and observed that the snow melting speed was slow, then assumed the reason and adjusted the condition test. A simple scientific experiment is such a process. Have you learned?

abstract

Critical thinking depends on people's experience in different fields, including knowledge and practice. We need to teach children critical thinking in specific situations and contents.

My usual way of thinking is observation, hypothesis, test, reflection and adjustment. I also use this way of thinking to teach children to do simple experiments and think scientifically by themselves.

six

Barnum effect. The word "barnum" comes from a famous juggler. The so-called juggler is that he sometimes plays some tricks to make people at the scene feel that he has great power. When barnum performed, he used ambiguous words. This trick, as long as you have calculated your life, you may have really experienced it. Fortune-tellers like to say nothing more than "Well, you look mature, but your heart is simple, like a child" or "Oh, you are too kind to be bullied by others".

This matter has been tested by psychologists. Nearly 70 years ago, psychologist bertram R Foley gave a test to the students in his class. Foer told the students, "If you think this test is accurate, the full score is five." Results After completing this test, the students got their own personality analysis, which they all thought was too accurate. The average score given by the whole class is as high as 4.26, which is close to five out of ten. When everyone thought that "his personality was described accurately", Forer, the tester, told everyone, "Do you know? Each of you gets exactly the same personality analysis. "

-Cai Kangyong EQ class

seven