Teacher evaluation and promotion plan

First, in order to fully implement the national education policy, comprehensively, fairly and objectively evaluate the work of teachers, mobilize the enthusiasm of teachers, and promote the development of education in our township, this assessment plan is formulated in accordance with the relevant laws, regulations and the spirit of the document.

Second, the assessment object: teachers who meet the assessment conditions in towns and villages.

Three. Assessment organization: members of the central school administration and teachers' congress.

Four, the assessment content and the proportion of each score.

1, daily work in school

(1), attendance 10 (full attendance, absenteeism 1 day, deducted 3 points, absenteeism 0.5 points, personal leave 1 day, deducted 0. 1 point, and deducted 0./kloc-for being late or leaving early. )

(2) Earnestly complete all tasks on time (six earnest, various lists) to meet the inspection standards, 20 points, 2 points for one-time unfinished tasks, 1 point for unfinished software materials such as lists, and 3 points for unfinished inspections in school districts and above.

(3) Take an active part in or organize various activities, get 5 points, and deduct 1 point for not participating once.

(4) 5 points for safety work (no full score for safety accidents, no score for those responsible for safety accidents).

(5), teacher's morality 10 (full marks for not being informed criticism by departments at all levels, not violating teachers' professional ethics and other relevant regulations, or no score).

2. Job performance

(1), the burden is 0. 1 for each student, 2 points for subjects (Chinese and mathematics), and 0/point for class teacher (the number of students is calculated according to the number of statements at the beginning of the school year, and the personal burden of teachers is calculated as: the number of students in one class divided by 2, the total number of students in two classes divided by 3). Add 10, 9 and 8 points to the total score respectively, and add 5 points to the middle ranking, and the reciprocal of 1 and 2 will not be added (according to the management of the graduating class in the school district).

(2) The teacher's performance evaluation is 60 points. The evaluation is based on the single ranking of the county-wide unified examination results at the end of the reference school year, and its calculation formula is:

(The total number of classes in the same subject at the same level in the county-the teacher's personal ranking+1) The total number of classes in the same subject at the same level in the county is× 60, and the number of junior high schools is compared with that in the same level in the county.

3. Additional points

(1) 1 point awarded by various departments at all levels (only once a school year) (subject to the certificate) is recorded as recognition in the evaluation and promotion.

(2) extra points for being responsible for the work of various departments of the school: (only once)

6 points for the director of education, 5 points for the person in charge of the village, 4 points for the leader of the teaching and research group, the accountant and the young pioneers counselor, 3 points for the management of student status, 2 points for the personnel of other departments, and the cumulative assessment of multi-functional departments.

(3) When all kinds of papers (papers with education numbers) were published in that year (5 points at the national level, 3 points at the provincial level, 2 points at the state level and 1 point at the county level), only one assessment year was added at most.

(4) Winning prizes in various activities carried out by superiors or schools shall be subject to certificates (4 points at or above the county level, 2 points at the district level, and only once in an assessment year).

(5) If the teaching achievement is among the top 10 in the same grade and subject in the county, give 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 point respectively; Those who rank in the top three in the same grade and subject in the whole region will be given 3 points, 2 points and 1 point respectively according to the first, second and third places. Reward points should be accumulated.

(6) 0.5 points for each full year of teaching experience.

Supplementary explanation of verb (abbreviation of verb)

1, the test scores shall be subject to the state or county unified examination.

2. This assessment method shall be implemented as of the date of discussion and adoption.

3, the annual assessment, job evaluation, evaluation from the highest score to get enough places.

Intransitive verbs This assessment is used in the following aspects.

1, annual evaluation of teachers.

2. Job evaluation and evaluation.

Huidong county center Xiang center school

Teacher evaluation and promotion plan [2]

According to the spirit of the superior documents, in order to commend the advanced and backward, and promote teachers' dedication, the school comprehensively evaluates each teacher's morality, ability, diligence and performance based on the principles of objectivity, fairness and openness, and strives to satisfy each teacher. The school has formulated the following evaluation scheme for teachers' evaluation and promotion.

First, set up a leading group for school evaluation, with Liu Yuehua as the leader and Wang Yaoliutang as the member.

Second, the finalist condition is 1, and the final four rate is at least the first, second and third teachers in the town. 2. Teachers with high attendance and qualified professional ethics.

Iii. Composition of evaluation and assessment —— The comprehensive score of hard conditions is 1, and the length of service is 2 points per year from the current job to the time of competition. 2, the length of service is divided into 10 years or more of teaching experience, 1 year or more plus 1 minute. 3. In the annual assessment, after April 30th, 2065438+2007, 5 points were excellent and 4 points were competent. 4. Bachelor degree 5 points, college degree 4 points. 2. The comprehensive score of business ability is 1, and the paper category score is A. The winning papers published from the current position to the time of election are divided into 4 points, 3 points, 1 and 1 according to the school level of the country, province, city, district and town. B, all grades need to provide real and valid documents to score. If the same project wins multiple awards, the highest number of awards for each paper will be calculated at the highest level. 2 teaching, lectures, experience exchange and other teaching, scientific research and teaching achievements. B. All scores must provide true and valid proof to score the same project and win multiple awards. The highest level is used to calculate the maximum scores of teaching, scientific research and teaching in each period.

Once. 3, teachers, students, class honors and other awards with the same score.

If a project wins multiple awards, the highest grade will be calculated, and the score will be calculated at most once per period. 4. Scoring of scientific research topics. Authorized by the party, government and education authorities.

Teachers' morality is 30 points until election time. Every time the school verifies the report, 5 points will be deducted. Every time the report is verified by the superior, 10-30 points will be deducted as appropriate.

By the election time, the attendance rate is 20 points. Every academic year, if you leave Man Qin, you will get 20 points; if you leave for more than three days, you will get 15 points; if you miss work for more than one month, you will get 5 points; if you miss work, you will get 0 points. Absence a week ago, deducted 2 points.

5. Democratic evaluation: 20 votes/total number of teachers ×20= score. This kind of evaluation is carried out under the condition that teachers score the same.

Six leading group evaluation 10 votes/total number of teachers × 10= score.

This competition was conducted under the condition that teachers scored the same and democratic evaluation scored the same.

20 12 September 7th

Teacher evaluation and promotion plan [3]

In order to commend outstanding, encourage advanced and arouse students' learning enthusiasm; In order to improve the quality of distance training of "National Training Plan", the evaluation scheme for outstanding students is specially formulated.

I. Evaluation work flow and principles

(a) evaluation process

Selection of class tutors-publicity of preliminary examination of the national continuing education network for primary and secondary school teachers-audit of provincial project offices-issuance of certificates of outstanding students.

(2) Evaluation principles

1. Adhere to the principle of fair, just and open selection, implement multi-level, multi-channel and all-round assessment, adhere to the combination of process assessment and final performance assessment, and strive to evaluate scientifically and accurately.

2 to ensure the authenticity of the evaluation project, timely publicity evaluation results, accept public verification and reporting.

Second, the selection method of outstanding students

(A) the basic conditions for selecting outstanding students

1, actively participate in online courses, and pass the comprehensive evaluation of various indicators. In principle, the total score is not less than 95 points.

2. Articles (including comments) such as submitting homework and actively publishing training logs have been recognized by students, tutors and experts in this class;

3. The homework has many references and recommendations (including comments);

4. Actively participate in forum exchanges and discussions;

5. Serve warmly throughout the training process and take the initiative to help others; This is widely recognized by the students in this class.

(2) Selection method

In order to improve students' learning enthusiasm, ensure that all classes can select outstanding students and set an example for all students in the class, the selection of outstanding students is based on the class. The selection ratio shall not exceed 30% of the class size.

2. The selection should mainly refer to the students' platform achievements. If the students' comprehensive scores are the same when they are selected, they can be compared with the following principles:

1) Students with the same comprehensive scores can be evaluated according to their excellent homework and the number of summaries; Excellent students with a large number of excellent students are preferred.

2) Students with the same number of the above two items can choose according to the sum of the topics (posts, replies, comments, etc.). ) submitted by students;

3) If outstanding students cannot be selected according to the above methods, they can be selected according to the total duration of course study.

4) If students make special contributions to the class during their study, they can also be considered.

The selection of outstanding students needs to be determined by combining academic performance. On the basis of reaching the evaluation standard of the national training plan, it is recommended by the class at a ratio of no more than 30%. Instructors of each class should report the list to the continuing education network for preliminary examination and publicity. Continuing Education Network will report the final list of outstanding students to Hubei Project Office for approval, and issue certificates of outstanding students.

The date for tutors of each class to submit the list of outstanding students is May 1 to May 20th. Please send the list to email #url#. The submission format must conform to the following table, and every piece of information is indispensable, otherwise it will be deemed invalid. (Sample forms can be shared and downloaded in the tutor group)

Remarks: If the tutor fails to send the list of outstanding students within the required time, we will conduct training according to the order of students' grades in this class, and select the top 30% as outstanding students.