What does this sentence mean,' benevolence and righteousness don't command soldiers, and benevolence and righteousness don't care about money'?

1, kindness doesn't take charge of soldiers, and benevolence doesn't care about money. The consciousness is: kind people are not suitable for taking charge of military power, and money can turn brothers against each other, so honest people don't take charge of property.

1, righteousness does not command soldiers, and righteousness does not keep money? bù zhǎng bīng，yì？ make extensive use of the expertise from all quarters

2, loyalty does not keep money, there are many loyal friends in the world, but friends must value friends over money. The so-called loyalty and wealth, so the righteous can not keep money, can not keep money because they do not care about money.

People who are kind and don't command soldiers, people who are kind and kind have no dignity, but those who command soldiers will be more powerful than those who are kind, and those who can combine kindness with kindness are the best people.

3. Original intention: Kindness does not command soldiers, kindness and benevolence. If they are kind, they have no dignity. However, if the soldiers don't give orders, there will be chaos without power. Therefore, people who command the army will be stronger than kindness. If they can combine kindness with kindness, then they are the best people. Righteousness does not keep money. Loyal people in the world have many friends. However, friends must attach importance to friends and ignore money. The so-called generosity and saving money, so honest people can't keep money, but also because they don't care about money.

The implication is that ancient literati satirized rich and powerful people! !

5. As the saying goes, "those who have power have no benevolence, and those who have money have no righteousness."