Ma Zhe, is this true? Does fate exist? We study philosophy, what does the west learn?

First of all, I appreciate that you will ask such a question, which proves that you are thinking. Good! !

Let's begin to answer one by one:

First, things like the face of the Prime Minister, if you believe it, will work. How does science explain your palmprint? It's just a ditch in your hand. Now you look at all kinds of handprints and make fists: fate is in your own hands!

Second, the theory of metaphysics is not completely wrong. Feng Shui is an example. Some modern feng shui is also applicable. Besides, no matter whether a theory is fallacious or not, it can be established. Look at cults. Their theories are contrary to all mankind, unlike tall buildings.

Third, modern science really can't prove everything about China's metaphysics, which is inevitable, just as we don't know how the ancients wrote the Book of Changes and invented gossip. It can be explained by some modern values. I suggest you don't rush to explore China's philosophy. Too extensive and profound, or you may lose yourself.

Fourth, why has it a long history? Any world outlook, as long as it is accepted and pursued by others, will naturally spread. Let me give you an example. At that time, there were many Stoic scholars in ancient Rome, but now there are fewer. Isn't that why? China's philosophy, as a part of China culture, existed when this group of people became a nation, and will continue to exist with this nation. The deep-rooted reason is related to its existence time and development process, and also related to the long-term leadership of Chinese civilization in the world. This is a historical issue. If you are interested, talk to your friends.

Fifth, Marxist philosophy is indeed scientific and correct in the eyes of socialist countries. If you know more about modern western philosophy, you will find it relatively reliable. It explains many things relatively scientifically and completely. However, in my opinion, any kind of philosophy is for the present people. As long as it works, it is natural, reliable and scientific. I think Ma Zhe is still not scientific enough in some aspects, even very powerful (reactionary remarks! )。 Looking around the world, I have more views on philosophy. In capitalist countries, some people, especially liberal capitalists, think that socialism and philosophy are historical demons, because they think that private property is sacred and inviolable. This is still a historical issue. If you are interested, we'll talk later. Some people think that philosophy is reliable, such as Sartre, who is an existentialist, but he thinks that the only scientific philosophy is philosophy! Therefore, it has always been that different people have different opinions, and there is no completely unified view. Even for the survival of all mankind, there are fascists who want to destroy you! Don't be too persistent, the world is a beautiful place!

6. Capitalism doesn't mean not learning from philosophy. They choose to study. For example, some people think that Marx borrowed and developed Ricardo's surplus value theory, which is very scientific. They study this. Of course, there are those who don't study. Philosophers are not politicians. They like to learn from others and form their own schools. They learn more philosophy, such as existentialism, voluntarism, positivism, neo-Kantism, intuitionism, analytical philosophy, phenomenology, hermeneutics, pragmatism, structuralism, deconstruction and so on. Not all people are completely opposed to philosophy of philosophy. There may be some similarities between the two philosophies, but there may also be some contradictions.

Seven, the answer is coming to an end. It seems that you are interested in these things. Welcome questions!