Debate on fortune telling _ a fortune telling debate

Pro: Chairman Mao taught us that "man can conquer nature". The external environment can affect a person's success, but the internal factors are the key and decisive force. ) Man's destiny is in his own hands. Hawking, Beethoven, Helen Keller, Gorky, ostrovsky ... These people proved the proposition that fate is in their own hands with their lives!

Pro: "Everyone is the creator of his own destiny." Of course, one's fate is in one's own hands.

Founder: I want to ask another debater: If people's fate is determined by society, then why should we struggle? Opportunities do exist. I once read a report that a cleaner had to go to night school after a hard day's work. As a result, he was admitted to a civil servant, and his fate changed from 65438 to 080 degrees. Excuse me, opponent, if this gentleman doesn't make progress through his own efforts, will his fate change?

Professor: Everyone comes into this world with a so-called fate problem. Superstitious fortune tellers believe that "people's lives are predestined, and it's useless to think about it." From a scientific point of view, fate is not predestined at all and cannot be changed. Take control of your own destiny, rely on yourself and work hard on your own.

Professor: Yes! Society provides the rules of the game for individuals, and individuals are bound by society, but everyone's success is never determined by the rules! You said that if Mr Lincoln was born in China, he could not be president, but he could be president of the United States. Then why did tens of millions of people living in the United States finally produce President Lincoln? Why didn't General Grant become one? Why don't other Americans do this? Please answer!

In favor: the logic of the opposing debater is contradictory! Is "restriction and containment" equal to "mastery"?