Full palace system or separate palace system? Modern astrology or classical astrology?

The whole palace system and the divided palace system, modern astrology and classical astrology often cause beginners' questions. Which one should we refer to? The house on the planet has been changed in different systems, and I don't know which one to watch.

In fact, at first, I didn't think it was necessary to care too much. Just choose a focus.

0 1

Full palace system or separate palace system?

At present, the astrolabe APP will provide a variety of palace systems. The most common palace systems in modern astrology are placide and Koch. Classical astrology often uses Alcabitius, and the whole palace system is often mentioned.

At this time, many people will be confused. Once the house system changes, the planets in the astrolabe of the core monuments of life may be completely different from the main stars in the house, and the house position is the most important part to be considered when interpreting the astrolabe, especially when the planets change from 12 to 1, the sixth house to the seventh house, and from the unstable fruit house (3, 6, 9, 12).

I will not repeat the background and theoretical methods of these palace systems here, but only provide a reference option in practice.

Let's talk about the whole palace system and the separate palace system first. Under the separate palace system, 1 palace generally spans two constellations, which is more intuitive under the full palace system. 1 constellation is equal to 1 palace, rising constellation is 1 palace, and so on.

My suggestion is that novices don't have to consider the whole palace system, because they can't push it accurately, and they have to return to the separate palace system later.

On the Internet, it is reasonable to say that the separate palace system explains the internal motivation and self-feeling, while the whole palace system shows the result of the combination of the motivation of the separate palace system and the external reality, so the separate palace system looks at psychology and the whole palace system looks at the pattern energy in reality.

And I feel that in practice, we can actually see the contents of the above-mentioned whole palace system by using the palace division system. Although some astrolabes use the full palace system, it really feels more obvious than the full palace system, but because I haven't verified it with a large number of samples, I can't strictly say yes or no, I can only say that you don't have to spend too much energy on the full palace system at first.

The only reference situation is that when you find a robbery in the astrolabe (the two houses have the same head constellation, or 1 house contains more than two constellations), while giving priority to the explanation of the palace main star under the single house system, you can also go to the whole house system to confirm the change of the palace main star, and the palace main star can also refer to describe the state of this house at this time. Note that this is only for reference. Under the theoretical system of the palace division system, the interpretation of the palace main stars under the palace division system is naturally the main one.

For example, under the separate house system, the main star of 1 and 2 houses is Aries, and at this time 1 house is robbed, and the main star of 2 houses is Mars. When changing to the full palace system, the second head of the house is Taurus, the second constellation from Aries, and the main star of the house is Venus. Then the state of the second house mainly depends on Mars, and the auxiliary reference is Venus.

Of course, if you don't consider the main star of the palace under the whole house system when grabbing, I don't think it's a big problem, because the astrolabe is the superposition of various energies to judge a result, and this difference alone is not enough to affect the conclusion.

02

Which one does the palace use? Present or ancient occupation?

Placidus is the most common astrological APP in modern times, and Alcabitius is often used in classical astrology. I think both of them can be explained based on their own theoretical systems, which is completely sufficient compared with the beginner stage.

As for other palace sub-systems, you can study them in depth if you have spare capacity. It's not that the two systems are wrong, but the methods are different.

Here, I would also like to add the difference between classical astrology and modern astrology. The biggest difference is three points. (I don't discuss the difference between the two theoretical systems here, just look at the difference between the astrolabes. )

As you can see, these are actually two different tools. Although it looks similar on the surface, the actual theory is not universal.

Because modern astrology is easy to get started, and the online theory is mainly based on modern astrology, so the common misunderstanding is to use modern astrology theory to explain the astrolabe of classical astrology, or vice versa. Neither of them can do it, but it is easy to make yourself more confused.

Especially for physiognomy, some people will find that there are many physiognomies in ancient occupations and their tolerance is particularly great, but there are fewer occupations now. That's because the calculation principle itself is different. Don't enlarge the picture at will in order to find more clues, and don't think that more ancient pictures can explain more different contents.

The two systems observe fate from different angles, and the object of observation will not change because of the different observation tools.

As for choosing an ancient occupation or a present occupation, considering the time and money cost of study, I think it is still possible at the entry stage. There are some similarities between the two, so don't be too distracted by these differences. Just focus on one first.

No one really mastered the art of life, everyone just stumbled in the dark. -Richard mcguire, Here.