Can a judge concurrently serve as a university teacher?

Can an old judge be a part-time teacher of judge training?

According to the relevant laws of our country, high-quality judges with rich trial experience are encouraged to serve as part-time teachers for judge training.

Judge training institutions at all levels arrange part-time teachers engaged in training, which are included in the business assessment scope of their departments. In other words, experienced old judges can also serve as part-time teachers for judge training.

Regulations on training of judges

Article 19

Teachers who train judges should combine full-time and part-time, mainly part-time.

Article 20

A training institution for judges shall establish a team of full-time teachers and managers suitable for the training tasks.

Full-time teachers engaged in judge training should generally have graduate education or above, high political and professional quality, and have corresponding judge qualifications and trial work experience. Full-time teachers for judge training should generally be selected from among judges.

Full-time teachers of judge training institutions should participate in the trial work in a planned way and enrich their practical experience in order to enhance the pertinence of training and teaching.

Article 21

Encourage high-quality judges with rich trial experience to serve as part-time teachers for judge training. Judge training institutions at all levels arrange part-time teachers engaged in training, which are included in the business assessment scope of their departments.

How does the judge evaluate?

Judging from the current situation, without strengthening management means, including performance appraisal, it will be difficult for the court to operate effectively and the judicial credibility will not be improved. Need to weigh the pros and cons. However, we should pay attention to improving the assessment methods to realize the "relative rationality" of performance appraisal.

From the perspective of reform practice, one of the main ways to strengthen management supervision under the simple administration and decentralization is to strengthen the performance appraisal of judges. The typical method is to "determine the number of staff by case" (the number of judges and judicial assistants), to "determine the responsibility by case" (the number and quality responsibility of handling cases) and to "determine the remuneration by case" (determine subsidies, rewards and punishments according to the case handling situation). In operation, this assessment method directly links the completion of trial responsibility with subsidies and rewards and punishments, and then realizes performance evaluation by scoring or even directly recording the amount of rewards and punishments. A few yuan will be subsidized for running a case, a few yuan will be deducted for trial defects, and so on. This method pays attention to the fine and digital management of evaluation, avoids fuzzy management, and its incentive and spur functions are generally obvious. However, this practice has also caused some controversy, and there are also some noteworthy problems in the operation.

These are Bian Xiao's answers to relevant legal questions. According to the relevant laws of our country, high-quality judges with rich trial experience are encouraged to serve as part-time teachers for judge training.

Judge training institutions at all levels arrange part-time teachers engaged in training, which are included in the business assessment scope of their departments. In other words, experienced old judges can also serve as part-time teachers for judge training. If you need legal help, you are welcome to seek legal advice.