I'm going to take part in a debate contest. In my opinion, success depends on strength, not opportunity. Please provide me with detailed information.

The other side's point of view is that success depends on opportunity, not strength?

It's simple,

First of all, success requires certain opportunities (the other party may cite Jiang Taigong and Zhuge Liang as examples), but people with strength can win opportunities by virtue of their own strength. For example, in an election, voters never know you. If you are not elected, you will have a chance to be elected.

Secondly, if you have no strength, even if the best opportunity in the world is right in front of you, you will not succeed. Like Liu Adou, fortune telling, good chance? After he became the "emperor", it is reasonable to say that he can be the emperor, right? But he can't do it himself. He can't hold on. ...

Thirdly, opponents may put forward the view that "football is round", but the reason why "weak teams" can beat "strong teams" is also related to their strength. Weak teams can win by unity and cooperation as a whole. If they are better than their opponents at a certain point, they can be defeated.

Please add others.