Modern carpenters restored the ancient torture device "wooden donkey", which caused a heated discussion. Why does restoring history involve disrespect for women?

The carpenter in this incident was made by hand. Among the contents he posted on the short video platform, there is an improved version of the ancient torture device "wooden donkey" for unclean women. Although netizens have always ridiculed him as a "minister of punishments", it is really unacceptable for him to make "instruments of torture". The reason for this is the following：

First, netizens mocked him as "the minister of punishments", which was just a joke, instead of letting him pretend to be "the minister of punishments". In his previous works, handmade Geng was ridiculed as "the history of punishment", but this ridicule was just a funny expression when netizens were watching it, but he took this ridicule seriously, claiming to be the history of punishment, and made real ancient instruments of torture, of course, with a hammer.

Second, although the "wooden donkey" as an instrument of torture deserved it for some women in that society, it offended some "free" women in modern times. In ancient times, "wooden donkey" was a cruel torture to women. Generally speaking, this kind of torture device will not be used until it reaches the level of a slut. Although these tortured women deserved it in the eyes of that year, it is possible to catch a hundred and take three or five in the street in terms of the openness of women now. This probability is certainly not the same as that of hundreds of years ago.

Therefore, these "free" women just violate morality and are not illegal. Of course, they have something to say. This kind of torture device is still improved when it comes out, and it will be attacked by groups.

Third, the restoration of ancient instruments of torture has little to do with respect or not, but there is nothing that can be done about it. If we really take the line of redemption, it really has little to do with respecting women, but one is that there is no substantive sanction for men and women to cheat, and mediation and persuasion are the main ones. So some people's private lives will certainly not only protect one of them as they did hundreds of years ago.

Therefore, this "torture device" of manual Geng stung the hearts of some women. However, cursing this kind of torture on the spot seems to reveal your role. In contrast, it is much easier to accept a big hat of "disrespect for women".

Fourth, after all, it is not a feudal society. Things that have been abolished should not appear in the market, otherwise the next one can restore a dog's head. Let's talk about this torture device. Even in ancient times, this kind of thing should not appear in the streets. This thing appeared in the yamen. At this time, this thing actually appeared on a small video platform. A carpenter made this thing in a curious way and spread it widely on the Internet. Of course it has a bad effect.

In other words, this time the carpenter is a donkey, and next time the whole blacksmith will be a tiger with a dog's head. In this case, it is definitely not possible in the current society ruled by law.

Generally speaking, the production of ancient instruments of torture by non-archaeologists is definitely not a repair, but a grandstanding and eye-catching. What are we talking about restoring history?