Ask for some metaphysical forums or websites that don't have much religious propaganda. It is best to be purely academic, both at home and abroad.

How to transform the scientific theme into humanistic sociology, cultural theory and cultural academic proposition?

When human beings can't clearly realize that the transmission of human knowledge depends on the perfect academic truth of the knowledge carrier system, the academic thinking procedure is bound to be chaotic and disorderly. The order of human identity activities is established according to the theoretical grammatical rules of cultural meaning communication text construction formed by interpersonal communication principle. The writing ability of theoretical articles is based on thinking and discriminating ability and writing experience. An illiterate person may not be able to establish the order of discourse; It is also common for a high-scoring student in the Chinese Department or a philosophy professor to talk backwards. This shows that the interaction between scientific knowledge, social experience, cultural wisdom and theoretical scholarship needs to be investigated clearly through academic research. Knowledge is the accumulation of human scientific exploration in history and culture, society is the system of realistic human activity relations, cultural rationality is a new cultural achievement obtained by learning and applying the accumulated achievements of public culture, and cultural scholarship is the re-study of cultural theory. This is a deduction process of an academic research topic, and its occurrence order and composition relationship are the composition relationship at the macro-theoretical level. Without a long process of cultural study, social experience and theoretical research, the establishment of academic discrimination ability in the process of proposition derivation in macro-relations cannot be established. So I often remind young people not to think that you have discovered a big secret just because your thinking has reached a little breakthrough in your own rational limitations. People's cultural wisdom is mature, and it is impossible to learn it only from books. There are few so-called philosophers who can be recognized in the history of human culture. Don't think that you can understand the so-called philosophy by reading a handout called philosophy. A "philosophy professor" may not pass the threshold of the so-called "philosophy hall" all his life.

The so-called philosophy is a macro-overall theoretical style. Looking up at the universe, we can't study philosophy, but we must break through the speculative thinking mode of religion and establish scientific proof wisdom in studying philosophical problems. However, science, human studies and sociology are not so-called philosophy. The deduction of the "prime minister" proposition constructed by macro general theory must integrate all kinds of knowledge, so the thinking method used in the speculative process of deducing the general proposition of macro general theory must be "classification and integration" The structure of human knowledge is like a chain, which link you grasp can affect the whole chain, but you can't find the beginning and end of this chain, which means you haven't seen the structure of this chain clearly. Under the scientific proposition, everything can be used as the content of scientific research; In human studies and sociology, everything can be incorporated into human studies and sociological analysis; Under the proposition of cultural rationality, everything can be brought into theoretical thinking; Culturally and academically, everything can be included in academic analysis. This seems to make us enter a maze, and it is difficult to find the order of thinking. This involves the so-called "academic problems" in the derivation of the so-called philosophical theoretical proposition "the general theory of occurrence". All human knowledge, at the terminal of knowledge transmission and communication, is based on the construction of text by language and grammar. In addition, there is no tangible evidence of learning. You know it's useless to have a lot of knowledge in your head. If you don't say or write, you won't reach a "cultural form", so people won't believe you asked questions. Whether you have knowledge or not must be proved by establishing a "cultural" form. This is cultural and academic wisdom. The way of cultural and academic exchange is not movies, and it cannot constitute a three-dimensional information exchange. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out cultural exchange corresponding to the knowledge of both sides through the language arrangement and combination of one-way sequence movement. It's not that children don't understand the world outlook, methodology and axiology, but that they won't listen to you at all-you don't understand the basic principles of cultural exchange at all, just talk nonsense and hum. Put the two words together, the application of cultural language can span hundreds of millions of years. When many words are put together, it involves the sequence and mechanism of occurrence.

For mankind, the transformation from religious proposition to scientific proposition has gone through nearly ten thousand years, and this theoretical proposition has not been completed so far. The existence of social structure and religious contradictions are still true because of religious culture, which proves this point. With regard to China's cultural wisdom, the theoretical transformation from scientific theme to anthropology and sociology has not yet reached a theoretical breakthrough of common sense. Although "people-oriented" has been called in vain, it has not been clarified to the cultural public academically that "people-oriented" is a way of thinking applied to academic argumentation. We impulsively call for "cultural revival", but this statement is not much different from "cultural retro" in essence. Cultural scholarship, on the other hand, is dominated by "smart people", alienating the academic research on the continuation of human cultural achievements into a narrow and biased research trend. Culturally and academically, there is no belief in human culture. At present, the alienation of cultural academic research into "Confucianism fever" or "Sinology fever" has basically taken shape. The inheritance of human cultural knowledge is not Confucianism, and the classified thinking mode of cultural academic research is not divided according to the boundary of "country", a living resource. Culturally, this is because the theoretical grasp of the precise use of language at the macro level is still immature. Our efforts in cultural and academic research are far from enough.

Sociology and cultural theory are not a narrow academic category. We like the so-called philosophy, at least we should know that it is a "general" theoretical style. The general theoretical style can no longer be divided into this philosophy and that philosophy. Don't divide Lian Dongfang's philosophy and western philosophy at will. A general study of China's cultural style. The so-called philosophy belongs to all mankind, and it contains all the knowledge created by all mankind. Both east and west are studying, and the research process is different. This does not mean that the theoretical style of macro general theory can be constructed in two reasonable ways. If there are two or more "general constructions", there must be a false general construction between them. Speaking of the most terminal problems, no matter what problems are involved, writing theoretical articles should follow the rules of theoretical grammatical structure. This is the academic point of so-called philosophy. If the so-called philosophy, a theoretical construction that integrates all knowledge categories, loses the rules of cultural exchange and the structural rules of theoretical articles, then this so-called "general theory" theoretical style must not be "general theory of human knowledge architecture".

For the current academic research of China culture, in the so-called philosophy, the application of academic thinking method is still a puzzle at the level of extensive knowledge. Even if some netizens think that I can explain all the relevant issues clearly, it is useless. Only when the cultural masses understand the truth can they achieve great things. Only a few cutting-edge scholars and Bruno preach Copernicus's "Heliocentrism", which has no effect on religious believers. Bruno was burned to death by religious believers. Even if the scholar at the forefront of cultural academic research can't die, even his academic achievements will be buried by shallow academic arguments. Therefore, as a cultural scholar, we must have a strong sense of cultural responsibility and establish a good style of study that is cautious and independent. Everyone has the right to "brag" that he is the champion of academic exchanges and debates. You can brag if you are not convinced. As long as you don't let others brag about your "cowhide" in academic debate, you are good. The Olympic champion is the "first person". Is it impossible to be the "first person" in cultural academic research?

Cultural academic research is easy to be dogmatic. No matter what culture the ancients learned to speak, they didn't invent it themselves. This is the negation of the macro value of historical and cultural figures by the principle of macro-occurrence. Everyone who comes back from the dead is a "molecule" in the denominator of the cultural knowledge system accumulated by human cultural and historical achievements. The theoretical style of macro-general theory is "denominator theory" instead of "molecular theory" of religion, science, anthropology and sociology, as well as the theory of the occurrence and continuation of human cultural knowledge, which is not yet the theoretical style of macro-general theory. The theoretical style of macro-general theory must be based on the accurate application ability of cultural reasoning and the ability to follow theoretical grammar rules in order to realize correct theoretical construction. All cultural theories must be expressed by the rules of theoretical grammar construction, and all theoretical styles that violate the rules of theoretical grammar construction are "fallacies". We should not treat the common language and theoretical structure grammar accumulated by human knowledge exchange and application in history and culture as too simple and thin. The common language of reality is the essence of human wisdom accumulation. We should not separate language form from knowledge content. After 30 years of unremitting research and demonstration, I have proved that the spiral structure schematic diagram constructed by macro general theory is coupled with the DNA structure diagram of human life. This may become a theoretical form, which is inseparable from the theoretical content and strictly corresponds to the evolutionary principle of human life function. For human beings, the "Earth" happened when there was a "Heliocentrism". This is based on science. Before "Heliocentrism", China culture was considered as "a perfect place". The sentence composed of this scarlet letter is the correct sentence of human beings. It is unreasonable to say that the earth known to man happened before man. These two colorful words can remind us how to use academic thinking methods. Based on this academic thinking, we use irrefutable academic persuasiveness to explain that the so-called philosophy must be the theoretical style of "the principle of the occurrence of human knowledge system demonstrates grammar theory". "The so-called philosophy is grammaticalism." -This is a correct academic conclusion.

The construction of theoretical grammar is based on the knowledge construction of the theoretical program, and the theoretical style of macro-general theory is based on the common and universal theoretical program, such as the belief that human beings can gain public trust, the good wishes of human beings, the development direction of the virtuous circle of human civilization, and the standards of cultural and academic evaluation. There is no debate between true and false, only the truth of obstruction. Meaningful is correct, and meaningless theoretical construction is fallacy. Being able to achieve "communication" is the conclusion of cultural application of "axiology" in cultural academic research and demonstration. On this basis, we can understand that what philosophy seeks to prove is "axiom". Cultural theoretical language has its specific scope of application of theoretical propositions, and theoretical language cannot be arbitrarily misappropriated between different propositions. We casually talk about "education", "rule of law" and "management" in our cultural and academic speeches, so the theoretical language of "teaching, managing and governing" we apply can not meet the theme of "* * * and (country)".

What I am talking about is the academic problem of how to use pure theoretical grammar language, which has nothing to do with the so-called "politics". The junk language of "philosophy" such as "politics" can't be the theoretical theme language in my literary theory. Hegemonic culture has a long history of obliterating academics. Under the far-reaching influence of hegemonic culture, it is not surprising to shut up the right to speak in cultural academic forums. Who can say that "burning books to bury Confucianism" is a strange phenomenon in history and culture? A cultural crowd who is afraid of people's words has no way out of cultural vitality. If we don't love our mother tongue and use it indiscriminately, then we are not a cultural scholar who has not studied well. Ignorance is not a fault, but there is something wrong with the academic research mentality, which is not only a fault, but also a "sin"-all man-made disasters in human society occur under the condition of emotional deviation and ignorance. Cultural and academic prohibitions and nonsense are tantamount to brewing crimes against human social civilization. When we have established the academic theme and thinking method of how to write theoretical articles and applied them to a certain stage, we will gradually understand what kind of thinking process is needed for the transformation of theoretical propositions. If we can't derive the theme of social cooperation, we will certainly follow the trend and shout "democracy", "leadership", "education" and "rule of law"-it is never meaningful to talk about civilization in uncivilized language.

Solemnly declare: refuse to follow academic issues, advocate post encouragement and multi-post. Those who float in the bath and question their followers will be reprimanded.

This article comes from: Philosophy Edition of the Economic Forum of the National People's Congress. For details, please refer to :http://bbs.pinggu.org/viewthread.php? . tid = 1 10235 1 & amp； page= 1。 fromuid=2638907

The so-called philosophy is the formula and procedure of language construction (the second lecture).

Every language form has a category of gender characteristics. The relationship between categories is a system in the application of language grammar. When this system includes all categories, it constitutes a unified system of relations between categories. The correct expression of this system research is the theoretical achievement of the so-called philosophy.

-Taiji diagram can also be converted into words-Taiji diagram (note the flexible use of thinking methods here). When knowledge is transformed into words, human beings gain the ability to communicate and have the symbols to communicate with public knowledge.

-There are various symbol systems, but all of them can be regarded as "language" at the application level of interpersonal communication. Mathematical symbol is a symbol structure that lacks the expression of calculation content. It is necessary to explain the basis, significance and application value of the operation applied by mathematical symbol in words, otherwise the mathematical formula will have no basis, significance and value.

-The cultural value of constructing a "formula" and a "program" with words and characters lies in the sequential relationship between categories. A clear order of occurrence between categories and a clear category system can enable people to acquire the knowledge integration ability of classifying and sorting out knowledge; This ability is the planning ability in application-no more mistakes in language application.

The communication effect achieved by the correct application of language is that everything is right, and no one who is wrong can escape his censorship. This is the basic function of "philosophical" wisdom, named after the extension of Japanese katakana.

-human thinking about the content of sensory feelings can be expressed as "science". "Science" is all-encompassing-everything touched by human senses can be included in the review of thinking and communication. We have been trying to clarify all the problems since human beings have a cultural history. This kind of thinking and communication activity to clarify all problems is realized on the premise of creating language. Only by bringing people's feelings, thinking, communication activities and communication results-the process of optimizing the use of language into the review, and always clearly grasping that "one's own thinking and communication activities" are also in this system, can we achieve a unified overall view of the system and gain the ability to review and use "common language".

-In the principle of retrospective occurrence, it is a way of thinking that goes against human history. In order to prove everything, we must go against the principle of occurrence and find the earliest origin of the principle of occurrence. But it can be traced back to infinity, and matter can be divided infinitely-human beings are not omniscient and omnipotent gods, so they insist on proving all thinking methods wrong. This mistake lies in not doing one's duty in interpersonal communication and cultural exchange. Scientific exploration does not exclude the hypothesis, and cultural exchange does not exclude nonsense.

There is only one correct way for human beings to seek knowledge-say what they know, not what they don't know-religion is a cultural exchange text reached by human beings through wild guesses in cultural exchanges. Science is the knowledge of exploration and discovery, while philosophy is the knowledge of classification and integration. The classification and integration of knowledge is to accurately mark the categories of knowledge with language, thus forming a category integration program system based on the principles of language generation and application optimization and in line with the principles of human thinking and communication activities. This system is a language grammar application system. In addition, there is no evidence to unify the cultural inheritance of knowledge.

-human beings have been ignoring the closest facts. Turning a blind eye to the closest facts is the root cause of discourse construction errors. Religion is the construction of speculative culture beyond human knowledge, and the scientific thinking method is ignorance of the subject of exploration and discovery. Exploration and discovery activities are rooted in human's own thirst for knowledge. Human research knows nothing about the basic principles of interpersonal communication based on the language that creates knowledge, while the discussion of social laws knows nothing about the legal provisions as the grammatical application and construction of language. This ignorance of the principle of the occurrence of similar knowledge and its inability to integrate into the knowledge system will, of course, make it impossible to reach a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between knowledge categories. "One divides into two" is in the middle, and there is no mention of the topic of human language application. Of course, the application of words is ignorant. Ask "material believers" a question-what is language? This question makes material believers dumbfounded. The material believer is looking up at the sky and discussing the universe-of course, he has no research on language. So you're embarrassing him by asking him like this. He doesn't know that "the universe" is the "language" under the topic of human cultural exchange-he will say that "language is an empty form"-when it comes to language, material believers will be distracted!

-Language is a symbol of cultural exchange, indicating the category of * * *. What human beings get from the sequence of the category of * * * and its precise positioning in the whole knowledge system is a correct way of thinking in flexible use of language, which is embodied in a "formula" for accurate use of language and a "procedure" for thinking and argumentation. This process is embodied in following grammatical rules in cultural communication. Grammatical rules are the crystallization of cultural achievements accumulated by human cultural exchanges. People who don't know the rules of theoretical grammar cannot write theoretical articles.

I talk about these issues, for some netizens who casually put forward subject propositions, it may be like reading a gobbledygook. If the proposition put forward is wrong, you will never come to the correct conclusion. This is basic academic knowledge. No matter what the problem is and what the brain thinks, you should put what you see in the forum into practice to build the first public fact. Without this first fact, there would be no cultural theory and its scholarship.

Formulas and procedures of language construction are grammatical rules of theoretical language structure. This law is universal to all mankind-how to put forward propositions, how to collect arguments and how to make correct conclusions-this is a basic academic skill. In our academic circles, this basic skill is too lacking. I will post the main posts on related issues one after another. If you can't tell what philosophy is, don't explain it blindly. This is the most basic academic character. We don't have to say a learning philosophy, do we? Cultural scholarship is cultural scholarship-how to learn cultural knowledge and how to exchange perceptual and rational knowledge-there is no need to talk nonsense with the confusing word "philosophy". Say what you know, and don't talk nonsense about unclear questions. If we never think about theoretical problems in the so-called "philosophy" research, then an excellent academic article will be read as a "heavenly book" by us-you can't understand what the article is saying. Just confused. Thinking method is the key point in the so-called philosophical thinking. This question will be discussed later.