While playing mahjong together, an old man died of a sudden illness. Should other players take responsibility?

Most elderly people have aging body organs, more or less have health problems, and are not suitable for strenuous exercise, let alone mental stimulation. Playing mahjong, an entertainment activity, requires high-speed brain operation. During the operation, some elderly people with cardio-cerebral symptoms may have some accidents due to stimulation. Therefore, for the sake of health, it is suggested that the elderly should play mahjong less and refuse some recreational activities that can cause nervous excitement.

If four famous friends play mahjong together and an old man dies of a sudden illness, will other friends bear the responsibility?

Because it involves human life and a wide range, it is not explained from the legal level. We just talk about things after dinner and talk about some personal opinions. There are many rules and regulations here because responsibilities are strictly divided according to regulations.

First of all, the deceased should bear the main responsibility. Playing a card can prove that the deceased's health is worrying and he has physical illness. Then look at the specific cause of death. If there is a dispute in the process of playing mahjong, the card friend who has a dispute with the deceased should bear part of the responsibility. After all, you stand on the opposite side and intensify contradictions, which is the main person responsible for the death of the elderly. The rest of the players are also responsible. If there is a dispute in the middle of playing cards, you have the responsibility to settle it. Now that a person has died, you have to take responsibility for it, but it's just a matter of how many problems.

Secondly, if there is no contradiction between the four people in the process of playing cards, the deceased died because he was stimulated by mental stress while playing cards. According to the folk saying, other card friends should not bear the responsibility, because there is no dispute in the middle, and the death of the old man is entirely due to his own physical reasons and has nothing to do with others. A friend once told such a case.

Because there is nothing to do, four retired people in a community often get together to play mahjong. That afternoon, they got together as usual, but one was missing. One of the old people called the last one present. In the process of playing cards, four people had an argument because of a wrong card, and the last one fell on the table before he recovered his breath. 120 medical staff showed that the elderly had lost their vital signs. This tragic result is not what everyone wants to see, but his son thinks that his father is angry and investigates the responsibility, and the other three elders are unwilling to bear it. He said that in recent years, four people often play cards together, and there are often quarrels at the table, and they are indifferent. Subjectively, everyone just wants to have fun, and no one wants to die. Now people are dead, which is the health cause of the deceased and has nothing to do with others.

But the son of the deceased insisted on an explanation. Later, after several prominent neighbors in the community came forward to mediate, they finally reached a settlement intention and divided the responsibilities: because they did not start work, the deceased took the main responsibility, and the old man who had a dispute with the old man took the secondary responsibility, leaving the last one. The three elderly people collectively apologized to the families of the deceased and expressed their willingness to bear the funeral expenses. In the end, the son of the deceased didn't say anything.