I am in favor of the debate in classical Chinese.

1. Should we pay attention to the dispute over classical Chinese? If we don't pay attention to classical Chinese, how can we understand and inherit excellent traditional culture? If there is a population of/kloc-0.3 billion, no one can read the Thirteen Classics and Twenty-four History, then when some of our neighbors tell you that Diaoyu Island belongs to them, the land south of McMahon Line belongs to them, the islands in the South China Sea belong to them, and even many historical figures and humanistic traditions in China belong to them, anyone and any country can misinterpret and tamper with the history of China at will, but none of us can blame and refute it. (This problem can also be divided into two parts: culture and territory, especially territory, which can also refute arguments such as "classical Chinese is useless" and "ancient culture is backward". ) Does the Xia Dynasty exist? What was the history of Shang Dynasty? Which student can seriously answer this question? For thousands of years, Xia and Shang Dynasties were almost just dynasties in simple history and fairy tales. Why? Due to the lack of rich literature records in Xia Dynasty, although the Shang Dynasty left a lot of information about Oracle Bone Inscriptions, it was lost in Anyang Yin Ruins for a long time.

If we don't study classical Chinese seriously now, and don't understand the literature and classics of the past 3,000 years, it's not hard to imagine that one day, Qin Huang Hanwu and Tang Zongsong Zu will become the same figures as myths and legends, which no one remembers or understands. We admire the beauty of words in The Book of Songs and Songs of the South, and the beauty of artistic conception in Tang and Song poetry, but how many of us can seriously understand the meaning of words in The Book of Songs and Songs of the South? How many people can appreciate the subtlety of each poem? What is the difference between Su Shi and Xin Qiji, both bold poets? Are Li Yu, Liu Yong, Li Qingzhao and Jiang Kui the same group of graceful poets? Excuse me, if we don't master classical Chinese well, how can we be related to ancient poets and poets by blood and spirit? Today's China people wear jeans and suspenders in suits and ties; Eating chicken wings hamburgers and steak pizza; Travel by car, train, plane and ship; Contact relatives and friends by phone and mobile phone, and fax to Yi Meier.

In addition, we have been studying hellow and OK since kindergarten, and we are still studying CET-4, CET-6 and IELTS TOEFL until university. During the Spring Festival and Mid-Autumn Festival, it is very troublesome for us to pay New Year greetings to our elders, but we cry and shout that we will celebrate April Fool's Day, Valentine's Day and Christmas.

Excuse me, from food, clothing, housing and transportation to manners, what else can prove that we are from China? Apart from a fragile soul gradually eroded by western civilization and modern fast food culture, what else do we China people have? Why can't you keep a little unique style for yourself? Some people say that written language and traditional culture are too backward and outdated. Is Chinese mainland, which pays more attention to the reading of classical Chinese than we do, more backward than we try our best to eradicate the few remaining classical Chinese in Chinese textbooks? Our neighbors, still wearing kimonos, living old festivals, listening to music and watching sumo, are they more backward than China? Don't blame the road if you can't run. Please see if your shoelaces are fastened first! That's all. These questions and answers are all positive. I hope they can be used.

2. Should we pay attention to the dispute over classical Chinese? If we don't pay attention to classical Chinese, how can we understand and inherit excellent traditional culture?

If there is a population of/kloc-0.3 billion, no one can read the Thirteen Classics and Twenty-four History, then when some of our neighbors tell you that Diaoyu Island belongs to them, the land south of McMahon Line belongs to them, the islands in the South China Sea belong to them, and even many historical figures and humanistic traditions in China belong to them, anyone and any country can misinterpret and tamper with the history of China at will, but none of us can blame and refute it. (This problem can also be divided into two parts: culture and territory, especially territory, which can also refute the argument that "classical Chinese is useless" and "China's ancient culture is backward")

Excuse me, does the Xia Dynasty exist? What was the history of Shang Dynasty? Which student can seriously answer this question? For thousands of years, Xia and Shang Dynasties were almost just dynasties in simple history and fairy tales. Why? Due to the lack of rich literature records in Xia Dynasty, although the Shang Dynasty left a lot of information about Oracle Bone Inscriptions, it was lost in Anyang Yin Ruins for a long time. If we don't study classical Chinese seriously now, and don't understand the literature and classics of the past 3,000 years, it's not hard to imagine that one day, Qin Huang Hanwu and Tang Zongsong Zu will become the same figures as myths and legends, which no one remembers or understands.

We admire the beauty of words in The Book of Songs and Songs of the South, and the beauty of artistic conception in Tang and Song poetry, but how many of us can seriously understand the meaning of words in The Book of Songs and Songs of the South? How many people can appreciate the subtlety of each poem? What is the difference between Su Shi and Xin Qiji, both bold poets? Are Li Yu, Liu Yong, Li Qingzhao and Jiang Kui the same group of graceful poets? Excuse me, if we don't master classical Chinese well, how can we be related to ancient poets and poets by blood and spirit?

Today's China people wear jeans and suspenders in suits and ties; Eating chicken wings hamburgers and steak pizza; Travel by car, train, plane and ship; Contact relatives and friends by phone and mobile phone, and fax to Yi Meier. In addition, we have been studying hellow and OK since kindergarten, and we are still studying CET-4, CET-6 and IELTS TOEFL until university. During the Spring Festival and Mid-Autumn Festival, it is very troublesome for us to pay New Year greetings to our elders, but we cry and shout that we will celebrate April Fool's Day, Valentine's Day and Christmas. Excuse me, from food, clothing, housing and transportation to manners, what else can prove that we are from China? Apart from a fragile soul gradually eroded by western civilization and modern fast food culture, what else do we China people have? Why can't you keep a little unique style for yourself?

Some people say that written language and traditional culture are too backward and outdated. Is Chinese mainland, which pays more attention to the reading of classical Chinese than we do, more backward than we try our best to eradicate the few remaining classical Chinese in Chinese textbooks? Our neighbors, still wearing kimonos, living old festivals, listening to music and watching sumo, are they more backward than China? Don't blame the road if you can't run. Please see if your shoelaces are fastened first!

That's all. These questions and answers are all positive. I hope they can be used.

I want to have a debate. The content of the debate is the advantages and disadvantages of learning classical Chinese. Don't try to cover everything. The opposing side of your debate is basically the defensive side. The key is to predict the opponent's main attack point and prepare for defense. Then find 1 and two counterexamples to refute each other's arguments.

Your argument must avoid the following pitfalls: classical Chinese is complicated, impractical, out of touch with the times, difficult to learn and so on. If you say these words on the court, you will be dragged badly by the square. We can argue about the following points: 1, classical Chinese is extensive and profound, but it's a pity that modern people don't even learn Mandarin well. 2, the inheritance of traditional culture, more importantly, charm is not fur, the essence is not form, we must abandon and critically inherit the tradition. 3. Modern people's learning attitude is not correct. Learning classical Chinese is mostly sour fake vinegar, and no one really pays attention to practical application.

Here's to victory! But don't worry too much, playing well is definitely better. The joy of victory cannot exceed the fun of the debate itself. Enjoy the game and show yourself!

4. Open-book beneficial debate (I am sure) Open-book is not necessarily beneficial and open-book beneficial debate 2008-04-20 22:26 People often say that "open-book is beneficial", but some people say that "open-book is not necessarily beneficial" and those unhealthy books are harmful. Let's have a debate on this issue!

Before the debate, the individual first expresses his basic point of view, that is, first state whether you agree with "opening books is beneficial" or think that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Then according to the basic point of view, state your reasons and refute each other. Let's see who will be the best debater in this debate!

Li Xiong: I think it is beneficial to open books. You can get a lot of knowledge just by reading books, and you can get a lot of truth by reading one! Xin Yang: I don't think it's beneficial to open books. Reading more books can increase our knowledge and broaden our horizons. But those unhealthy books may make us have some bad behaviors. Besides, some students don't pay attention to protecting their eyes when reading. Reading in the dark and lying down will hurt our eyes and bring a lot of trouble. Therefore, I think it may not be beneficial to open books.

Bao Yimin: I think it is beneficial to open books. Reading can increase knowledge, help to accumulate good words and sentences, and is good for reading and writing. Jiang Xiaolong: Opening books is beneficial, because we can learn a lot from books, broaden our horizons and increase our knowledge. Those unhealthy books can only be restrained by themselves. Yang Chunbao: It is good to read more books, but it is beneficial to read some books that we teenagers should read. If we read some books that are not suitable for our teenagers, it is useless to open them. Therefore, opening a book may not be beneficial. Yin Shuang: We should study. We should read some useful books. We should avoid reading those unhealthy books!

Allen: I think "opening books is beneficial", because reading can not only let us know a lot of knowledge, but also increase our knowledge. As long as we restrain ourselves from reading those unhealthy books.

Yao Dan: You can also learn about China's ancient literature by reading. It is classical Chinese.

5. Open-book and useful debate, I agree. What I want to argue is that the origin of the word "open book is beneficial" is what Song Taizu said. "As long as you study, it will always be beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom to open books. You may ask, why do you want to talk about this? There is a simple reason. The key lies in the word "altogether". This means that there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. The reason will be clear after reading it. ) First of all, it is beneficial to good books, which everyone knows. So the argument is: is the so-called bad book? As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Small enough to learn several ways to write, a few words, or even a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So we can introduce some points to prove that bad books also have some advantages: First, as long as they are called bad books, they will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what will happen if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them? If the structural layout, expression, conception and language of this book are unremarkable, even worse than the general "running account" composition, how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless? Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, a bad book also has certain benefits. Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since a bad book is harmful, it must have its advantages. Fourth, maybe you want to say, "suppose there is a bad book with unsightly content, completely wrong article layout and full of wrong sentences."

"Until I can't find any advantage. But have you ever thought, even if there is such a book, can anyone read it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ since I can't understand it, the premise of "opening the book" is gone. How can you talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful? Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It can only show that the reader's own mentality is not correct. That's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame the book. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife? Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it will be beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" must be established. As for "opening books is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening books is not beneficial-is problematic: it is harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can be established naturally, but it is wrong to say "useless" ~ So, on this issue, the opposing argument is only half right (and this half is still a positive argument). Since the positive forum is bound to be established, and the opposing argument is only half right, what is the reason for the argument? Obviously, the square is invincible! There is also: Source: Song Bizhi's "Water Swallow and Literati" Tang Taizong reads three volumes of "Magnolia" every day, and makes up for it in his spare time. He tasted it: "opening books is beneficial, but I don't think it is labor." "

Interpretation: "Opening a book" means opening a book, that is, reading. Metaphor is good for reading.

Story: When Zhao Kuangyin, the great ancestor of the Song Dynasty, founded the Song Dynasty, there were still some separatist forces in various places. It was not until his younger brother Zhao Guangyi became emperor that the task of unifying the whole country was completed.

After Zhao Guangyi acceded to the throne, he was renamed Zhao Guangling, known as Song Taizong in history. After Song Taizong unified the whole country, it was determined to carry forward the traditional culture and ordered to sort out all kinds of ancient books.

At the same time, it also attaches importance to the collection of various ancient cultural materials. During the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (976-983).

Ordered the compilation of three books, Taiping Guang Ji, Taiping Yu Pinglan and Wenyuan Huaying, which made important contributions to the protection and development of chinese heritage. Seven or eight of the ten ancient books cited in Taiping Yu Lan are now out of sight.

So it can be said that it is a collection of cultural knowledge before the Northern Song Dynasty. The original name of this book is Taiping Bian.

After editing, Song Dazong attached great importance to it and stipulated that he should read three volumes every day and finish them all after one year. So it was renamed "Taiping Magnolia", which means the book read by the emperor himself during the years of Taiping and Xingguo. Song Taizong's political affairs are very busy. He often fails to read this book as planned because he is dealing with other things, so he makes up reading in his spare time.

The courtiers were afraid that he would study too long and affect his health. Taizong said, "As long as I open a book to read, I will get benefits, so I don't feel tired." Tanggula Mountain is the endless source of blood for you and me. The fire in the dragon bone marrow glows, which is the source of wisdom for you and me; A frame of five thousand years, that is the spiritual source of you and me.

Books are the crystallization of human wisdom. As the ancients said, it is beneficial to open books. Hold a frame of books and read 5,000 historical events; A pot of tea can travel 800 li.

You don't have to rush in, you can watch Chu and Han go to war. You can listen to the teacher's inculcation without snowing. Many students have studied Confucian classics since childhood, willing to bend their heads and study hard in order to enrich their knowledge system, and this is the most fundamental way to "open books".

Cao Xueqin "read it for ten years and added and deleted it five times" before becoming a "masterpiece of the Red Chamber"; Ji Xiaolan won the title of "the best scholar in the world" for "reading widely and wandering around the sea of books" ... They all got the greatest benefit from "opening books". The ancients said, "Those who often open books often learn from the past."

It can be seen that opening books can also make people avoid repeating the mistakes of their predecessors. Reading "Ten Thoughts on admonishing Taizong" can warn yourself that "if you think high and risk, you will be modest and self-grazing; If you are afraid of flooding, you think of rivers and seas. "

After reading the Analects of Confucius, we know that we should "save ourselves three times and do nothing for others". Don't believe in making friends? Can't you learn? "The ancients integrated their life experiences, feelings and experiences into the book, so it is beneficial to open the book." Open-book "can cultivate self-cultivation, cultivate sentiment and improve the spiritual realm of life."

Su Shi, who sang "The river never returns, but the waves escape", pioneered the "uninhibited school".

6. It's good for me to start the debate. I was the first. As long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it. What if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them? If the structural layout, expression, conception and language of this book are unremarkable, even worse than the general "running account" composition, how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless? Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, a bad book also has certain benefits. Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since a bad book is harmful, it must have its advantages. Fourth, maybe you want to say, "suppose there is a bad book with unsightly content, completely wrong article layout and full of wrong sentences."

"Until I can't find any advantage. But have you ever thought, even if there is such a book, can anyone read it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ since I can't understand it, the premise of "opening the book" is gone. How can you talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful? Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It can only show that the reader's own mentality is not correct. That's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame the book. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife? Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it will be beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" must be established. As for "opening books is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening books is not beneficial-is problematic: it is harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. .

7. I hope this article can give you some help in the college entrance examination. China people: Why not write a paper? April 65438+May 09:48:46 2009 Source: Jiangsu Science and Technology News Author: Zhou Defan, President of Jiangsu Education Society. Page views: 122 As we all know, as far as the relationship between language and people is concerned, it is even unique to people.

Chinese literacy has improved, and people's literacy has also improved. China's spoken and written languages are unique to the Chinese nation.

The improvement of China's language and cultural literacy is an important content for the Chinese nation to improve the quality of the whole people. As far as the function of language is concerned, language is indeed a tool. It is first and foremost a tool for thinking and, of course, a tool for communication.

As far as the meaning of Chinese expression is concerned, it can reflect people's humanistic spirit, scientific spirit, aesthetic taste and value pursuit. The instrumentality and humanism that many of us argue about are actually not viewed from the same angle, so they are not discussed at the same level.

We should see that Chinese, whether it is a symbol of people's literacy, a tool for people's thinking and communication, or an expression of a humanistic, aesthetic and value pursuit, is reflected by people's mastery of language and basic skills. In other words, only by learning oral expression and written expression can we reflect the characteristics of Chinese as a symbol of human uniqueness.

Especially written expression, can fully and perfectly reflect people's literacy. Therefore, based on the above understanding, I think it is entirely possible to take only one composition in the current college entrance examination in China.

There are many problems in education in China. The solution to these problems may be simple, because we have complicated the handling of these problems ourselves.

There are serious problems in the current Chinese examination, from the guiding ideology to the examination methods. When we were young, Chinese exams were basically compositions.

From primary school to junior high school, from junior high school to junior high school, and then to the college entrance examination, as far as Chinese exams are concerned, they are basically written. Looking back, our exam is actually purely writing articles. The imperial examination is not only stereotyped writing, but also includes selecting scholars from poems. In the Tang and Song Dynasties, scrolls (legendary works of Tang and Song Dynasties) also appeared.

What's more, we can't blindly oppose stereotyped writing of our ancestors. We should see that there are still many excellent works in the stereotyped writing of our ancestors. Even under the background of the imperial examination, China has trained many world-class masters.

It is our own problem not to see this. Don't blindly cut off history, and you can't think that the ancestral law is really useless.

Therefore, I think that the current college entrance examination Chinese can only test one composition. If we can really realize this vision and write a composition to deal with the Chinese exam in the college entrance examination, we can expect that we will bring real changes to Chinese teaching and realize a leap in the essential level of Chinese teaching.

In this context, the reform of Chinese teaching will be reflected in: Chinese class will further strengthen listening, speaking, reading and writing training, Chinese class will be endowed with real Chinese literacy, overcome the disadvantages of tedious, rigid and boring analysis and dismemberment of texts in the past, make Chinese class really vivid and make Chinese class more cultural. In this way, creating lively situations in Chinese teaching will no longer be an empty talk.

Of course, people will have all kinds of doubts. The most critical issue is that some people will worry that if only one composition is tested, the basic knowledge requirements of Chinese will be weakened.

Actually, don't worry about this. Because, if only one composition is tested in the college entrance examination, students' mastery of basic Chinese knowledge can still be detected.

For example, the layout of an article, from the use of words and punctuation to the choice of words and sentences, is enough to comprehensively measure a student's language level and estimate a student's language literacy. If I say a digression, I feel very sad. It is not uncommon for many students to write poorly now.

What's more, a notice of less than 200 words can't be written, and there will be more than a dozen typos when written. This is the result that composition teaching has not been paid due attention to.

Composition is the most comprehensive training item in Chinese course, and writing beautiful articles is also the most realistic Chinese accomplishment. If a student can get rid of typos and ill sentences in the article, and even make clear the usage of all punctuation marks, it is actually an excellent and rare Chinese training.

Of course, this also requires that the composition topic itself can reflect the degree of distinction in this respect, and the formulation of the topic should be strictly required, and the composition topic should be carefully demonstrated as a test question. In the past, our work in this field may not be in place, and it is no wonder that the public has doubts about taking only one composition in the Chinese exam.

On the other hand, the current Chinese teachers may neglect the work of language and article cultivation when training students in Chinese. In composition teaching, teachers also do not pay attention to the requirements of basic work.

The spirit of "bitterness" and "worry" mentioned by the ancients no longer appears in the current Chinese class. The beautiful talk of "singing a word and breaking several stems" and "two sentences for three years, one song and two tears" has long been a myth in China. Nowadays, it takes so much time and space to dismember the vivid whole article and split it into so many fragmented so-called knowledge points, and it needs to be piloted.

In this case, even if you can get high marks, what can you leave for the students? How long can students benefit? There is only one composition for the college entrance examination. Some people may say that there is still a way to cope with the exam, while others will recite dozens of articles to cope with the college entrance examination. Some people may even say that if the Chinese college entrance examination only tests composition, some people will guess the questions and even copy them.

Actually, don't worry about this. It is also a very good thing if someone is willing to recite dozens of articles for the exam.

If you can memorize dozens of articles and enrich the language accumulation, even guessing the title of the article is much better than writing a 200-word notice when students don't even know the composition of the article after graduation from college. What's more, in this case, I believe that everyone.

8. In the debate, I am in favor (for: opening books is beneficial, against: opening books is not necessarily beneficial). In order to help students, our view remains unchanged, that is, "opening books is beneficial." Everyone is familiar with the famous saying of Du Fu, a poet in the Tang Dynasty: "Reading breaks thousands of books, and writing is like a god." Books are the crystallization of human wisdom, the summary of human historical experience and the reflection of social life. Reading can deeply understand the meaning of life, understand the vicissitudes of the world, benefit the people all over the world, and enter the hall of wisdom. Since ancient times, people who want to become talents and scholars who want to help the world must study. Only by reading a lot of books can you become a man. How can Party B say that "opening books is beneficial"?

Party b a:

We remind Party A's debaters not to confuse our views. When we say "opening books may not be beneficial", we don't mean not reading, but adopting the correct reading method. You just said "open book is beneficial". We can see that there are good books, bad books and even "poisonous books". How can you read it indiscriminately? Besides, those so-called comic books, such as Wulongyuan, The Journey to the West and Snow from Winter to Sun, seem to have a special appetite for our primary school students. You think, what should I do if I keep my eyes fixed, the content is unhealthy and my eyesight drops? Not to mention those books with bad tendencies such as love killing, fortune telling, and malicious teasing of historical figures, which have a very bad influence on us children, it is really better not to open them.

Party A and Party B:

The ancients said, "Eating without meat is better than living without bamboo." Bamboo is also an elegant person. In other words, we can eat no meat for one day and study for one day. Books are the nourishment of human spirit, which can make us strong and noble. Pay attention to eye hygiene and rest for half an hour. At the same time, as long as we pay attention to reading books in regular bookstores, we won't see books with unhealthy thoughts.