What is the scientific basis of "blessed people have hairy legs, but unfortunate people are barefoot"?

Do lucky people have leg hair? In fact, we can understand from this sentence that in the past, people usually regarded those people with leg hair on their legs as blessed people, because first of all, in the past, having leg hair on their legs meant good health and often strong health, because in the past, illness was difficult to treat, and the cost was too expensive for ordinary people to afford. Another point is that people with hairy legs mean that they are diligent. Because people used to engage in physical activities, sweating was normal. Once people sweat too much, natural leg hair will turn into legs, so girls can generally live a good life when they marry such people, so having leg hair was also very popular in the past.

Barefoot poles for the unfortunate? People who have no hair on their legs are not so lucky, because people used to think that such people generally belong to that kind of weak constitution, so such people are usually unable to engage in physical activities. If such a person appears in the family, it will often be dragged down, which will make the family fall into a more impoverished situation. And for women, if they marry such a person, their marriage life will be unhappy, so naturally there will be no blessing.

In fact, it is too arbitrary to judge whether a person is blessed from this point, and there is no scientific basis at all, because anyone who watches some health programs or articles on weekdays knows that whether a person has more or less hair is often related to his own androgen. If he has too much hair on his body, he will naturally have more leg hair, so it is totally unacceptable to judge whether a person is blessed from the amount of leg hair.

Nowadays, there are not only men but also some women with more leg hair, but this is more caused by women's own androgen than estrogen, so this sentence is actually more feudal, so it is not common in today's society.