Is Zhouyi academic or witchcraft?

We have carefully searched and researched the origin and evolution of witchcraft theory as a new academic achievement of contemporary China culture, and concluded that Zhouyi is a universal philosophy, just as Laozi said.

Zhouyi is a universal culture, as Confucius said.

Zhouyi is the source of Sun Tzu's art of war, just as Sun Tzu said.

Zhouyi is a humanistic academic work, just as Xunzi said.

Zhouyi is the first of Chinese studies, as Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty said.

Zhouyi is a witchcraft. In ancient academic circles, no sage said that, but contemporary scholars have said that nature has become the research result of contemporary culture. Subjective academic achievements in the state that no new historical materials have been found and new archaeological remains have been demonstrated.

Zhouyi is the academic achievement of witchcraft. It is easy to demonstrate independently, and it is easy to integrate with the history of China's thousands of years of culture as a whole, and it is contradictory and chaotic to demonstrate again.

China scholars who put forward the academic view that Zhouyi is a kind of witchcraft should first discuss how a kind of witchcraft becomes a philosophy. It is also necessary to demonstrate how a witchcraft evolved into a humanistic academic work. It is particularly difficult to demonstrate: "Why can witchcraft become a national study in China?" Why did the ancients in China choose a kind of witchcraft as the first of Chinese studies? What is the difference between Zhouyi, the head of Chinese studies, and Zhouyi, a sorcery?

Zhouyi is the general source of China's culture and civilization, which is a unified view reached by contemporary China academic circles. China's ancestors started the process of civilization and cultural evolution by "turning human nature into the world", which is precisely the symbol of the Book of Changes. The ancients have clearly explained the evolution of China culture with China's unique cultural expression of "turning human nature into the world".

In order to obtain new academic achievements of individuals or some people, I think that "Zhouyi is a new academic achievement of witchcraft, which is extremely harmful." In addition to the contradictions and conflicts that have caused the overall evolution of China culture, it will be confusing and difficult to define the source of China civilization and China culture as witchcraft and say that witchcraft originated from China civilization and China culture without new archaeological evidence. We respect all academic research results. However, the highest interests of the country are above everything else. Facing the greatest historical opportunity of cultural renaissance in the past 5,000 years, China's cultural renaissance must get rid of the entanglement of witchcraft and restore the primitive, primitive and simple materialistic dialectical thinking state of Chinese civilization and Chinese culture. This is witchcraft. We should be honest with each other. This is not witchcraft. We must fight it.

The philosopher Popper has a famous theory of perjury, which can be used to prove that Zhouyi theory is a kind of witchcraft, an academic, scientific and cultural false proposition, and a false proposition imposed on Chinese civilization and the source of Chinese culture by human subjectivity.

KAPL· Popper said: "Without rational presupposition, there would be no original and neutral facts and observations. It is impossible to observe a fact without considering the theoretical concept of object meaning in advance. The fact itself can't make people realize. More likely, scientists first put forward bold theories to explain some phenomena, and then tirelessly test those theories-until they are replaced by new theories. "

In order to prove that Zhouyi is an academic achievement of witchcraft, scholars give up historical textual research, follow the principle of taking time as the first priority, state but do not make historical association and evolution, deny and split Confucius' Yi Chuan humanistic philosophy and the historical records of Zhouyi, deny Fuxi's painting of eight diagrams, and deny the historical truth that Zhouyi is the first of Chinese studies lasting for two thousand years. It is only through private discussion by some scholars, seemingly rational pre-design, observation and citation with opinions in advance, selective quotation of historical documents and presupposition of subjective consciousness that "Zhouyi is a kind of witchcraft, and the source of China culture is a bold artificial theory determined in advance, and it is concluded that Zhouyi is a kind of witchcraft, which is universally applicable and widely promoted."

We once defined a part of China culture as a part of the old-age restoration. It was once thought that the traditional culture of the motherland was synonymous with feudal superstition. In the new power era of cultural construction and harmonious cultural innovation, Zhouyi is a witchcraft theory, which can also be compared to a variant of feudal superstition theory. It is necessary to get rid of the entanglement of witchcraft in the revival of Chinese culture.

The Book of Changes is a new academic achievement of witchcraft: "The Book of Changes includes the Book of Changes and the Book of Changes. The Book of Changes is a book of divination, while the Book of Changes is a book of philosophy. The philosophical thought of Yijing was established by using the special structure and divination method of Yijing. Therefore, these two parts are different in content but related in form, forming a wonderful structure of philosophy and religious witchcraft. This structure is not perfect and seamless, and there are often sharp contradictions between its content and form, philosophy and religious witchcraft. If the content is subject to form, then its philosophy will become a handmaiden of religious witchcraft. On the other hand, if form is subordinate to content, then its divinatory order structure and compilation style will become tools to express philosophical thoughts. However, through this explanation, Yi Zhuan has its own historical rationality in transforming witch culture into humanistic culture and divination witchcraft into philosophy. Without this completely innovative explanation, the set of divination symbols derived from divination witchcraft can only have the meaning of divination, but can not be a tool to express philosophical thoughts.

The people of China can't understand the academic achievement of turning a witchcraft into an advanced philosophy. It is even more incomprehensible to spread it to foreigners. We should respect the cultural status quo of China objectively, and we need to get rid of the origin theory of divination witchcraft to create a harmonious culture. Because our existing archaeological evidence can prove that Zhouyi has nothing to do with the method of divination and witchcraft. At present, we have no direct evidence to prove that Zhouyi originated from divination witchcraft, and the universal legal norm is "beyond doubt".