Is what Zhihu said credible? Are the people on Zhihu reliable?

When it comes to whether what Zhihu said is credible, as we all know, someone asked the people on Zhihu whether they were reliable. In addition, someone wants to ask whether the answer on Zhihu is reliable. Do you know what this is about? Actually, is Zhihu's answer credible? Let's take a look at the people on the Zhihu. I hope I can help you!

Is what Zhihu said credible? Is Zhihu's answer credible?

1. Is what Zhihu said credible: Are the people on Zhihu reliable? Zhihu has always advertised itself as a "real online Q&A community with a friendly and rational atmosphere, connecting elites from all walks of life. Users share each other's professional knowledge, experience and insights, and constantly provide high-quality information for the China Internet. " However, this time at the Zhihu, it was revealed that "One Pirate-Wang" appeared alone, which really shocked the people who ate melons.

Zhihu's hypocrisy has long been discovered by netizens. On June 5438+ 10, 2008, an article entitled "Zhihu's Evil and My Complaint History" was published by Longmen Array of Sanmiao from the media, criticizing Zhihu's incorrect values and ignoring personal attacks or remarks, such as hammer CTO Pool, CTO in front of the park and Sanmiao himself as "Sohu's dog", and even conniving at them to some extent. The article says that human nature has its evil side. If a person ignores and indulges it instead of guiding and limiting it, what you can expect is that it will die as soon as possible. Why can't you trust those on Zhihu?

Zhihu's values aside, Zhihu's lack is also a fact. Around June, 2006, ck Xiaoxiao, a user in Zhihu, posted a post, claiming that she was a female college student, suffering from congenital heart disease, failed in surgery, could not live without love, and did not want to continue to rely on life. "ck Xiaoxiao" published itself and accepted donations from netizens. Zhihu v "Tanya" immediately recommended this article, saying that she went to see "ck Xiaoxiao", hoping that everyone would raise money for it. After investigation by Suzhou police, ck Xiaoxiao's real identity is Anhui innocent man Tong Mou, who is the same person as Tan Ya. Is everything Zhihu said true?

According to Tong's account after he arrived at the case, he first registered two online accounts, Xiaoyan and Tan Ya, on Zhihu, and posted and replied to posts such as "What kind of experience is a girlfriend" and "What kind of experience is a childhood friend", stealing Weibo photos of other netizens as avatars, and fictional "Tan Ya", a beautiful, intellectual and positive female image, which made the number of fans of "Tan Ya" rise rapidly. Is the story in Zhihu credible?

Whether a person plays a role or Zhihu cheats on donations, it is said that Zhihu is not a "real community" as advertised, but lacks connections. In Zhihu, there are life attacks almost every day. A netizen complained to Zhihu because the company he worked for was slandered in Zhihu. Zhihu's feedback turned out to be "We think well-known enterprises should be openly discussed by the public".

Zhihu's irresponsible virtue is bound to arouse the anger of netizens and must be highly valued by relevant parties. Zhihu is an Internet knowledge discussion community. It is obviously beyond the scope of "knowledge discussion" to personally attack public figures by naming names. Since Zhihu flaunts itself as "authentic", registered users should check it according to the requirements of real-name registration system. In fact, the threshold for registration in Zhihu is very low. Men can pretend to be women, and one person can play multiple roles, which is obviously far from the truth. Zhihu, is all this true?

As an online Q&A community dedicated to sharing professional knowledge, experience and opinions, Zhihu should have kept a distance from news and current affairs. There are indications that Zhihu is becoming a force to be reckoned with on the field. Last year's two hot spots-"Wei Zexi" and "Leiyang Case" both originated from Zhihu, and Zhihu has always been an important position in the subsequent disputes.

One person is divided into roles to solve the problem that new media lacks a gatekeeper mechanism. If this problem is not solved well, Zhihu can't become bigger, let alone stronger. The so-called immortality. How far Zhihu can go depends entirely on whether Zhihu is right or not. If rumors are allowed to spread and some users are allowed, there will be no future.

The above is related to whether the people on Zhihu are reliable. It's about the sharer on Zhihu. I believe what Zhihu said, and hope it will help everyone!