"One person plays three roles" takeaway brother cheated the platform for nearly 90,000 and was sentenced. Is the platform not responsible?

Earn 89,000 yuan in three months, the income of takeaway brother is enviable, but how many orders do you have to run to earn? Actually, we think too much. We didn't earn the money ourselves, we cheated it, and the method is incredible. Finally, we were sentenced to 0/8 months and fined 20,000. However, netizens raised questions. Obviously, it is a loophole in the take-away platform, which gives the younger brother an opportunity. Why does my brother have to bear it alone? The answer is that the platform has management responsibility, but this is not an excuse for illegal possession.

First, combing the incident According to media reports, the takeaway rider Zhang has been engaged in takeaway for many years. On one occasion, he found that the rider can play the three roles of customer, merchant and rider, and then place his own order, take his own order, and then return the goods to defraud the distribution fee of platform subsidies.

Think of this to make money? Opportunity? Just do that and spend money on a new mobile phone to do it? Buyer? Use other mobile phones as merchants and riders, while my mother runs convenience stores or take-away platforms, just using this resource to operate. In just three months, Zhang used his mother's mobile phone number, user name and password to hide from his family. In fact, he didn't take the order at all. He just clicked on the spot to complete the delivery and then used it? Buyer? Cancel the order as it is, and then click to complete the order with the rider account. In three months, I earned more than 89,000 platform subsidy postage.

Second, the loopholes in the platform let the takeaway brother sneak in. The staff of the takeaway platform said that the delivery fee was originally paid by the buyer, but if the order was cancelled, the merchant agreed to give a full refund, and the platform would also provide postage subsidies for the rider according to the rules. But in fact, this is a loophole. Riders can cheat with merchants to earn postage. If the quantity is small, you can't find it at all.

However, Zhang is indeed insatiable, and the amount involved is too large. The platform can see the abnormality at a glance when counting the postage data, because he earns much more money every month than other riders. Further investigation shows that his orders are cancelled, and the time is very regular, all in the early hours of the morning, so the police launched an investigation.

3. Does the platform have the responsibility to be sentenced for illegal possession? In the end, Zhang was suspected of fabricating facts and defrauding money for the purpose of illegal possession, which constituted a crime of fraud. However, because he pleaded guilty and the platform reached an understanding and compensated the other party for losses, he was given a lighter punishment, sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of 18 months and fined 20,000 yuan.

It is obviously a loophole in the platform. Zhang just took advantage of this loophole. Why is it all Zhang's responsibility? In fact, the reason is very simple, just like a passer-by has a hole in his wallet and half of his money is exposed. The thief said, why must the money be exposed? I won't steal it without showing it! But in fact, the responsibility of the platform is only its own management problem, which has nothing to do with Zhang's illegal possession.

What do you think of this? Welcome to leave a message below to discuss! Thank you for your praise and attention.