Is astrology science or fortune-telling science?

Astrology and science are two different knowledge systems, so it cannot be said that astrology has scientific basis, nor can it be said that science has astrological basis to define. Astrologers believe that there is a universal connection between things. They tried to find the connection between celestial movement and human misfortune from thousands of years of practice and experience, and summed up a set of methods to predict human destiny by observing the actual operation of celestial bodies. Therefore, astrology and astronomy are inextricably linked. However, with the development of astrology, there are many differences between modern astrology and astronomy, such as the displacement of ecliptic 12 house and the introduction of virtual stars. Today, astrology has long been far from astronomy. As a precognition with an ancient origin, it does not belong to the category of natural science. Astrology believes that the sky at a certain time and place is related to something, and there is a corresponding relationship. The sky phenomenon at a certain time and place can be calculated, so the fate can be predicted to some extent. The theory of astrology comes from the accumulation of experience of astrologers from ancient times to the present, and a lot of knowledge of astronomy and psychology contained in it has also brought great vitality to it. Astrology has its own terms and symbols, but as mentioned above, astrology is not only realized by mathematical and physical calculations. To make a truly accurate prediction, astrologers need to learn from the wisdom of their predecessors and know themselves. Therefore, an excellent astrologer needs enough creativity besides extensive knowledge. Astrology doesn't need an advanced computer! However, because the theoretical system of astrology is not as systematic and accurate as astronomy, it has also attracted many people's criticism. They believe that astrological predictions are not objective enough and therefore lack credibility. Imagine that the so-called real science does not require scientists to join their own understanding and creation?