How to evaluate Wang Leehom's divorce in Li Lianglei?

This behavior of Li Lianglei not only sets a bad example, but also is irresponsible. First of all, it is harmful to Wang Leehom and himself to expose and spread Wang Leehom's privacy at will (the authenticity of privacy needs to be proved). I'm afraid such a person's personality is a long story. Can such a person make people feel scared? In addition, Li Lianglei emphasized in several small papers that he loves children very much. It turned out that what Li did was called having sex with his own children, which was immoral. Publishers' statements without evidence make public opinion fly all over the sky. Everyone in Japan next door knows that the inner world of such a small child is a blank sheet of paper. It seems that we have to accept the baptism of society in advance. How much will the child's future be affected? We don't know anything, and besides, Li Lianglei failed to live up to the trust of so many fans and netizens. Why did so many people support you at first, including many fans who used to be Wang? Isn't it because everyone is kind? Everyone was moved by your little composition and hoped to speak for you. Although it is irrational for many netizens to support you, it is also pure heart. Many netizens severely reprimanded those who put in a good word for Wang Leehom to support you. There was a real war, and even I saw someone swear on the Internet that his wife was not a person named Rainbow Leehom. Is this your support and encouragement? But where are you now, Ms. Li? After hammering for a long time, I didn't see any useful evidence. I remember you wrote earlier that if Wang didn't apologize publicly before 3 pm, he would sue for libel. As a result, Wang didn't do it at that time, and the apology was issued later. what did you say ? Are you kidding? Until now, I haven't seen the evidence of the real hammer. The house has been transferred to your company's name. After a quiet year, everyone was sent away. Do you think this is playing house? You say a word, and countless netizens are aggrieved for you. By the way, the world is at peace. You make so many kind people believe you, and in the end, you make so many people who support you lose sight of the truth. Aren't you using and fooling everyone? What do you want your fans to think? What do you make so many people who support you think? Use them as guns and throw them away after use? This is really a very responsible behavior!

In fact, I don't care how long and short Wang Leehom and Li Jinglei are. It's none of my business who is right or wrong. In the final analysis, it is a private matter of two Americans and a noisy consumption of public opinion resources in China. However, there is one problem I can't understand. You said that Li Lianglei had no strong evidence, and his articles were full of subjective things. How did you get the whole network to recognize Wang Leehom as love rat, Wang Leehom was found cheating, and everyone collapsed? After listening to Wang's music, you have to say that you only admire his works and don't ask right and wrong. Look at China Women's Daily's evaluation of Wang Leehom: the star is immoral, the audience does not agree, and the market does not agree; Global Times commented on Wang Leehom: An immoral artist must be very cool. What does this make people think? Shen Lei's hammer evidence over there hasn't come out yet, and the Wang Leehom incident here has been determined. Don't the media, especially the Global Times and China Women's Daily, which are more authoritative than the general media, need to base their voices on facts? In the case of insufficient evidence, an artist who has been famous for many years said it was gone. What happened to our media? Of course, if the evidence is conclusive, Wang really should be cold. There is nothing to say about this, but is there a problem with this unlicensed crime? After all, Wang's good man design is based on various donations. Creating good music and singing positive energy songs are all accumulated step by step, not fabricated out of thin air, so it is necessary to talk about the evidence of moral anomie.