Is it strange that Laozi, Confucius and Sakyamuni basically live at the same time? Who made the greatest contribution among the three?

The reason for one dimension is that the figures in the Axis era are all near the same latitude of the earth, and this area is developed in agriculture, which can support a large number of idle people and produce individual top wise men.

How do sages rank? Laozi is the director of the National Library of Zhou, and has nothing to do with Taoism. Tao Te Ching is based on the idea of matriarchal social accumulation in the pre-Qin period, and the world is the mother. The Book of Changes, as a public book, began with "dry divination" and the emperor was enshrined in the sky, which is different from the "Kun divination" in "Lian Shan Yi" and "Gui Zang Yi". Buddha Sakyamuni, from king to commoner, has the largest ideological span. Today, it spread to China, and Mahayana Buddhism is the main method. Really want to row, Wang Yangming is the first perfect person in ancient and modern times.

Socrates and Plato established the western tradition of studying the relationship between man and things (science), Sakyamuni systematically carried forward the tradition of the relationship between man and god (religion), while Confucius and Laozi in the East systematically initiated the tradition of studying the relationship between man and people (morality).

Thought and civilization, like climate, economy, nature and environment, have periodicity. Why Taoism says that Lao Tzu has changed his mind is because Buddhism and Lao Tzu's Tao Te Ching are the same, and there are too many similar reasons.

Laozi and Confucius are saints. However, it would be a big mistake to call them and Sakyamuni Buddha saints. Sakyamuni Buddha is the headmaster, and Laozi and Confucius are teachers. Sakyamuni Buddha is the only body Buddha in the mother-in-law world. Now, no matter how high his practice is, he is just a master or a mage. Sakyamuni Buddha is the only one who understands the existence of all things in the universe. Maitreya was a monk before he finally became a Buddha.

Buddha is the greatest, with the highest degree of consciousness, understands the truth of the universe, the origin of all things and the truth of life, and tirelessly teaches the public; Laozi is also a saint, and his level of consciousness is lower than that of Buddha. He knows Tao (the law of life in heaven and earth), but he is still a little unclear. Confucius is a saint, at most, an ordinary person. His understanding of things is superficial and he pays attention to the so-called ceremony. When he asked Lao Tzu for advice, he was criticized by Lao Tzu and he was still scratching his head. But even this worst talent is worth learning now (preferably selectively). People in our society are far behind those in ancient times.

And Muhammad and Jesus. These five people are basically people of the same era, no more than 200 years. According to the spiritual energy level, the energy value of a person exceeding 1000 is at least equal to hundreds of millions of ordinary people. With the help of these five saints, it is worthy of all people on earth. Why is this happening? At that time, the earth moved to the vicinity of the constellation, and it was destroyed without enough energy estimation. Maybe something like a star explosion can't be formed without enough energy shields. Nowadays, online novels have not been developed from this angle. Looking forward to it.

I think the Taoist realm of "harmony between man and nature" is the same as the Buddhist realm of "Buddha", and both answer the question of who I am. The "husband's adult" at home is similar. Sakyamuni Laozi can be regarded as a saint, Confucius can be regarded as a saint, and all beings are mortal. Jesus in the west is nothing. He hasn't studied the Bible, so it's hard to judge.

Buddha said that all dharma circles are dharma, and Buddha also said that all dharma are not dharma. No matter what you say in Confucianism or Taoism, you can't get rid of my Buddhism; When there are people like Xue Cheng and Hong Zhi, they say that they are not practicing Buddhism, but practicing deviation, not Buddhism. ) One is the robber logic, and the other is the logic of shirking responsibility. The complete protection of Buddhism is impeccable.

Buddhism in the Buddha's time was different from now. Confucianism and Taoism are still the same. China people choose kindness and stubbornness, or cling to the residue. Anyway, after thousands of years, Kong Sheng and Lao Zi's words are still good, and you can't even make mistakes. Buddhism in the Buddha era can eat meat and worship idols, and there is no temple culture. Buddhism was introduced into China and carried forward, mainly because of the reincarnation of Buddhists, describing the afterlife and the afterlife, and practicing this life for the afterlife.

Buddhism has a primitive Buddhist period, after Gautama and Pannie of Siddhartha, it is divided into the Seats and the Mass Department. At the same time, the so-called "size multiplication" theory appeared. When Buddhism was introduced to the East, Taoism had not yet formed, and Zhang Daoling's father was busy rebelling, let alone being the "ancestor of Taoism". The academic circle has not yet reached a conclusion about Laozi's theory of Hu's change. Why do you have to argue? Also, primitive Buddhism originated in ancient India. "Ancient Indian Civilization" is one of the four ancient civilizations. In Nepal, it is confused with today's' India'.

Tao is Tao, Tao is Tao. In the heyday of Taoism, more than 100 sects wanted to be the first. Later, everyone understood that it was useless to fight for it. In the end, everyone was a family. Coupled with the advantages and ideological unity of various factions, Taoism was formed. Buddhism and Buddhism are learning the wisdom of Sakyamuni, which has nothing to do with Buddhism.

The Buddha's thought is not to succumb to fate, to be his own master and to control his own destiny. What Buddha sees is the truth of all kinds of dharma circles, telling us not to let the illusion blind our eyes. However, some people regard Buddhism as metaphysics, or study it as learning. What's more, they say that Buddhism is superstition. These are all due to ignorance of Buddhism.

Laozi, Sakyamuni and Jesus transformed people; Confucius taught people. It's all about creating a culture for human beings to use when there is no law and no robbery! Most modern people are reincarnated as gods and buddhas, waiting to be rescued. Why did the Buddha dare to be a man in the afterlife? The mortal world is a mysterious world. If you can't keep your heart, you will get lost in it. Both Sakyamuni and Buddhism have said that great men come from middle earth!

I really don't know what I can do with my life. Maybe it's a year without direction in life. I once predicted that I would sleep for another ten years after I recovered. It belongs to dormant memory. Maybe doing nothing. And have nothing to rely on. Without desire, the more I can stand it. Actually, this world is none of my business. I just pay attention to the thoughts in my field. If you want to finish it. Don't worry. Then I think this is for the best.

The quieter it is. The quieter you are. Although lonely, I can listen to the wind. Yes, it is windy outside. I guess they have nothing to do with me, but they are already worried about others' wait-and-see and conscious fear. Maybe it's light at night. Everyone has something to save himself from darkness. Light is a pair of eyes in the dark.

There is knowledge about the causal relationship between Buddhism and Taoism, but Buddhism does not exist in this human society. In the three-dimensional world, where did humans die before they were born? Where can I live or die? Not that short? If not, where did it come from? So it is antimatter theory, and in the material society, the universe is all matter, but its composition is different. Even the atmosphere of a black hole planet is a different form of matter. Without matter, there would be no world, so I don't agree with Buddhism, which is more pragmatic and closer to life, such as the unity of man and nature, the invisibility of elephants, science and the embodiment of the laws of things. Avenue allows everything to die, and everything is self-sustaining by nature. Everything is inseparable from this law, and the intensification of contradictions means death and another contradiction, that is, another new thing. Therefore, Taoism is materialistic and Buddhism is idealistic and divorced from reality.

The "ancient India" when Sakyamuni Buddha was alive was a very unequal slave society with caste division (racial discrimination). At that time, Brahmanism (now Hinduism) opposed the marriage between Brahman caste and slave caste. Anyone who violates it will make their descendants slaves (racial discrimination). When Buddha Sakyamuni became a Buddha, he said that "Buddha is the past and all beings are the future …", which is extremely unequal.

Laozi is the inheritor and inheritor. Before that, there were real wise men of the East, real great gods, Fuxi Nuwa and Huangdi Yan Di. From the period of the Yellow Emperor in ancient times, from the word-making in Cangjie, there was an ideological and cultural heritage ... and all the essence and works in ancient times were inherited and carried forward by Laozi. Being respected as "Taoist thought" by later generations is also the wisdom of our ancestors in ancient times. There are four splendid civilizations in the ancient world, and our Chinese civilization is the only one without faults ... Excuse me, are there any other civilizations in the world besides the East? Is there a second ancient civilization in the world?