If you use a telescope, what is the difference between the constellations people see and those seen by the naked eye?

Two words, it's all ruined. Four words, the blind touch the elephant. The reason is very simple, the field of vision is too small, just like looking at an elephant with a magnifying glass.

Everything has its advantages and uses. It is as precious as gold. The wrench is definitely not as good as stainless steel, because it is too soft and quite heavy. It is undeniable that the telescope is a milestone in the history of astronomy, but it does not mean that it is lower than the naked eye everywhere.

All-day constellations vary in size, and the smallest Southern Cross is 72 square degrees, which is almost 8*9. The maximum field of view of the telescope is only once at best, and even the smallest constellation can only glimpse one-seventh of it, not to mention the big constellations that span thousands of square degrees in the sky?

The advantage of a telescope lies in the observation of a small area, so it is very wonderful to often use the "peep" in the "eye of the sky". If you observe the celestial bodies or planets in deep space, there is no doubt that the telescope will have an overwhelming advantage. But looking at the constellation, you can only say that you used it in the wrong place. For example, as mentioned above, we made a wrench out of gold.