Which do you think is more reliable, the constellation or the zodiac?

In fact, neither of them can be used as a basis for judging whether a person likes it or not, which means they are unreliable. But if we want to say that two are more reliable than who, then I think it is of course a constellation.

Because the zodiac is year after year, people who can't be born in one year all have the same personality characteristics, which is ridiculous. But if people born in a certain month or season have different personalities, and people born in spring and summer have different personalities, then I think there is a certain basis.

Moreover, when we were young, it was the time when astrology rose. At that time, all the comic books and magazines we read were about constellations. At that time, I thought it was quite accurate. The students also found the date corresponding to their corresponding constellations, and they all thought it was very accurate and right. I knew my Libra at that time, and I thought I would be a judge to measure the balance of everything in the world. Actually, it's not. It's just that you have a steelyard hidden in your head, measuring equality all the time. It was more than that. Until now, I have begun to move towards the age of 30, and the constellation still reflects my personality characteristics.

This is not only true for me, but also for my mother and my girlfriend. My girlfriend and my mother are both Taurus. As a Taurus girl, my mother and my girlfriend have too many similarities. They really care about money, and they are pragmatic and willing to work. Sometimes everything they say to me is verbatim. It should be mentioned that their ages are twenty years apart. But it is surprisingly consistent. Because of this, I believe in constellations more.