What scientific basis can astrology prove?

All of us may have heard of the "constellation" theory. The general content of astrology is to classify us into 12 constellations by each birth time, and then make a prediction of our character through these constellations. At the same time, according to the change of the horoscope every day, we can predict everyone's day or year and the future of this period, as we know, in ancient China.

But as we all know, astrology and astrology belong to a kind of metaphysics. At the same time, we should know that the personality of each of us is actually related to each of us, and to his background, social living environment and growth experience. Through this series of influences, a person's unique personality can finally be formed. From this point of view, there is no way to sum up every star in the sky.

As for the second word, about the prediction of the future, we know that it belongs to a superstition, because each of us is actually uncertain about the future and there is no way to predict it. At the same time, whether it is astrology or astrology, we all know that it may have a certain success, but it must also have a large failure rate, which is completely random from a scientific point of view.

So to sum up, we can know that astrology has no scientific basis. Even if there is, it may just be a mistake, and there is no real basis to prove that this theory is indeed correct, perfect and reliable. These are my views on this issue. I wonder if you have any other views on constellation theory?